are we creating data because we can, or are we storing data because we're creating data. >> it starts with moors law. the advent of the processer and with the cost just plummeting for us to be able to do computing, they started to string together hundreds of thousands of computers into systems. and all of these churn out data. what's happened is there's a push for data. can we keep it forever. if you're in a regulated industry, you have to keep five copies. >> i went back and looked and the first hard drive i owned was in the mid-1980s. it set me back $700, which is about $1,400 in today's money. what would $1,400 buy me today in terms of storage? >> $1,400 would buy you a lot more. you see a terabyte of storage, which is about a million mega bytes go for $600. you could probably get 200 terabytes of data. that's the equivalent of 20 million file cabinets. remember regular movies and then hd movies. then 3d movies. the entire world is turning hd. >> how fast is this going? i have seen predictions that in 2020, a pedabyte will cost about $4. if you think about the u.s. mail in 2010, th

new question -- who owns my data? what if i do want it to go away? >> there are very challenging concerns. certainly, governed by state boundaries. for example, numerous canadians do not want their data in american dissenters. under a land the vessels, that can be subject to inspection and seizure. all the regulations relate to national boundaries there as well. a cloud providers actually end up having to meet numerous diverse regulatory requirements related to where data may resign and how it may be encrypted. there are different purchase centers for different christian center's and countries -- there are different encryption centers for different regions and countries. i think amazon wishes they could make it go away the same way they imagine the sales tax would go away sunday. [laughter] >> but is it clear that i own my data? >> it is clear that you own your data, but it is not clear that somebody with the opprobrious search and seizure warrants cannot just make off with it, too. and, of course, you know, here is t

this data. we can sort it at the district station, geography, officer. we can sort it any number of ways and improve our accountability which will give us visibility in processing things that are going wrong, so one of the first things we saw is that some of the stations, a crime that was committed over here was actually getting reported over there. we have not had this ability in that. so a new opportunity, i think this problem will be greatly minimized. it will never go away. you always have issues. we have a great opportunity to improve this process. >> we will be able to go back and reclassified the crime. -- president mazzucco: we will be able to reclassify a crime. when i heard about is that if somebody it tends to break into my house, is it an attempted burglary, or is it a vandalism? or the classic scenario where someone steal something from a gap store, and they knock down a clear, is in a robbery, or is in effect? when is that changed and put in? >> oh right now, the way we do that is

i showed exclusively this data is inconsistent.acks what conclusion would i draw from that? >> you push back and say this is not an acceptable. if the poll was not 18 feet, you would say to resubmit this and get a correct. >> thank you. miss ernst. >> thank you, commissioners. i looked up the report. figure three is just four illustrations of purposes. they try to put information that shows some comparisons, but they do not have to do with this site specifically, and the grass that has the numbers is also done at worst case scenario, so it was showing even if it were lower on the pole, it would be in compliance, and i want to emphasize we will be doing a test after the installation is complete. i believe this is closer to 45 or 50 feet off the ground. i will make a note to provide it to appellants so they have thought. thank you. >> anything further? >> at this point the department would have nothing to add that would be germane to this hearing. >> if there are no further questions, the matter is submitted. >> i think i understand

engineers love the data, so what i requested was seven through 10, which is a request for data. if there was no response specifically addressed to dpw, so since i did not received a response, it is up to you, but i am asking for a government or of delay, a continuance. i think that is your choice. you know these items better than i do common -- than i do, and i think maria would like to speak. 5 i think lauren has a little more to say. i live in the neighborhood. there are bunch of people who signed the petition, so it is not only three of us. i would like to request of measurement for the dwelling and for the time frame, and i really do not understand why the three antennas, because we already have one. there is going to be one across the street, and at&t is planning another one on the building again, so i have no problem with the mobile phone. i call my mom very little times i have all lost cause, so i think it is completely fine. we are happy with the reception, and i just want to mention, the only protest, and i want to say one more thing. we have another antenna, and i am s

so that would be able to transmit data? >> correct. >> i want to ask you to address an issue, and this is a question i did have, which is if we expect a significant -- an existing system is capable of sharing data and other services, why is it we cannot substitute voice components on the 800 mhz system. goi know that have allowed to do with the specific requirements, the specifications for each of those mhz guidelines. >> the answer to that question really revolves around shivering technologies used for these different systems. the 800 mhz system will be designed around and voice communications. it is a set of tools officers need in the field to communicate quickly and efficiently by voice. the technology used in the system will be specifically tailored toward dassn't region -- toward data. the two systems today are not compatible. you cannot use 800 mhz system for high-speed data transmission. you can use it for small digital transmissions, but if you are talking about video, photos, a large digital files, it simply will n

of consumer data industry association. can you give me some idea, can you volumize how much data is in your association, by the way, stuart? we represent a lot of different models, consumer credit associations --. >> how many --. >> they have probably 250 million credit reports and we're updating four billion data elements a month. >> that's a sizable amount, is it not, evan hendricks who is editor and publisher of "privacy times". by the way he has written this great book, a great read --. >> named book of the month. >> credit scores and credit reports, how the system work and what you can do. do you want to comment about anything he has said? >> information about social security very valuable. one of the tough things about sit that we don't own data about us. when companies like stuart collects it, they own our names, we don't own them that's why they can traffic in our names. >> when you own a volume of data you can sell it for a subs shal commercial reward. >> it's an extremely lucrative business. >> we have the chairm

receive and review the data? >> yes, i think the data is required to continue, or you can revoke the permit right now. that would be fine with me. >> mainly you are seeking an opportunity to get the data, review it, and have my hearing following that opportunity now? >> yes, you have to do that, because i do not think you are willing to revoke the permit. i would rather not have to come back. >> if you want to have a hearing on the merits, we can have i hearing on the merits. it is either or. >> the first one. >> thank you. >> do we have that? we should give time. >> thank you, president garcia. >> there seems to be an issue on whether or not we are going to continue this, and i guess my question would be, my reading of that terror rough but was pointed to by the appellant says respondents, dtw, and a permit holder have to submit briefs. it does not say they have to respond to any questions asked by the government. is that a proper reading of that paragraph? >> yes, but was the date by which the permit holder and

data were fabricated? >> abundantly clear. >> pitts: no country in the world owns more gold than india: bars, coins, and a lot of jewelry. india's love for gold is as ancient as its culture. with its growing prosperity, the one event that drives most of that demand is an indian wedding. at this wedding, the bride and groom's families spent more than $200,000 just on gold. >> ♪ sometimes, it lasts in love but sometimes, it hurts instead ♪ sometimes, it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead >> cooper: whether she wins the six grammys she's up for tonight or none at all, the last year in music will be remembered as the year of adele. the 23-year-old british pop star has sold close to 18 million albums with no studio gimmicks, just an amazingly powerful voice. ♪ sometimes, it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead ♪ >> kroft: i'm steve kroft. >> stahl: i'm lesley stahl. >> safer: i'm morley safer. >> pitts: i'm byron pitts. >> cooper: i'm anderson cooper. >> pelley: i'm scott pelley. those stories

some of the questions, looking at some of the data, has posed some of the other data. i am creating a follow-up list of questions for them to answer. we have been doing a lot of data collection, looking at finding other reports out there on voting systems in general. there has not been as much done, at least on san francisco specifically, looking at data. there was one done a few years ago. i will reach out and see if they might be doing an update on that. this has been mostly data collection on the report. because we were looking at multiple different subject matters, each subject is a report in itself. you are not necessarily going to use the same data as you do for voter turnout. there are a lot of variables in place. i am trying to collect as much data as we can. supervisor avalos: thank you, mr. fried, for your work on this. we will hear from a member of the public who will talk about another type of approval voting system. i think that could be a new variable,

we had data intermittently. engine start, we need to capture the telemetry so we know the quantities of propel lanlts in the tanks, now the propellants are being settled by the acceleration of the spacecraft as the engine starts up. as soon as the engine starts, we lose telemetry, we miss this very valuable point and we continue down and now, from the time we start until the time we land on the moon, it should take about between eight and nine minutes. and this becomes a very intense period, where again steve bales has been trying to figure out what's with the navigation problem that we're halfway to the abort limit. he comes back and gives me a call that really is a bit more confident. he said we're still halfway to the abort limit but not growing. and he tends to believe that something happened upstream, might have been a lunar execution, where the engine didn't shut down perfectly. in retrospect we found out, this is after the mission, that the crew had not fully depressurized the tunnel between the two space

so i abrogated all of the data. anybody want to guess? out of 40 of the largest companies in the world, how many of the were using one or more of these -- there was about seven different applications, all delivered out of clout, -- cloud. that's over. best guess, not over. 38 out of 40. of the largest companies in the world. using one or more of these. when we debate the question of will corporations use the cloud, i would say they already have. we clearly are still in the early adoption days. i rattle off some very interesting stories right now of companies you know right now who are using lots of interesting computing and storage cloud services as well. i just wanted to get people to start to think. companies are moving this way. there is a bay area company -- i will not name names, but the cfo walk into the cio's office and said, "no more capital expenditure." the reason why i talk about this as a business model is -- and, by the way, i would be happy to send any of you guys a copy of this book. or if you want epub versions, we can do

we have to get real data. ei data is a love-hate relationship. you use it when you like it. when you don't you still use it. but you know, you get what you get. the fact of the matter is, there have been dramatic changes in the price of wind in the last two or three years. it has come down. it has not gone up. if you look at the price of natural gas and wind ei projects, they are both wrong. you ask any economist what will the price of wind be in five years, what will the price of gas be in five years, they will both be wrong. i know economists and academics have to find a place to start. ei data is not a good place to start. when you have wall street and rate cases at the state level and at the federal level that have real numbers that go into real rates. for wind that's in the $30 megawatt hour range. the one other thing about your research, i didn't quite understand why the oil and gas drilling component of the study was included in the electricity piece. i agree california should drill but i don't think they will. i don't think it's a likelihood. if they stop all imports

so i continue to push to enact the personal data privacy and security act to create a nationwide data breach notification standard. want to better combat cybercrime. that's why i propose the review and update of the electronic communications privacy act. recently some companies that dominate various aspects of cyberspace have announced they want to simplify matters so they can more easily track americans' activities across the board. obviously, to their own financial benefit. but i worry that sometimes what is simpler for corporate purposes is not better for consumers. it might be simpler for some if we had no privacy protections. if we had no antitrust protections, no consumer protections. it would be simpler for some but it certainly wouldn't be better for americans. certainly not better for americans and i worry about loss of privacy. privacy advocates like to present us with the both sides of the aisle, serious questions looking for information and answers. when dominant corporate interests may seem like a fun new app or service, they may not be presenting realistic informed choic

we had pmi data, manufacturing data coming in stronger than expected in india.in terms of equity markets, it's a mixed picture. that's it for me. i'll be back tomorrow with the news that's moving markets here in asia. >> in the meantime, mitt romney can add florida to his win list. former house speaker newt gingrich finished second with 32%. in his victory speech, romney turned his focus to president obama saying he failed to fix the u.s. economy and it's time to, quote, get out of the way. gingrich says it's still a two-man race for the nomination and he's fighting on. up next in the nevada caucus, it will be interesting to see what happens there. allison, i want to come to you with some perspective on this. that was quite a solid win for romney yesterday. in terms of how romney is looking at this, do they want gingrich to get out of the way already and let romney take over so that we can have -- we know what we have and see what we're stacking up against president obama? >> absolutely. first of all, markets don't like uncertainty. this battle about the future,

>> how far back do we go with historical data coverage? some of it will depend on what we find as we start digging through pieces of the data. we have seen some issues prior to 2005, and other issues prior to 1999, those are dates we are currently working with right now. it will include everything that we can that will have meeting -- meaning. >> the permit history of the building can be traceable to further back, but what we have here when we're talking about a project, people claim that there is a permit history that we are not privy to. i know maybe not every document or correspondence might be available, but that will be something useful for us to be able to look at. when you decide how far back, it would be great to know. i think it is really important that this is a citywide system, because it will create transparency, and obviously, the city will do better if we can do that. otherwise, this is a really great project, a great step in the right direction. as long as we are cognizant of the fact that the user interface is the most impo

this is a data room. it is a room that is used only when there's trouble and you can sense trouble in this room. it's got two overhead tv monitors, it's got one small com panel in there but it is just filled with gray government desks around all sides where people can start spreading out their records and going over them. we were in the data room and the orange telemetry records were scattered all over. one of the very difficult problems that we faced was that there was no instantaneous data retrieval in those days. it was literally hours from the time we would request a print-out of the telemetry data until we would see them. so the only records that we had to work with were the ones that were in the recorders themselves and a few of the hard copies we could take and make a copy of the television display, a controller was looking at. so we had these pieces of paper and these controllers had been watching the life's blood drain out of the spacecraft and we knew there had been some type of explosion, but t

appropriate to the sensitivity of the data and the risk of the adverse consequences to consumers if that data were to be an accurate and focused collection meaning consumers have a right to reasonable limits on the personal data the companies collect and retain and finally accountability consumers have a right to personal data handled by companies with appropriate measures in place to assure that they adhere to the consumer privacy bill of rights so there you have it seems pretty basic and yet so vague right so let's break down what these proposed points even mean and how it affects us on a daily kind of way let's also take this with a grain of salt because if this gets in acted in a way that they figure out to enforce it what's to say that this bill of rights will be trampled on like the original is on a daily basis especially now that we're in a permanent state of a war on terror joining me from our studio in new york is aaron swartz the executive director of demand progress and thanks so much for joining us tonight and i guess for starters you think this is a good idea that you t

data today although the u.s.ause there was some cold weather as well in the united states and that could affect the workers. >> they get laid off. you're cautiously optimistic. >> cautiously optimistic, yes. that's the title of the note i'm going to write today. >> you heard it here first. good to see you today. thank you for joining us, julian callow at barclays capital. till one hour of programming to go. jackie joins us from the u.s. apart from the employment report, i don't want to diminish the importance of the employment report, jackie, but there's something much bigger and better coming up on sunday. >> absolutely. all eyes are focused on the super bowl and whether the giants will be able to pull out a win against the patriots and i have to tell you even though we're new york-based i am rooting for tom brady because i think he looks better in his tight pants than eli manning does. but, meantime, get this, because you are going to find this interesting, did you know that on super bowl sunday in terms of foo

but as more and more data is being collected, the quality of the data is getting better, but the privacytting less and less. there's a growing mean in the public that the fact that their data is being mined may not be to the best benefit or to them financially. >> i guess the reason i wanted to produce this particular television segment was not to have a privacy debate, but it was because of the specific realization that the community is not valued in the capital structure. so right now the community is treated as either the customer or the product. but what facebook is proving -- because facebook has nothing of value other than the contest of the 845 million users they are now selling to wall street for $100 billion. that's not a moral statement. what i'm saying is if i didn't have a community as an author and host, i would not have capital. and i wonder am i wrong? do you understand what i'm trying to say? do you agree or disagree with that? >> the lead in was the segment of whether we're social pawns in the dynamic. it's an interesting. >> that wasn't the lead in. the lead in was the

of which have to be analyzed which correspond to awfully twenty petabyte of data now twenty petabyte it's difficult to imagine if you would store it on a normal cd without the cover it would be roughly twenty five kilometers city tower now you can imagine that such an amount of data you need a lot of computing power to analyze it quickly and on time so this is why we are connected but of concern because i think hundred forty computing centers all over the world in order to store the data to analyze the data and to board use the results well can't give you a number of but it's a very good very. spread out computing power all over the world where we hear your absolute well when you said it's hard to imagine all actually most of the things that you're working on are hard to imagine my conventional brain well but there is one thing one thing that came from syrian that everybody can imagine that everybody uses i mean that cern introduced the world wide web originally for your own years but now the internet yes it is used by the entire world and it's becoming the most powerful media is the

favorable data out there. what concerned them? they were concerned about fiscal tightening in the u.s., weak housing market and deleveraging from the consumer. also strange financial post "significant downside risk to the economy." also concern that consumer spending growth could slow. there were few members on the upside said job gains could lead to higher incomes and therefore higher spending. inflation overall expected to remained subdued, but of course the hawks expressing their concerns. just a couple quick notes on the staff forecast because it's something that's followed by many of the fed members, the staff lowered in the face of this higher -- better than expected economic data, they lowered their near-term gdp forecast. they still expect the economy to gain in 2012 and 2013. takeaw takeaway, brian, some members see additional qe. a number open to it. there's a couple hard core guys already pencilled it in. >> more on that in a second. we have breaking news right now. government has just rested in the

research organization they're working on the computer center to process the data from experiments to read out and do my children. i have the information that cern really badly needs to use the cool chat of supercomputer is that true. i wouldn't say badly but it would highly very come to have a very good computing center in the russia at a coach out of in-situ would not only for us but in particular also for their version of research as you see the better your infrastructure on computing is the better you can block in into the analysis of the data which we are taking with our experiments and i think it would be a vain vin situation in particular as of our colleagues in russia if we have good computing center at the coach of institute connected to sir you may have read many of. we have many computing side as world wide connected to us and that would also give a fantastic way of connecting into the rest of our computing system birthright you mentioned hundreds of russian researches working in syria what was the role of russian scientists in the experiments on the hadron collider. it's a