reference to natural not artificial persons and it pretty much stood exclusively for natural persons human beings until the late eighteenth hundreds in one thousand nine hundred sixty eight after the civil war the thirteenth fourteenth and fifteenth amendments were passed to strip slavery out of the canon constitution and banned it forever and of course they were about natural persons freeing the former slaves that for persons the thirteenth amendment explicitly bans the ownership of people banned slavery the fourteenth amendment says that everybody including former slaves is entitled to equal protection under the law and the fifteenth amendment says that everybody can vote regardless of their race but the language of the fourteenth amendment says a person without the word natural before it here's how it reads all persons born or naturalized in the united states and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the united states and of the state wherein they reside. no state shall make or enforce any law which will of bridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the unite

when british common law was first codified there have always been two types of persons natural persons are human beings like you and me artificial persons our governments churches and what over the years as evolved into the modern corporation both have a form of personhood so both can pay taxes own land and be parties to lawsuit no that would change but for fifteen hundred years everybody understood that there were different rules for natural persons and artificial persons the constitution for example starts out with the words we the people a clear reference to natural not artificial persons and a pretty much stood exclusively for natural persons human beings until the late eighteenth hundreds in one thousand nine hundred sixty eight after the civil war the thirteenth fourteenth and fifteenth amendments were passed to strip slavery out of the cannon constitution and ban it forever and of course they were about natural persons freeing the former slaves that for persons the thirteenth amendment explicitly bans the ownership of people banned slavery the fourteenth amendment says that ever

would exclude a person or result of the termination of a person that does not have a criminal history, it is included in this legislation. i do think that this program who deserves an opportunity to see if over the next two years and can be used as an effective tool. it is not going to solve the problem, but it can be used if we work with agencies, nonprofits, religious to based organizations, to help them implement the overall goal of helping individuals find work. i would offer a couple of suggestions. i have reviewed the legislation from other states as well as the federal had a legislation. they have focused eligibility of individuals, and i will read the language here, someone who has been convicted of a felony and is tired of more than one year after the conviction or release from prison for that felony. we have targeted people that have been released from jail or prison in the last year or who have been convicted of a felony. in san francisco, i will -- i would suggest that we consider a three-year period. parole can differ. that way, we're not talking about anyone convicted of

i'm less and less identified as a mad person, or a liberated mad person. and i'm identified more as a person who is traumatized by her life experience, just like so many other people. i don't want to think that i carry around this thing, this madness... i think that i go through extreme states of consciousness. sometimes that journey can look to people like it is descent in and out of madness... but fundamentally, i don't see myself as a person who is carrying around my madness. i see myself as a person who is in a process of change.

that person is very smart. i've always listen to what that person has to say. they say this will le to the company. to i am going to invest. i'm going to trade. what is that? is that tipping? is the undermining the fiduciary responsibility? how would one calculates that? >> under this rule, whether it is the sec or the justice department, the government would have to show that the person who communicated the information breached a duty of trust and confidence. what the supreme court has interpreted that to mean is the communicator it needs to have made it for a personal benefits. without the personal benefit, there is no motivatio if there is no improper motivation, there is no liability for either the tipper or the tippy. the well-intentioned communication would not be illegal insider trading. i would encourage kong bridge -- congress not to go beyond that. it works reasonably well. it is the motivation of the person communicating the information that is going to be the linchpin. >> let me complicate this a little bit more. the tipper and who was not a conscio

i'm less and less identified as a mad person, or a liberated mad person. and i'm identified more as a person who is traumatized by her life experience, just like so many other people. i don't want to think that i carry around this thing, this madness... i think that i go through extreme states of consciousness. sometimes that journey can look to people like it is descent in and out of madness... but fundamentally, i don't see myself as a person who is carrying around my madness. i see myself as a person who is in a process of change. when a resident of san francisco is looking for health care, you look in your neighborhood first. what is closest to you? if you come to a neighborhood health center or a clinic, you then have access it a system of care in the community health network. we are a system of care that was probably based on the family practice model, but it was really clear that there are special populations with special needs. the cole street clinic is a youth clinic in the heart of the haight ashbury and they target youth. tom woodell takes care

well it is personal and minute very important issue i think but it's also a very personal one for me now because we had a meeting on the twenty eighth of october there in islamabad and we're invited a whole bunch of people who come from go to the region this was the first time these guys met weston's now and so you know we were talking with them and amongst those eighty people who was this kid characters' eighty's and terek was only sixteen years old i met in my shoes and one of the people with me spent a lot of time three days later it was dear them has been hit by a drone strike and frankly there's only one way that really could have happened and that's that some informant was being paid by our government mostly curious manner notwithstanding a slightly british accent i apologize for that that our government would have tanked his car and then fired a missile said no it's just so certainly wrong and it has made it through personal millions. and you know we just showed a picture there those were the wrong pictures those weren't the two young boys that we are speaking about just now b

it was a war that i opposed politically but not very personally. i went to iraq thinking that i could push my principles aside and then get the world or with put it behind me move on. but. nothing ever burst your for the reality of war. broke up. with go back to. that give it up push. love to. get a good. job with. let's go with what is one of the goal of a long list of. nothing arab affairs you for going to iraq and seen the destruction of an entire nation nothing ever prepares you for. you know the unmeasured killing of civilians. nothing ever prepares you for what the dustiest a human being you know to kill an innocent person. nothing's going to really prepare you for the level of destruction that you bring upon a nation and that you bring on yourself from being a part of it. and yet i have i have a conscience you know which goes way beyond any law it goes way beyond any order that i can receive. but. i don't care how old you get if you're in this environment firing these weapons it's fun it's to be honest with you. to fifty caliber machine gun

a zany person -- now you can be zany. will romney's coverage get a boost now that he's actually talking to journal scientists. >> well, that's the -- journalistflation? >> well, that's the first phase. doing the interviews is step one. enough to he has to say something. until now, the fact that he's doing interviews and sat down with, for example, "the new york times." that made news. the interview didn't make news. he's got to start saying something and sharing. >> romney got the endorsement of "the des moines register," saying on "face the nation" that's just a conservative newspaper. he thought he could circumvent the press, all of us, through the debates, online video, and the like. how did that work out for him? >> not so well, howie. and it hasn't worked for any of these guys all the time of the the most popular thing circumstantial in republican primary circles is to bash the media. but guess what -- they've all been sort of seeking the validation of the media. i've been in two campaign ads now, you know, spouting

and i know that the person that they were talking about, i don't know who that person is. and if i haven't seen parts of that person in 43 years, i don't think i'm that simple that i would miss something that significant. i keep going back to, now, in the beginning, i started thinking in my mind, could i have missed something? but then i always go back to the beginning. no, i'm not missing anything. i know herman. i know him. >> ginger, how did you feel when you saw her give that interview? >> i never saw the interview. and just listening to that, you never really know a person, obviously. and that's really all i have to say on that. i would be surprised{ if she is surprised by this, honestly speaking. i would be surprised. >> is there anything you would like to say to gloria cain tonight? >> no. >> all right. >> i have no comment. >> okay. we're going to take a break here, ginger white and her attorney, edward buckley, please stay with us. we'll be back with more after this break. i take leadership, even though we don't take ourselves too seriously. these people want me t

it's a question of can i really see this person? are they the best person to be president?o relates to how they view them as a person. >> arthel: doug, i know you want to get specific and so do i. why don't you pick a candidate and his or her strongest personality trait and tell me if you think it's a winning combination. >> sure. i think mitt romney's strongest personality trait is that he looks and seems presidential. he's dignified. he projects the air of a leader and he gives you a sense, even if he's a bit reserved and remote, that he's the kind of guy who could be in the oval office. now, whether that's right or wrong, i'll leave to others. but that's the impression i think a lot of voters get. >> arthel: matt, what tutsi? >> i'd say someone like rick santorum, who has taken his whole family into iowa, what he's reinforcing in the minds of voters is that he's reliable and he's someone you can trust. he's the father of all these kids. he's obviously -- has a great relationship with his wife. i think that's a trait that's incredibly important to voters, too, something t

i think the culture badges are being won in europe in the enlightenment and personal autonomy, and personal freedom and there being one in the united states on the adjudicate christ judeo christian. with cal vun in his um. you're an individual be calvinist that and the we're in something together with god that we have sort of a contract between human beings and god and the american still think this way. you think this rhetoric out of the white house with democratic, and republican presidents. it's not going away. >> you want to comment on that. >> i think that we have that doctrine and it's held up as an ideal in america it become somewhat attenuated. the other thing about cal vunism. this is of the for and religion it became gradually what happened after the review formation that the netherlands becaformation that the netherlands became >> legalizing prostitution, and legal i guess doctor assisted suicide. religious authorities from the wide cross section of churches stand in opposition. why do you contend they are able to testimony the tide. they are misaligned with their faithful. >> i t

instead of saying a young person has a fight and hurting someone, instead of sending that young person ought to be incarcerated immediately, what we do is we put him or her and supporters, family members in a circle with the person who was harmed along with their family members and a facilitator, and that young person has the opportunity to sit face-to-face across from the person that was harmed and hear that person say, "you have devastated me. this is how. here are the human consequences of his or her actions, and the circle all together will come up with an action for the person to repair the harm. this is just an example -- say it is a case of a young person who has burned down a building, someone's home or business. instead of sending that person off to be incarcerated, he or she could be by the circle sentenced to serve 200 hours, being the personal assistant for a burn patient. that is the kind of thing that will really transform lives. [applause] in oakland, what we are trying to do is engage in these restorative actions, have restored a justice instead of punitive justice. wit

and the persons who have had another career, persons who are a little bit older tend to, we believe, exercise an exhibit that judgment, which is so necessary to what we do. one last thing in terms of public service. everybody sitting at the table, i have a number of united states attorneys. almost all of them have been in the u.s. attorney's office before. some of them are still in private practice. good luck to them. but a number of us have bounced back and forth. i think a number of us would say the most rewarding time we have had has been the time when we were in public service. you are given the opportunity to contribute. it really is a gift. the biggest gift i have had the opportunity to do this kind of work. and if the challenge of attracting and retaining great people is one that cuts across administration's where you serve, another is responding to concerns about the patriot acts. i wanted to give you a chance about what the fbi has learned in your view about the patriot act since it passed. >> the greatest benefit of the patriot act was a breakdown of the statutory walls bet

a person who has a big smile, a person who when she meets you, you are the center of the moment. >> yes, and popular too. and as she grew very pretty indeed. >> you know during high school she certainly always had a date for the prom. >> she tried college away in florida, but how could she leave colorado? and perhaps more to the point, there was a young man. and she was in love. so she returned and married and life began to pile up its layer cake of unintended change. she divorced. married again. bore three lovely children and divorced again. these things do happen. what can you say? besides keep what you can and move on. in paige's case it meant moving on here in the sprawling house on the hill with the swimming pool, magnificent canyon views, and bewitching sunsets. in the divorce, paige got the house and the kids and the mortgage. ah, yes, that. the humongous, worry-all-night you can't pay it mortgage. which might certainly have eaten away at anyone's easy good humor, god knows she wouldn't have been alone these days, but paige said her friends was not like that. if she worried, it w

i'm less and less identified as a mad person, or a liberated mad person. and i'm identified more as a person who is traumatized by her life experience, just like so many other people. i don't want to think that i carry around this thing, this madness... i think that i go through extreme states of consciousness. sometimes that journey can look to people like it is descent in and out of madness... but fundamentally, i don't see myself as a person who is carrying around my madness. i see myself as a person who is in a process of change. [music] paratransit is specialized transportation for seniors and people with disabilities who are unable to use the muni system. in san francisco, we're proud that we've had a paratransit program since 1978 long before it was mandated by the americans with disabilities act in 1990. san francisco is a unique city and our paratransit program reflects this. we have a network of services, including sf access van service, paratransit taxi, including wheelchair accessible ramp taxi and group van which serves groups of individuals g

and she says she's reading a lot about military personalities, specifically military personalities who have gone into politics. and it was an interesting insight because this is exactly who she is is dealing with now, the president, a military general, who you know, has gone civilian and now is running the country ostensibly. this is the person she has to deal with. so you see her trying to grapple with how to deal with this man and make compromises is so that they can build these reforms that both have been talking about. >> warner: and how does the u.s. see aung sung su chi's role right now. how does she fit into the u.s.-- of the u.s.

>> no, she's a person.d that she's my person of the year. michele obama. when she responded to rush limbaugh who called her uppity, see, uppity, she said -- her response was, i own my own happiness. and i thought, as an american where it's supposed to be life, liberty and the pursuit of -- she's not pursuing it. she's like, i own my happiness. so, as a feminist, as a black woman, as a human being, that was -- >> that is a great quote. >> i thought, we could all do that so michelle rocks hard. >> i own my own happiness. i don't think i knew that but -- >> that is good. >> you can't control what people say about you, but you can control what you think about -- how you react to what people say about you. i'm struck by how much in the age of the internet we are bombarded with constant sort of feedback about ourselves. that realities up and down the chain. doesn't matter -- i mean, i have a tv show, so there's this -- there's a different sort of issues there but even if you're on facebook getting into troll wars

. >> it was created with eisenhower and 53 because we wanted personal policy aide to manage the lubber ret paul will you. but it was created semi into the accidentally when he brought the bundy to the white house and the administration was a of a job available called assistance to the national security affairs. would you like it? kennedy knew exactly what he didn't want. he didn't want an eisenhower process that only involved the rest of the people. what he would want was a person close at him who would be sure he got brain development and that's connected him to officials of various levels of government that didn't undercut the secretary of the st. but. spearman what was the eisenhower then created? >> you wanted to have a glow were and despite what are the basic policy approach to the major issues and major parts of the world. as we put it in much more basic defense posture, policy towards committees by the department get together and draft documents that were essential d.c. stuck to fund meant. preside over this meeting. it was created by the national security act of 1947 and it is

, but i can work with that particular person." that's the heart that we want to address in this section, and it is making sure that all parties involved understand that trauma, as dr. harris pointed out, is such a ubiquitous experience, the key issue in the assessment you have to be comfortable with that and to recognize, okay, i'm either in over my head because of self-identification or i'm not really sure what to do. so, you have an environment where there's adequate supervision and adequate opportunity for discourse so that the client doesn't feel that, for some reason, they're pushing away help because that help is uncomfortable dealing with the issue. so, yes, miss cain is right. it's more than just checking a box, but it also means that you have to be schooled. and when we come back we're going to continue to talk a little bit about what we can tell parents to do in order to help their children deal with trauma. we'll be right back. for more information on national recovery month , to find out how to get involved or to locat

it has nothing to do with his personal life. i honor his personal life, respect his personal life. this is about how you behave in the public arena. >> republicans will make the point that your political past and the obama campaign of 2008, this is standard operating procedure. the way you attack now secretary of state hillary clinton, saying that she was on different sides of issues, that she would, you know, have different views on the same issue and here, the chair of the democratic national committee stating he has no moral core, does this not portend a negative personal campaign from the president against mitt romney? >> as i said, let me say again, i honor his personal life, i respect him as a father, i respect his religious convictions, but this isn't about that. this is about how you behave in public and he seems to think that every day is a new day that he can simply change all of his positions, depending on what -- who his audience is or what the political circumstance is and that is not what you want in a president of the united states. so is that an issue? yes, that's a

i have personally been involved in, cheered bond issues for parks. i have been involved in school bond issues, cultural bond issues. in many, many charities. i can tell you, from my personal standpoint that every time i have made a request to support something that is good for the city, he has never turned it down. he is one of those unique human beings who just simply cares deeply about the city. i want to pass on a personal incident that i not find a highlighted that. this is about 14 years ago, my wife and i were walking on west marin bijan we ran into warren and chris helman, and we set down on the sand dune and talked about how lucky we were to be in part of this country -- in this part of the country. warren lived at his watch and said i have to go, and i asked why, how could he leave paradise on a saturday afternoon, and he said i am giving a talk to a community group about san francisco, and i have to be there by 6:00. and i thought, who else on a saturday would volunteer to take his time to speak about his passions for the city to the group

they're looking for this incredibly stable person, this ideal person who will not present a risk to thewho will not be some person who goes out and commits a crime again. that's their sense of what they're looking for. again, as you said, in each of these cases, we looked at bankruptcies, we looked at liens, tax liens against people. did they own their own home? all kinds of things. each case we found minorities who were struck out who had bankruptcies or other issues. we found african-american applicants who wanted a pardon in order to improve their employment stability and were denied for employment instability. or seeking a pardon because they want, you know, they want a better job. they want financial stability and denied for financial instability. at the same time we found successful white applicants pardoned by president bush who had bankruptcies who filed for bankruptcy more than once. who were divorced multiple times, who had -- for me one of the striking things was language that was used to describe african-americans who had children outside of a marriage. where those children

when you go to the airlines, and you have a personal carry-on items, a carry-on plus a personal item,ou know there are passengers that try to pack -- pushed that envelope, so i am kind of thinking about how do we really know this is a personal blog? i do not know, but i am sure the community will monitor itself and regulate this, but i am just giving you my true thoughts on the issue. >> a dog is licensed? supervisor cohen: that is actually a really good idea, something i gave all lot of thought on. i am sure many of all of you know that a large part of this is in district 10, so it has been a very popular issue in the neighborhood, and so, supervisor wiener, thank you. i have your emails. my comment, from what i can here, i am willing to go with eight, eight dogs and then a personal dog, and then, of course, that is just the beginning of all public policy, that we come back and amend and tweak, and it changes need to be made, we can do that. >> ok, so i guess an additional amendment would be 39.07 a, and i will provide the clerk with this in writing. the permit team may not walk at o

i found a very complicated person, and aren't we all, really?s a close look, she was often thin-skinned and sensitive. at the same time she could be just crack that whip over the people who worked for her. but as they told me stories of the hard work they did for her there were frequently tears had her eyes. they loved her so and she was working harder than they were. it still brings tears to their eyes. >> how did you prepare? you were inspired by her. you met her once, right? >> i met her once, but that has nothing to do with this. that as a happenstance meeting which i was very intimidated. test. test. test. test. laces? really? slip-on's the way to go. more people do that, security would be like -- there's no charge for the bag. thanks. i know a quiet little place where we can get some work done. there's a three-prong plug. i have club passes. [ male announcer ] now there's a mileage card that offers special perks on united, like a free checked bag, united club passes, and priority boarding. thanks. ♪ okay. what's your secret? ♪ [ male annou

i think that there are personal feelings involved. when you talk about the changes that need to happen, people who are in the system who have been working in the system take it personally. they say if you are saying the system is broken or that changes need to be made, they feel like it is a personal attack. i think we have to decouple those things. the fact that the system and the bureaucracy is broken does not mean that the people in the system are not good people doing good work. that is one of the reasons why it gets hot sometimes because people take the things happening very personally. >> systems are made up of peace will. i hear your point about decoupling. at a certain level you cannot do that if schools are underperforming. it is not because some mechanical model is not working. people are the system. how do you decouple the people in the system from the system? >> that is tough. it is one of the things i faced in d.c. when i came into the system. i said the central office, there was a staff of 1000 people. it was not serving

the second is freedom of every person to worship god in his own way. the third is freedom from want, which translated in the world's terms means economic understandings, which will secure to every nation a healthy, peacetime life for its inhabitants. >> as americans gather around the family table this 2011 thanksgiving, the words of the 32nd u.s. president, franklin delano roosevelt, bear new relevance. unfortunately, not pleasant. the 2011 budget for food for the average american family is more stretched this year than at any time since 2008. the u.s.'s unemployment rate hovers around 9%. state by state, unemployment ranges as high as 13.4%. little wonder that the gallop polls if other polls report that two out of three americans, 66%, are preoccupied with the economy as their number-one concern. to give that wench of worry an extra turn, the world's economy, not just the u.s. economy, crashed four years ago, 2007. we are living through the fourth year of that meltdown. so what are we to be thankful for this thanksgiving? answer, american resilience.

there's always a wise person at e end. it so happens that the story, the way it unfolded happened the same way. and you go to the wise person and you say okay, like give it to me. and nothing happens and you realize you already know it, you know. >> charlie: your wife is coming in to see us today. she ju directed a film. do you want to do that? >> do i want to do that, do i want to direct? no, i have no desire. >> charlie: you're engaged in terms of tone. >> it's ultimately the director's voice. i know me too well. i'm too obsessive about getting it right. it uld consume me, take me away from my kids and i really want to spend more time with my kids and irenjoy putting the pieces together and delivering the story. i would not benefit from it nor woulthe crowd benefit from me doing it. >> i don't know. i don't know. i mean brad, is very designe >> charlie: well said, design design. >> he doesn't want to hear it. it's like he's a very gifted fellow in that regard and i have watched, we've done a little hanging out and i've w

some other person a citizen always be war. well maybe we are night. maybe it starts out mean naive and then you know as more people become conscious objectors as more people and brace the concept of pacifism then it's no longer naive like you may have been naive to say that we could reach the moon. maybe naive you know people might have looked at you like you were crazy or a dreamer. starts off being naive then you're a dreamer then maybe it's possible and then one day. you know. you progress your speech.

we develop more and more of our personal integrity. traditionally, in certain indigenous cultures, a shaman was someone who had access to the spirit world, and was able to help heal people. but that access was not necessarily just granted as like a divine gift that fell out of the sky. most shamans had to go through a period of initiation, when, to some degree, their system broke down. and in some cultures, it seemed really literally like shamans have visions of their bones being disassembled and boiled. and sometimes it seemed people who tend, as children, to be singled out to become shamans are the ones who were more sensitive, maybe more sickly, often had epileptic tendencies, but there was something in those beings that people could recognize that they could have access to those other worlds. and going through the darkness was part of finding your strength. one of the most distressing things about the disease model of mental illness in our culture, to have any periods of darkness or suffering is wrong, it means you're off the track

i'm a real person. i'm ail simple person but i'm a real person.m not late to coming to this dance of beinging a conservative. i've always been a conservative. but i in what is probably in my favor more than anything, and the last five years i have been in the lion's den of washington, d.c. when i've had a chance i didn't sit on my hands. i actively took on president obama. i was on the tip of the spear fighting president obama. he knows me. i was his chief fool when it came to obama care, fighting him on the dodd/frank bill, fighting him on illegal immigration. i was fighting when newt gingrich and a lot of these other guys were on board the same train trying to get this done. newt gingrich, for instance, spent 20 years advocating to the health care mandate as recently as may of this year. you can't possibly think these people are ever going to repeal obama care. they won't. not in a million years. i will. that's what we need. someone who will actually do what they say and that's me. >> congresswoman michele bachmann, appreciate your time. we'll k

one, personalize it. make sure that it looks like it was actually meant for this person and that you didn't just send out a blanket e-mail to everyone, hoping for one date. >> and here's another etiquette tip. don't ask someone out who you've never met in person. that's just plain tacky. think of texting as a tool for quick communication, not a replacement for communication. >> take some time. texts are important. it's, of course, important to stay connected with your friends, but you should always put down the phone and make sure that you're staying connected with the people around you. >> and remember, don't say anything in a text that you wouldn't say in person. it's easy to be mean in a text message, but it's just as hurtful. >> stay with us. there's a lot more coming up on "teen kids news." >> we'll be right back. >> frankenstein, the statue of liberty, and a bald gold guy named oscar. these are some of the images you'll find covering the hallway walls in a rather unusual school project. christian ha

i personally do not want to wear a lanyard. i would be ok to carry a card in my wallet if somebody does ask me, but you can see me and know what i am doing. it would be great, people have a huge packs of 16 to 20 dogs, or at least they have a helper to manage such a number. i feel that the $250 is too high for people starting a business. what if they do not know anybody? the also have to pay a tax and get their vehicle approved, by the end and fix it up, -- buy their vehicle and fix it up, partition it. you want to be able to do that. i also believe the enforcement problem is huge. i have called numerous times about an argentinian spitball or another who is being rough, and fights are starting, and nobody comes -- and argentinian paintball -- pat -- pittbull. i wish dog walkers were not being so vilified because i think we provide a good service, and thank you very much. president: thank you. next speaker. clerk: [reading names] >> before we move on, the director is your, rebecca cavs, in case we have any questions. -- the dire