tall vehicular passage between the street and the porte-cochere to retain its access road.ond, the land acquisition agreement between the city and moma that you approved in 2010 required we provide an easement to the hotel over this area. thus, it will not occur unless and until an easement is put in place. third, the museum has offered to pay the revocable access easement. i provided a draft of the agreement to be a turning. fourth, the eir contains an apartment measure to make sure the area is managed properly to provide access to the porte- cochere and loading docks, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. the eir adequately support -- describes access in a manner similar to current operations. because there will be minimal change to current operations, the eir concluded there will be no significant transportation impact with modification of the new block area. we believe our written order to record and a revocable easement removes any possibility -- an irrevocable easement removes any possibility. the next claim is that the eir did not adequately analyze construction in park

the valet services will not be able to drive through the porte- cochere that is there now. the that is not considered in the traffic impact analysis. in the long term, the access to hunt lane is also not guaranteed, so it is possible the long term situation will also be pushing valet operations, deliveries, and garbage out on to these already congested streets. the vacation of hunt line further highlights the inadequacy of the traffic analysis. the findings claim that hunt lane is not necessary and not in use, but the eir response to comments made clear if it is -- that it is, as well as the late improvement measure to have the moma voluntarily of whom -- provide some access to the w in the future. the access to the net,-- to natoma pass is not considered at all, and does not been considered the subject of action, as it is required to be. the third substantive area is the construction impact analysis. they are dismissed in the eir summarily, simply by the statement that these types of impact, because of their temporary nature, are generally considered less significant. whil

contains an apartment measure to make sure the area is managed properly to provide access to the porte- cochere and loading docks, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. the eir adequately support -- describes access in a manner similar to current operations. because there will be minimal change to current operations, the eir concluded there will be no significant transportation impact with modification of the new block area. we believe our written order to record and a revocable easement removes any possibility -- an irrevocable easement removes any possibility. the next claim is that the eir did not adequately analyze construction in parks, particularly the temporary relocation of hotel access and valet parking. that is untrue. both the draft eir and the comments and responses describe relocation during construction. because the number of trucks and valet parking vehicles associated with the hotel is so small compared to background volume, the eir concluded the impact was not significant. after the eir was published, the museum and hotel staff continued to meet. they have agreed on a construction