kate winslet, guy pooers, maggie smith and, most british of all, the creator of "downtown abbey" julian fellowes. >> at the risk of being grandiloquent, i would like to thank you, the american industry. >> stephen: well, at the risk of being grandiloquent, go fornicate yourself you wicket-sniffing mash banger! america invented t.v., buddy! we get the awards for it. and look who he won for! i believe we have a clip of masterpiece theater's "downtown abbey" right here. >> pardon me, do you have any grey poupon? (laughter) (cheers and applause) you know what? you know what? i take it all back. that maggie smith can act. (laughter) of course, there's one foreigners really robbing america-- barack obama. (laughter) yesterday obama unveiled his deficit reduction plan with yet another fiery speech from the rose garden. i am beginning to think he has locked himself out of the white house and is afraid to admit he can't find his keys. (laughter) folks, you don't to be a rocket scientist to understand that the u.s. needs money. which is good because we have laid off all of our rocket scientists. (laughter

speech but not i don't really know where she right vs wrong or to discuss this with me is julian sanchez a research fellow at the cato institute joined thanks so much for being here tonight so ok let's start with this claim here about the freedom of speech of the first amendment guarantees the preakness but knox and i need to be a that true indeed is that really have anything to do with what we're talking about here no one no you know this is a weirdly doubly wrong thing i mean one the first time doesn't control what private newspapers make their policies on their website so you know they don't have to allow any comments they don't have to live free speech remedy according to the law but also the supreme court has repeatedly told that part of the freedom of speech is a free monogamist speech which means for example the government cannot require a controversial political organization and doubly c.p. is the case where the supreme court ruled on this to disclose its membership that states and localities can't make it illegal to distribute anonymous pamphlets or political literature so so yes just not true th