have done the another example, you know, probably one of the other projects that has been similar arrau this is the bloomingdale's project that was negotiated at a very similar way. it went through the life of the project. the lowes agreement that we had was for the life of the project. what happens, even though it is negotiated that way, once you get in there with the employer, they call us back for reemployment as the jobs turnover. once you have kind of gotten that relationship, in my tenure, i have not had any problem with those employers coming back to us when the positions turnover. now we have a system that is pretty much automatic. that is true with the lowe's project, the bloomingdale's site. it comes out that way anyway that they call us back for reemployment services. we have a reputation in a system, and they use it. president chiu: supervisor campos. supervisor campos: thank you, mr. president. i want to thank the staff members for their presentation and i wanted to ask a few questions on the issue of health care. and if i could, through the chair, if i could address my que

history of the nave -- navy in the bay area or whether it is being prepared and maybe doing tabletop arraus potential future scenarios. >> it is interesting that you ask that question, because right before i left, some said, where are you going, and i said that i would be at fleet week it would be on the panel for disaster preparedness, and that looked at me like -- what? you do not realize, but it is not the local statistics, our federal government. it is our military as well that will help us in the time of disaster. we have our partners around the bay, but we also have a military that will lead to step in. we're going to qualify them in a major disaster. we're going to collaborate and talk today about these different issues and how they can work with us on all those levels of disasters. they come up to me and say, wow people do not understand that relationship, i think. we recognize it and will continue to work on it and will continue to collaborate, because we do not all have a lot of our resources. but collectively, we have a tremendous amount of resources. >> i would just add that tha

the peopleopo have not hav prepared enough tos enter this talk show mentalityme where they can just arrau'sthat's enough. it's not sufficient. nonetheless know whether you agree and not or whether you not agree with a lot of thelot of t republicans are not, i think lem they have a legitimate point oft view, a point of view that says america is slowing down because we are burdened by a government that is taking too much wealth, that interferes too much in thee economy, and in some areas iem,m agree in some areas i disagree. i think it is illegitimate much of you, and i d oon't think -- k think there are parts that are very simple-minded, but at the h best the party represents this the general point of view that we is, you know, that we have always been a country with a wi very small government, very light hand, and we should stick with that, and that is what theo constitution says. by a daunting the party is by its n nature illegitimate are based on joan ir hatred. >> three or four mess left. go ahead please.ry >> to t morning. so i'm very thrilled to talk to ersity o someone.nghere i was li