>> i don't know if those were my exact words or not. >> val wachtel argued that h.g.use she had been unable to make a positive identification of reginald carr at a preliminary hearing a few months before. >> as you look at mr. reginald carr sitting here today, does he look to you substantially the same as he did at the preliminary hearing? >> he's more shaven right now. >> when you were asked to identify reginald carr at the preliminary hearing, were you able to see his eyes? >> he had on glasses. >> are you able to see his eyes now? >> you can, but glasses are there again. >> are his eyes substantially the same as they were at the preliminary hearing? >> yes. >> the cross-examination failed to shake her story. and after three days, the defense rested and the case went to a jury of seven men and five women. five of the jurors spoke with us, including a woodworker, an accountant, a computer systems analyst, a heavy equipment operator and a former credit card company employee. >> we were in there to get the job done and it was important that we do it, you know, right. w