bondholders well i'm ok so the hedge funds are going to sue greece right now and then the european human rights court right because they know that they're the ones that are heading to the hague in these human rights court so the best defense is a good oftens because they're trying to deflect their prosecutions in these human rights courts they're trying to deflect this nuremberg trial for hedge funds and private equity groups like like romney's bain capital because they know that they'll be at the head at the end of a noose so they take the off and they say oh it's the greek people need to be the greeks oh we're going to sue greece because we raped and pillaged them for going to show them i mean this is an old strategy and the greek people i'm sorry that your country has been sold to fresh food franchises and cell phone networks but hey five thousand years of history you had a good run well i just mentioned the famine victims here is the banker who's had too many munchies i guess you could say over his lifetime surely president obama is joking about this have larry summers run the world bank thing so

human rights. its aim was to give people back the freedoms they had lost. david cameron came today to say to the european court of human rights that upholds the convention had strayed from its origins and it was time for reform. >> the court should be free to deal with the most serious violation of human rights. it should not be swamped with an endless backlog of cases. it should not act as a small claims court. it should not undermine its own reputation by going over national decisions where it does not need to. >> this is what mr. cameron is talking about. the european court's decision last week to prevent britain from deporting the radical cleric. he did not get a fair trial in jordan despite the british court's ruling otherwise. on the very same day, the court ruled that three of britain's most dangerous murderers, including one who killed four men in 1995, should not have their life sentences reviewed. the court says it is getting the balance right and warned that reform carries risk. >> some of the proposals from member states such as the u.k. seriously threaten the right of individuals all across europe

be deported to his native jordan from the huge debt as according to a ruling from the european court of human rights. he has been convicted in his absence of terror offenses in jordan. evidence obtained by torture may have been used in his trial. that is what the court has ruled. our correspondent has been following the case. i was asking why he and fought against his deportation. >> his lawyer said he could not be sent back to jordan because there was a risky would face torture. the european court said this morning they are satisfied with the guarantees the jordanians have given written after signing an agreement with jordan on the subject of guarantees. they say that he cannot be sent back to jordan because evidence against him in a previous trial when he was tried in his absence had been obtained through torture. they say there's a real risk to article 6 human rights. this is an unusual judgment. >> what are they specifically worried about the accepevidence? >> they feel that could be used against him. he would face life in prison. he is being sentenced to life in prison in his absence. he faces

human rights. its aim was to give people that the freedoms they have lost in years of conflict. but david cameron came to say that the european court of human rights will uphold the convention and had strayed from its origins and it was time to reform it appeared >> the court should be free to deal with the most serious violations of human rights. it should not be swamped with an endless backlog of cases. it should not act like a small claims court. it should not undermine its own reputation by going over national decisions where it does not need to. >> this is what mr. kamen is talking about. the european court's decision last week to prevent the radicalism be clark to say that he did not get a fair trial in jordan. but on the very same day, the court also ruled that three of britain's most dangerous murderers, including peter mor ore, should not have their life sentences reviewed. the court says that it is getting the balance right. >> some of the people from member states, such as the u.k., are seriously threatening the rights of individuals across europe to seek justice for human rights violations. >> for now, david cameron has

the european court of human rights has ruled radical cleric radical cleric abu qatada -- ruled radical cleric abu qatada would face torture. here is our home affairs correspondent. >> he has been dubbed a truly dangerous individual with the links to the leadership of the qaeda. accused of preaching holy war and instructing followers to become martyrs. >> i would describe him as an individual that poses a significant threat to the united kingdom. i base that on a number of reasons, not just material, but in the public domain about his contacts, his influence, his views, his motivations. >> abu qatada came to the uk as an asylum seeker in the early 1990's and began holding prayer meetings on the site of what is now a youth center in central london. >> this is the neighborhood where abu qatada used to preach. in the late 1990's, he gave a speech of the rise in the killing of jews, including jewish children, and said americans should be attacked no matter where they were. abu qatada is seen as having links to a global network of extremists. in his native jordan, he was convicted of his inv

in this case the european court of human rights has found that he wasn't going to be tortured but they were worried about the process of the court case in jordan. it is immensely frustrating that i do think a country like britain that has a long tradition of human rights should be able to deport people who meet -- who mean us harm. that principle is either important or not is kind of strong rhetoric about it. i'm going to strasburg next week to make the argument that as we are chairing the council of europe this is a good time to actually make reforms to the european court of human rights and make sure it ask a more proportionate way. >> thank you, mr. speaker. [shouting] on the toy of march 2010, a two and half year old boy was kidnapped from his home and taken to thailand by his mother. six months later his father finally tracked him down in a remote village on his son couldn't speak had his teeth broken and bruises all over his body. he believes that they've not got him back then, he would have been killed each year in in the u.k. over 500 children are kidnapped in similar circumsta

in this case the european court of human rights has found that he wasn't going to be tortured but they were worried about the process of the court case in jordan. it is immensely frustrating that i do think a country like britain that has a long tradition of human rights should be able to deport people who meet -- who mean us harm. that principle is either important or not is kind of strong rhetoric about it. i'm going to strasburg next week to make the argument that as we are chairing the council of europe this is a good time to actually make reforms to the european court of human rights and make sure it ask a more proportionate way. >> thank you, mr. speaker. [shouting] on the toy of march, 2010, a two and half year old boy was kidnapped from his home and taken to thailand by his mother. six months later his father finally tracked him down in a remote village on his son couldn't speak, had his teeth broken and bruises all over his body. he believes that they've not got him back then, he would have been killed each year i in the u.k. over 500 children are kidnapped in similar circumst

and russian citizens filed to the european since the court of human rights but this is a lengthy process that does not mean that it has been suspended and of course there is no link whatsoever what the w.t. oh so no correlation. because we cannot. compare. our accession to the w t o important is that might be with terrible crimes that were committed by saakashvili that can never be forgiven and a fox news agency. so ok to my course on the interfax news agency. there's. not one more question about w two this year rush is expected to finally exceed to the organization but jackson vanek amendment still remains in place in the us. when can we count on seeing this amendment lifted and if it is not true would that mean that you would not comply with part of a commitment under the w t o in its relations with the us well of course that might happen because unilateral restrictions imposed on one of the w t o member states will not pass unnoticed no one will be turning a blind eye to that time has long come to lift the amendment since nineteen times before when it was passed with one and only aim

think that when most people think human rights court they don't necessarily think bondholders why does this go . so apparently that it's a technicality in the european court of law but i think the real crime here remember when greece signed the first memorandum of understanding ninety percent of their that was written under recall and the agreement was that the rest of that would be written under u.k. law so the point was how do you secure the debt so that the greek government could be sued in a court of law so that bond holders could get their money back this is something that wouldn't have happened if they hadn't signed the memorandum and this is kind of where you'd expect this to be the fact that they're calling it a human rights violation is just a technicality but has anybody ever done this before oh absolutely i mean i think that associates they had but i think was ninety six or before the break really restructuring plan in latin america they bought some large amount of money of commercial paper guaranteed by the peruvian government from peru they went through a legal battle they ended up they went through a brussels court and they had some so