want good government unions do not the government you know that aren't in the neighborhood of the government you are in your well being but there are many of the reasons why it is generally only you are right gentlemen we are all talking over each other here ok ok still right. that happens on this program i want to ask all of you is it and it would say that when we look at the crisis starting in two thousand a to the present you know we talk about what government should do what they should do but it's really the central banks everywhere very the ones that have called the shots and now i'll give an opinion out now we have socialism for the rich and we have capitalism for the working class and the poor what do you think about that alan. i'm opposed to the central banks bailing out banks i mean if people. objected to the eight hundred billion dollar bail out when the bush administration did it i did it on public television i was invited into the treasury too because they said well what would you do and i told him what i would do i told him the bank needs capital than the capital should be raise

government. a member of congress and internet executive discuss the benefits and challenges of the government easing towards cloud computing. >> dan lungren is chairman of the homeland security committee on cyber security. he is a republican of california and his subcommittee held a hearing on cloud computing. congerssman lungren is our guest on "the communicators.:" i9s cloud computing inevitable? guest: it is already part of the mix. and one of the serious but concerned i have is not that it is inevitable but the fact that we ensure that the security aspects of cloud computing are ahead of time and incorporated into this new computer world. host: jennifer martina's of politico is a technology reporter. she joins us this week. guest: the hearing was focused on the, like his said, the security of cloud computing, and the federal government moving its system towards the cloud. at that hearing you described administration officials touting the benefits of the cloud as glass half full people. and th

and the government a couple years ago, the government part of the government sales, they play a role- that's a market. that's just a market. >> well, i'm explaining the differences. should the government be making phones or owning phone companies? no. there's an infrastructure called government patent and without that we wouldn't have that in america, the only thing makes america better, as long as the government is not in the phone business, it's a good thing. it's not. >> it is a role though, my point is, he understood there was a combination, a balance between private and public and particularly, in silicon valley, we have an excellent balance between what the government does, which essentially builds a stadium and what the players do, play the game. that's where innovation happens. >> i want to get back to, stephen, i don't agree that government has a role, don't get me wrong, the government should be there to enforce our laws, to protect our borders, that i agree with. the reason that california was given subsidies, they were acting like a private company and they wanted apple's

whether they are government or not.ed to proceed with caution. >> oh, not. >> i have one word for you concerning government spending. solyndra. that is a perfect example. >> of course, and david, our nation's debt is at 15 trillion and that is roughly equivalent to all . good and services that our country produces. inflation at a 3.8 percent annual rate and in october, earning estimates for the s&p 500 were cut to the lowest level in april. things are getting worse and not better and washington is the reason why. >> we need to shrink government and not grow it? >> i don't know if that is the attack i would take. but things are better tha they were a couple of years ago. >> in what way? >> well. >> certainly not employment standards. >> there are risks that are raised but look at the auto industry. they are hire producing better cars. >> we took it over and it is our tax money to redo the company. >> this came with government help. i know you don't think government does anything rightt on the show. but give the governmen

the governments the downs of course was appointed and if you keep government ministers came in and they actually continued through their actions you're going to be it's already starting we will we know that one of the key figures and put it is the government minister could in whose finance minister and deputy prime minister. he lost his job recently and do you think that may be a sign of a future reshuffle in the government good that has already started over i think i think we know that cauldron will not be in the government well we don't know all well we don't know yet but it looks like he's not going to be in the government he said he doesn't want to be in the government however we don't know who is replacing him because the current replacement the acton finance minister and johnson apparently is a temporary replacement so they will be looking for a more politically connected politically important figure who will be actually around in this very key ministry. is it true you should know that rumor that they're there that couldn't didn't want to stay in the government because because he

the denigration of government, the weakening of government, the undermining of faith in government has led to financial crisis after financial crisis and poor economic management. let me just go through those financial crises very quickly for you. we have a financial crisis in the early 1980s because of walter risk who are right about in "age of greed". opec in that period, the arab oil countries raise prices three four times and raise oil prices again at the end of the decade. one of the issues that created this big inflation. but also led to a new problem. what do we do with all of those dollars over in the arab oil countries? he said i know what to do. i will lend it to south american countries and help them develop and guess what i will do in the meantime? has head of first national city bank was called then, guess what i will do in the meantime? i will pack $2 of every $200 an end and get some money on the spread. citibank did great in those years but every one of those loans turned bad by the year >> host: 80s because they were all based on a very rapid inflation of the commoditi

>> no, this in this case government failed. >> john: you agree government fails, too? >> consumer product safety commission failed. >> john: we thought it was going to solve these problems? >> maybe sometimes it does but it takes many deaths before the cpsc really stepped in and they do a voluntary recall before they force anything. it just doesn't happen. >> john: here is another of your confrontations on a contractor that took people's money and just walked away leaving houses a wreck. >> can i talk about the charges against you. >> he and his company face charges of deceptive trade practices involving a dozen homeowners saying they left his houses in unlivable conditions and owes them almost a had million dollars. >> can you tell me what is happening? >> no, sir. >> don't you have a responsibility? you did notish homes and you don't rebuild them? >> no comment. >> what do you mean no comment. what are they supposed to do? you left them without a place to live. you destroyed these people. you have no feelings about it? >> all right. i get this stuff three years mysel

governs best.hey tried that, the articles of confederation, they tried it 8 year, didn't work,. then we tried it with the constitution. >> we tried it with the constitution and 9 same generation who wrote in the constitution congress shall make no law bridging the freedom of speech-- the president of the united states john adams prosecuted a member of congress for making fun of his waist line because that was-- perceived as being against the united states-- . >> jon: he was pudgey. >> i don't think anybody would -- >> he was called his rotundity. (laughter) let me tell you a story. >> jon: we got to go. solis en, you can stick around. >> absolutely. >> jon: we're going to go now. and then we'll put this all up on the web. >> would you do that for me. >> jon: what, are you kidding me? (laughter) >> jon: you're a judge for god's sakes. i'm not going up against you. it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. it is on the book shelves now, judge andrew napolitano. thank you for being her

this is a major step toward world government. and also many that like world government are very much aware of the same thing that many others are aware of. that our financial system is very, very shaky. and there will have to be a new monetary system because money printed out of thin air eventually self-destruction and we're seeing the middle of this self-destruction. many will have to see there will be a new currency. i know a good way of starting that why don't we look and find out what the constitution says. it says only gold and silver can be legal tender. that would be a good start in the right direction. [applause] >> but there are many planning that the reforms will come and there will be a new currency. it will be of paper money loosely run by the united nations. this is when we'll have to make a decision on whether we think we should maintain our national sovereignty. you know, i think the states should run most of the government. the government was never meant to be large in washington. [applause] >> but over the decade

. >> i don't think that they want the government out of their way, they're going to the government to protect them from morn competitors so that's asking the government to help you. i can't think of an industry-- >> that's getting out of their way, helping them. >> no, they wouldn't the government to put tariffs on foreign people. lg or whom ever, dumping washing machines here and maytag has benefitted from the government surplus when you get credits for buying energy efficient. >> how does it work? >> in the long run-- >> and get laid off, jonas. >> saying that maytag would have dumped these people two years ago. are you borrowing from future prosperity. >> sure, because you're seeing a slowdown in maytag sales, and a home buying credit and allowing them to buy homes and put stuff in it like a dishwasher. >> what's the point. >> they've smoothed out the business cycle. take from future prosperity to limit the depths of recession. >> that's micromanagement. >> and denying that maytag doesn't want it. >> they want it. >> and well, gary b. all of these executive orders, there's been mor

it is not officially sanctioned by a government, a government which has an army and armed forces and has people in charge. for them to take or contemplate and plan an action such as this we have to have a strong response. >> chairman, i'm a little confused. obviously sanctions the u.s. imposed more financial sanctions today. that's part of what they did. from the statements we have, very careful to make a point there's been no shift in military preparedness or shifts in the persian gulf. why is it given what you are saying that we seem to be explicitly backing off the military side? >> well, i'd want to get out in front of the president. i'm saying i would support whatever action the president wishes to take as commander in chief. i think we should consider some, at least signs of military activity by us as movement of troops or carriers, whatever. something to indicate how seriously we are taking this and as i said another measure we could take also would be to remove from the country the iranian officials at the u.n. and in washington. that would send a strong signal. we should not

is governed by a government wide initiatives we have to make sure that thus cloud use of the government also follows the government white internet initiatives for securing the internet and in the fact that the cloud itself has capabilities for allowing the recovery of the federal systems doesn't mean that we don't need to worry about the migration of data from one plow provider to the other. >> jennifer mac martinez. >> i just want to jump into one of the gaps that you have identified and the was the migration of the data from one cloud service provider to another, and i wanted to see when the government is moving its service from one provider to another how do we know that information on the original provider is not still being stored and they don't have it anymore? >> that's an excellent question, jennifer. if you think about the framework for securing the federal systems there are controls that exist today the require federal agencies to do contingency planning. so if the systems in three locations in the country and they lose a facility they have to recover in the letter to. but the

that redistribute income from some and to others we have governments that. hinder creation they hinder innovation anybody but hey but steve it's not clear to me it's fair to say that same. thing and take it and i just point out to everyone on the panel is that you know we have electorate voted for these kinds of programs for decades ok so don't say governments i mean if we're talking about people voting for politicians that say give me more and more and more and make other people pay for it later or maybe we can supply in some commonality there i agree with that i'm a journalist i mean i really am. pretty sure. i had i want richard in new york to go yes sure. let me let me just respond to one thing that this notion that governments act as if they are the origin of what they do governments are elected and under enormous pressure from their constituencies and to explain what governments do without and nat'l izing who's pushing them to do what is a very strange logic here in the united states this statement that we can't afford social democracy forty years ago

what we are doing under this government which the last government didn't do is have a mandatory sentence for knife crime. that will be our forthcoming bill. >> my right hon. friend joins me in supporting the royal college of language therapy, which is

if we continue to expand the role of government, if we let government grow beyond limit, it will come tumbling down. but that isn't going to happen. the american people, the attitudes of the american people have changed. and they've become aware of the fact that government is too big, too intrusive, too extensive. and i have a great devil confidence in the american people. that they're going to see to it that doesn't happen. >> but if you were sitting around with experts in a room and they said, let's look at the future, where are we going to -- where are the problems and you know, because we -- listen every day on the radio and read in the newspapers that it's just a matter of time. >> i think that's wrong. fundamentally, the american -- what's been happening? is that in the period i talked about, from 1928 to now, we have been starving the successful part of our society, namely the free private enterprise system. and we've been feeding the failure. government is controls over 50% of the output of the country. but thank god government is not efficient. most of that is wasted. >> anot

what the government loses in court equal access justifies a court order to order the the government tpd at the state attorney see the cause for the government legal claim was not substantially justified. for this reason that dha has been called the anti-bully law. experience over the past 40 years is revealing shortcomings in the pag, which is what we are here to discuss today. our colleague from wyoming has been pursuing this issue not to help knowledge her efforts in this regard. her bill h.r. 1996, the government litigation savings that proposes several reforms to the e.j. first is lack of transparency. formally require chairman of the administrative conference of the united states and the attorney general to file annual reports with congress stating how much the federal government was paying now. but the conference law says funding in 1995 is only just now getting back on its feet. and the attorney general's reporting requirement was repealed altogether in 1995. the bottom line is there's been no governmentwide accounting a eaj payments. we don't know if eaj is helping those for who

we have governments that. hinder creation they endure in a very big state but steve it's not clear to me it's fair to say that state is seriously going to just take on the one thing and take i'm going to go into everyone on the panel is that you know we have electric stage voted for these kinds of programs for decades ok so don't say governments i mean if we're talking about people voting for politicians that say give me more and more and more and make other people pay for it later or maybe we can supply in some commonality there i agree with that but i didn't think i mean to really answer the major rivers you're up here go ahead i want richard in new york to go ahead yeah let me just respond to one thing that this notion that governments act as if they are the origin of what they do governments are elected and under enormous pressure from their constituencies and to explain what governments do without and that'll izing who's pushing them to do what is a very strange logic. and. russia has launched and now the

government. a member of congress who just held a hearing on the topic and an internet executive discuss the benefits and challenges of the government's easing toward cloud computing. >> host: dan lungren is chairman of the homeland security subcommittee on cybersecurity, he is a republican of california, and this week his subcommittee held a hearing on cloud computing. congressman lungren is our guest this week on "the communicators." congressman, is cloud computing for the federal government inevitable? >> guest: it not only is inevitable, it's already part of the mix and one of the serious concerns i have is not that it's inevitable, but the fact that we insure that the security aspects of cloud computing are forecast, are dealt with ahead of time and are incorporated into this new, this new computer world. i mean, cloud computing is part of the new computer world. >> host: jennifer martinez of politico is a technology reporter, she's also joining us this week on "the communicators." >> host: t

government supports us and we give the government money. and we wonder why there is chaos in that country. but i tell you what, there is another option of those three. and that is the one that the founders and feist, george washington and feist very strongly in his farewell address. and that is making friends with as many people who want to be friends and trade with as many people who want to trade. not to try to get involved in an internal affairs, not to get involved in entangling liances. i can't think of anything more entangling than getting involved in the imf and the world bank and the united nations to go into the war. [applause] [cheering] so as bad as it has been over these decades of a sliding into the and declared war it is actuly getting worse because we went into libya, now in ugonda, with no cnsultation, no consultation with congress and say this is the problem we have and try to make the argument is for the national security. none of that. it's just totally ignoring the people and the congress and going and getting permission

it is not officially sanctioned by a government, a government which has an army and armed forces and has people in charge. for them to take or contemplate and plan an action such as this we have to have a strong response. >> chairman, i'm a little confused. obviously sanctions the u.s. imposed more financial sanctions today. that's part of what they did. from the statements we have, very careful to make a point there's been no shift in military preparedness or shifts in the persian gulf. why is it given what you are saying that we seem to be explicitly backing off the military side? >> well, i'd want to get out in front of the president. i'm saying i would support whatever action the president wishes to take as commander in chief. i think we should consider some, at least signs of military activity by us as movement of troops or carriers, whatever. something to indicate how seriously we are taking this and as i said another measure we could take also would be to remove from the country the iranian officials at the u.n. and in washington. that would send a strong signal. we should not

we have governments that. hinder creation they hinder innovation going to sleep but steve it's not clear to me it's fair to say that snape is seriously. just going to do anything and take you know if you're going to everyone on the panel is that you know we have a less troops that voted for these kinds of programs for decades ok so don't say governments i mean if we're talking about people voting for politicians that say give me more and more and more and make other people pay for it later or maybe we can surprise some commonality that i agree with that original thing i mean to really answer me was reassuring rock here risk go ahead i want richard in new york to go ahead let me just respond to one thing this notion that governments act as if they are the origin of what they do governments are elected and under enormous pressure from their constituencies and to explain what governments do without and that allies in who's pushing them to do what is a very strange logic. you can watch crosstalk about twenty minut

back from the dead the syrian woman reported as the first female victim of the government's pro-democracy crackdown turns up alive and well forcing several media into backtracking. greasing brians to halt the biggest twenty four hour nationwide strike in months terms violent as the cuts and big deep while the cash is slowly running out. and in business russian markets jumped at the opening following strong gains in asia and wall street. adding over two percent this hour join me for more on that in our business bulletin twenty minutes. eleven am in moscow why not trends are going to have you with us here on r.t. our top story police in the u.s. have been filmed beating back protesters out of mass demonstration in new york in the biggest event yet in a three week long rally dubbed occupy wall street there's also reports pepper spray was used on the crowd at least confirmed they've made dozens of arrests at the rally thousands have been taking part insisting protests to the man social and economic pain activists say they're fed up with breaking their backs at work by wealthy bankers can seem

the government's taken a number of steps to strengthen the system, arguably more than any government than that in 1979, under which the departmental select committees were established enabling the house to take select committee chairs and the system continues to increase. i believe that an amendment in the name of members of the a select committee will almost invariably be recognized as such by the house without the need for additional steps. >> [inaudible] >> of course. >> i'm surprised to be in disagreement with my friend on a house matter. we rarely disagree, but the kind of amendment we're talking about is one that had to be approved unanimously by the committee, and if his real fear not that of the whip's office that on just one or two more occasions, an amendment not moved by 5 minister might be selected by the chair, might achieve debate in the house, and he is not echoing the traditional front bench view that allows back benches get near selecting amendments is too dangerous tore submitted. >> it's rare when i disagree with my right honorable friends, but i do on this matter.

government? aren't state gofertz the u.s. government -- the u.s. government requires a warrant for some kinds of information, does it not, whereas, what it does to evade that, we hear, for example, the pentagon which has an enormous snoop potential -- i don't mean to use that word in a bad sense, but let's say monitoring potential, and all college students, i believe, are said to be within the per view of the pentagon. that's obtained through a contract that the pentagon issues with, i guess, choicepoint? >> it's a different private company but they are basically trying to compile records on students so they can reach out to them and recruit them into the military. >> what do you think of the pentagon having dossiers on every young person in america, mr. chairman? >> i haven't heard that honestly. it's obviously a huge task and i don't think it's being done in the light that you are talking about. i think they are probably trying to identify those individuals that would be a high risk in terms of potential terror to this country, and i think that's

than any other government just isn't working. a year ago you know lots of people thought the government was taking the right course. the governor of the bank of england, the international monetary fund. not one person -- but one person in particular stood outside the consensus. labour's chancellor. [applause] he was right. but he was not interested in being proved right. and nor am i. i am interested in the government doing the right thing by the british people. so there is a big choice facing the country. whether it's to stick to the current plan or to change course. there is an alternative for britain and other countries to get together and work to get growth going across the world. to cut vhe in britain and to ley a bank bonus tax to put the young unemployed back to work. i say to david cameron, put the politics aside. look at the facts. look at what is staring you in the face. and understand that protecting our economy matters more than protecting a plan that has failed. [applause] so i'm going to tell it straight and that's

i have the right to know what my government if you want to know why i pay taxes. well i would characterize obama as a charismatic version of american exceptionalism. you don't see a story and it seems so. you think you understand it and then you. hear or see some other part of it and realize that everything is all. part of the big. mystery. the police were looking. like what a protester nobody seems to know. but never a pepper sprayed face by target the argument that they're being overly dramatic. are you guys have time for tonight tool time award and try to go to our favorite morning show to love the hate box and friends to gretchen stephen brian really know how to take a shall we say unique approach to truly hard hitting topics and yesterday was absolutely no exception to that is some schools across the country are banning students from wearing their hollowing costumes to school and so of course fox and friends are not ok with that but they're not just not ok with it you know their style they say that it's all out war. all right so apparently they call this we d

if these allegations can be backed up, the government or elements of the government of iran were directly involved in the alleged growths. >> we heard the fbi director say voters and boundaries are irrel skprant that's what the case showed us. >> indeed. they are saying there was a plot to use a bomb and what they are calling a rep on of mass destruction regardless of what the possible repercussions can be on nontargets and civilians and targeting a diplomat of the saudi embassy. it could not be a more direct threat than if it is proved. there two suspects who are nationals, one is a naturalized u.s. citizen and this was apparently with the understanding as part of an fbi sting so we have direct threats. >> let me bring in pete williams and some of the details we know at this point is that this involved a $1.5 million bounty, if you will, for the assassinati assassination. it was part of the explanation as to why this case and these dimes were brought in the state of new york. >> a couple of things to point out. first of all, you heard a lot of rnchs to weapons of mass destruction. that's

will the prime minister--this government is not like the previous government. we will insure that this atmosphere will lose things and the incinerator will not be imposed. >> my friend makes an important point. there are difficult planning decisions that have to be made but what the government has done is age or the planning system is more democratic and does report to parliament and ministers make decisions and be accountable. i can't speak for how they make those decisions. they have to make them in their own way but we ended the idea that there was no accountability as she rightly said. >> the prime minister has warned african countries that unless they approved a rights, in many african countries where we 4 in millions of pounds of persecution and destruction of churches, lives and property. if you display a bible verse on the wall of a cafe you face prosecution. in the twenty-first century, pagans have more rights than christians. >> not always right but often right. the gentleman makes an important point. the way we judge the decision is to look at human

first i would like to say that government should not govern with a theory of [ inaudible ] we should be working together to make young people worried about the issues. we should be encouraging young people to participate in these debates as we are now. we do have to act. but we have to act in a rational and a reasonable way. i will not be supporting this motion. do i support a carbon tax that transition noose a cap-and-trade scheme, because i believe in markets. i believe in maintaining a viable economy. i believe in allowing business to adapt. i believe in the need for certainty. i will also support and encourage any discussions about the correct system to employ for the cap-and-trade scheme. what we see over the years is a lot of the times that we both agree on what should be done but we just fail to agree on how, which is so important. we must also remember not to let the best be the enemy of the good. let's commit to work together to solve this issue that we all face as global citizens. let's be realistic about the goals and set realistic targets. realistic goals that inspire inn

this is a protest about government corruption and it's not going to be tomorrow that the government and the corrupt practices that happen in the united states as well as all over the world but we saw in india very recently huge protests that basically brought the government to its knees and forced into past anti corruption legislation that stopped in some ways the capture of that government by the elites it's the same thing in the united states this is a movement that's rolling it's popped up in hundreds of places across the country present has issued a statement it's only going to grow russian is not sustainable in a true democracy and americans are out there on the streets like the rest of the world has been for over a year demanding true democracy so the protests that we get this straight the venting their anger at social injustice also corporate greed is there anything else so that you know. it's all united by this idea of real democracy by the idea of countability by anti corruption it's about a government that's accountable to its people that means that you have a governmental sys

there are more corrupt governments in the world fact it's a corrupt government on our side and the good triple trying to overthrow the taliban or even more corrupt even more vicious and brutal so i think that i disagree with with with that statement if i can if i don't go back to jacobson a little bit later in the program but ice and islam about i mean you do the tone coming out of washington right now how is that going down with the average pakistani because from what i understand anti-americanism is extremely high in pakistan because of america's war on terror. you know there are two pinions in that i mean my personal opinion is that. go and ask an american diplomat if there is been a reduction in the queues or in the visa applications of pakistanis going to the u.s. and the answer probably will be no. i mean there is that disconnect there is a lot of media hype people are reacting to the information which are which they are being fed and that information is that us is doing something which is completely detrimental to pakistani interests and now some of that is genuine as well i mean

tarp, wall street paid back at a government. government is 120 billion on fanny and freddie.te is smarter than government. and private switched over to 401 k pension plans. i rest my case. >> and maybe leave it to your heirs. and reports are out that president clinton wants to privatize. but the monica leninsky. >> i am open to it and hesitant because some of thed is its that are done about social security versus the pensions in tax tax. lower income people are less advantaged by the systems that are in place there. at the end of the day they will need more hand could you tell us. >> learning from the net flickings price hike nightmare and slashing prices to drag customers in privates. their tocks are about to get a boost because of it. >> cutting prices to attract customers. those are the companies that will make money for investors. >> dividend stocks great over seas and solid cash floor. >> you like it. >> they are struggling with high commodity. >> you like dollar general? >> i do less economy means more dollar store spending. >> you like the dollar stores. >> it just hit

all three branches of our government.hree branches are complicit, if you will, in the erosion of our liberty and the target of your concern. what do you think? >> guest: let me be clear in terms of, i'm glad you read the passage but there's lots of in the book and there are some judges who did rise to the occasion. they are several opinions i think were admirable. but here's the problem. let me give you an example. one of the things that happened, as you also know, president bush even though the patriot act had given him all sorts of powers he could choose to do surveillance and other things, he wanted more and, therefore, he start the national security agency without going to congress. terrorist surveillance program. that would offer soviet before the new york times expose this was going on. people within the agency were so troubled by the fact that all this, they had all this power and he was secret and nobody knew what they were doing. so when that program was exposed, congress again agreed, the president went to congr

the kabul government and the u.s. now face the huge task of quelling the violence before the pull-out in 2014. >>> now for an in-depth report, in the second part of our series on mongolia, we focus on the nomadic herdsman. this main industry used to be the main way of life in the country. now their numbers are falling sharply. changing political systems and natural disasters have played a role. so has modernization. >> reporter: for the nomadic herdsmen of mongolia, life is a constant search for pasture and water. they move with tethered to the needs of their animals. their treks across the grasslands change from year to year. the destination depends on the condition of grass and the type of livestock. closely in tune to the rhythms of nature, they carry on a lifestyle that has lasted for centuries. but, change came in the mid 1950s with mongolia adopted the receive yet system of collectivization. lifestyle cooperatives were set up across the country. they controlled herd migrations and paid wages. in return, the noma

they didn't get help from the central government. city officers don't think they will be able to start cleaning up private residences until next year. the biggest problem is there's no place to keep soil and other substances that have been removes in the decontamination process. the central government will draw a road map by the end of the month to set up temporary storage facilities. >> until we decide on the locations with a temporary, mid term and final facilities for contaminated soil, decontamination work will not progress. >> what's the latest with the fukushima daiichi? whl the people that live near the nuclear plant be able to get their lives back? >> the japanese government has announced the damaged reactors will be cooled to 100 degrees celsius and stabilized within this year. that's called cold shut down. temperatures inside reactors one, two, and three are already lower than 100 degrees. tokyo electric power company says the amount of radiation being emitted has dropped to one eight-millionth of the level from march. so t