ntia put out a grant, and those grants were -- around the country, the bay area region bought one of those grants. and motorola is to apply for the grant. they received $50 million to build out this system in the bay area region. motorola has since worked with us and come forward and said they would put forward a $23 million matched to that grant. in addition to that, they will put forward a $21 million match him to do site remediation on at the sites that we need to put up the antennas. we're basically talking about $100 million that is coming into the region that is free for us that is going to build out this system that will be state of the art. there are very strict deadlines that we need to adhered to, because the ntia grant, by this coming summer, 2012, we need to be two-thirds substantially complete. things have taken a long time to get where we are right now, because working as a region, you know what it it is like in the city working. you have to do compromises. as a region, it is the more challenging, but we did stand up at jpa last may, which you unanimously approved. i am

supervisor chu: thank you -- supervisor avalos: maybe as well, adding information about ntia, what their deliberations are, the scope of funding they have as well. supervisor chu: thank you, supervisors for your input, the department for your presentation. we will continue the item for one week. thank you. item two, please. >> item 2. ordinance authorizing the san francisco public defender's office to retroactively accept and expend a grant in the amount of $231,147 from the correction standards authority for the purpose of establishing a legal educational advocacy program; and amending ordinance no. 146- 11 (annual salary ordinance, fy2011 - 2012) to reflect the addition of one class 8177 trial attorney grant-funded position (0.50 fte) at the san francisco public defender's office. >> good morning, supervisors. patricia lee. managing attorney of the san francisco juvenile unit. we are the recipient of a block two grant to establish our legal educational advocacy project. it is based on our experience of the need to provide educational advocacy for our clients and students. many of you k

ntia which is in the commerce department would make a recommendation. so that will continue to be an issue. now, it's not as broad as spectrum or online piracy, but it's still kind of a regulatory issue that the people in congress care about as well. >> host: and there's a lot of money involved there. >> guest: there's a lot of money on both sides, the gps and lightsquared. >> host: juliana gruenwald, where are we on privacy issues? >> guest: privacy. i think we'll continue to see some hearings on that. i would be surprised if we see any markup of legislation. in the house congresswoman mary bono mack has indicated she may hold more hearings on that. there is a bill out there dealing with data breaches and intrusions into companies' networks and private information being taken that could move forward, but that's also been -- there's been issues with that in the house. democrats don't like the bill that came out of mary bono mack's subcommittee, and they've been trying to work through some of those issues. in the senate, data breach legislation could get

received the funding for it through the btop program so we'll report findings back to the fcc and ntia, the outcomes of the study, and it's a yearlong program, and we're just in the beginning stages of it, but we're working with the dss in these communities to identify participants as well as service providers to partner for the service, and one of the requirements was that the services had to be bundled. this disturbed me because they could provide -- they could get the broadband service without telephone and cable and the other service that they provide, but because the way the service providers created the program, if they are on lifeline or linkup, they can be a part of the project and get the broadband, and they have to not only be eligible, but they have to buy the telephone service to get the broadband service, and that was not part of the initial plan. that's on the adoption side. i want to talk about the access side. i think there needs to be more awareness and accountability. i continue to see state and federal funding go into communities that already have existing services,

you mentioned ncia as well as -- ntia in terms of government uses of spectrum, looking at that and ensuring that that's being used most efficiently. and if it is not that there is wiggle room there that contributes that to the marketplace. so there are a lot of dynamics going on, but the key word you mentioned, commissioner, is efficiency. so the key word as it relates to incentive option, authority. yes while you already afirmed we can't tell congress what to do but we can encourage them to give us the flexibility we need to address those market changes. it literaly seems -- we just got back from c.e.s. while in terms of the physical devices, a lot of the same devices were there they just happened to be a little thinner like this commissioner, they were thinner but in terms of their uses again it requires more uses. these are the things that we have to come to grips with. when we talk about that universe, what has been troubling, and i know what is in the minds of mmtc is how do we ensure that more and more players are able to take advantage of this marketplace which is quite quite quite,

people and what you have seen here is essentially the collective wisdom of about 15 or 20 people at ntia, said especially from among the peer panel and also di you, really asking people to judge from their experience. if you look at our panel members some of them have experience on physical protection. others have worked in government's at nonprofit organizations. there are all experts on this so essentially rather than taking a mathematical approach rather than simply saying they are all equal, we essentially put a large group of very bright people in the room and we just went around and around until we reached a rough consensus on this so we are happy that is good approach. have or if you would like to try another one as we mentioned, this model is a tool. you can actually go into this if you would like and change the weightings. it doesn't change what our conclusions are. our conclusions are what you have seen here but for those of you who are so disposed to have a go at this and the other ratings have changed, you can do that. .. it was a panel of global people who are involved in nu

>> fui al dr, y me hablaron, ntÍa que se había retrasado todo el asunto.u esposo tiene dos niÑas. >> a quien quiero felicitar es a lucÍa mÉndez que hoy estÁ de cumpleaÑos, no voy a decir su edad, pero muchas felicidades a lucÍa mÉndez. >> felicitaciones a ella, felicitaciones, ana tricia, muchas gracias, cÓmo dices? >> deja..deja que te cuente. >> nos vamos a una pausa pero escuchen, no es un cuento de telenovela, pasÓ en la vida real con el candidato mexicano peÑa nieto, cÓmo reaccionarÍa usted si se entera tuene su esposo o su novio tiene un hijo fuera del matrimonio? >> y estÁ con nosotros la motivadora espiritual francis. continuos. -continuamos. >> estoy en el supermercado haciendo m compras para el segmento sobre los alimentos que rejuvenecen y quitan las arrugas, no se muevan de ahÍ! >> sÍ seÑor! y que viva mÉxi! para arrancar nuestra segunda hora! mÉxico le ganÓ tres a uno a venezuela. >> nosotros vamos a pagar la apuesta maÑana. >> deja la banderita. >> ok, viene, y la cabecita es asÍ, viendo a tu pareja. >> asÍ... ♪ >> tus hombros asÍ. >> cÓmo ba

ntia has not waited for that. it has catalyzed the creation of a world of nuclear security to share best practices for the physical protection and security of nuclear materials worldwide. it has concluded just now its third year of operation and it has over 700 members from 53 countries. and so, we are trying to improve the assist of physical protection security while we await this more important international standard. but you can't wait because the physical protection are so great. >> there is a large vacuum here and in the chios are trying to fill it. we are not the only ones, but the winds organization is in vienna. it has international board. as charlie said, over 600 members. roger housley is to head a future. robert was one of the members of our panel. that is a voluntary organization and is certainly not mandatory, but we are hoping it will grow and we are also hoping it will be up to help develop best practices. okay, i think we've got one more question here. >> yes, for leo. he mentioned countries are gi

charlie has been part of ntia and is on their board now and in our organization. >> i asked for the mic because i chair the nuclear security which is i think relevant to this last question, not to detract in any way from the comments about the need for a minimum standards. nti has not waited for that. it has catalyze the creation of a world institute of nuclear security to share best practices for the physical protection and security of nuclear materials worldwide. it is concluded just now its third year of operation and it has over 700 members from 53 countries and so we are trying to improve the practices of physical protection security while we await this more important international standard, but you can't wait it's because the physical protection necessary is so great. >> there is a large vacuum here and ngos are trying to fill it. we are not the only ones but the organization in behemoth, it has international board. as charlie said over 600 members. roger housley used to have up -- roger was one of the members of our panel. that is a voluntary organization and it is certainly not