incentivize us so we can still eat when we get done doing it but make sure we build business models around building security in from the hardware up. and i think you will see this world change in a few years. >> i thank the panel for the excellent responses. i yield back. >> thank you, doctor. and we are talking about we're going to lock the doors and not let you out until you give us all the ideas we need to do here. we'll let you out today, but seriously, in terms of helping us understand how to get this right, you've got a lot of them in your testimony, but if we could help -- if you could help us drill down more specifically, at least within the jurisdiction we had, we would really appreciate very specific suggestions back. we're going to go now to ms. matsui. >> i would have to say this is probably the most interesting and scary testimony i've ever heard. but i think that, quite frankly, our country doesn't realize what risks we have. and i think the things we hear about over the news are things talk about hacking but they're at a level where -- personal level that people understand.

us consider our trade violations. but it's our own fault at the federal level. not only in terms of incentivizing the use but also making the things. they're good jojobs. china is not investing and subsidizing in wind tunnels out of the goodness of their heart. they could but yet they realize that these are jobs that can be created. and the public is supportive of it. i mean, you know, i live -- most of my district, it keeps changing, but it still has a lot of areas that are along the coast, along the atlantic, along the raritan bay. you may see to, most people don't realize it unless you're from the state. most people think you don't want offshore wind because it's going to affect the tourism industry. just the opposite. every poll i've ever seen shows the opposite. and i've been a strong advocate. i've not received any opposition -- i shouldn't say any -- but any significant opposition to that. and polling shows overwhelmingly that people are even willing to pay more. that they have to pay a couple dollars more. they're willing to do that because they understand from a j job, from an environmen

they see it, can protect that, incentivize us so we can eat when we are done doing it, but build business 340d electronicses from the hardware up, and the world will change in a few years. >> i thank the panel for the excellent response, and, mr. chairman, i yield back. . >> thank you. we're going to lock the doors and not let you out until you give us all the ideas. we'll let you out today, but seriously, in terms of helping us understand how to get this right, you have a lot in your testimony, but if you could help us drill down very specifically at least within the jurisdiction we had, we would really appreciate very specific suggestions back. going now to california and thank you for participating. >> thank you, mr. chairman, and i have to say this is probably the most interesting and scary testimony i've ever heard, but i think that quite frankly our country doesn't realize what risk we have, and i think the things we hear about over the news are things talked about hacking, but they are at a level where personal level to where people understand. this is far beyond that. it really af

incentivize us so we can still eat when we get done doing it, but let's build business models around building security from the hardware up, and i think he will see this world changed in a few years. >> thank you. i yield back. >> we are going to lock the doors and not let you out until you give us all of the ideas that you give us here that we need here. we will let you out, but i need it in terms of we have got to understand in order to get this right. if you could help us grow down in a jurisdiction that we have, we would appreciate very specific suggestions back. we will go down to ms. matsui from california. >> thank you, mr. chairman. the system of the most interesting and at scary testimony i have ever heard. i think that, quite frankly, our country does not realize what risks we have. i think the things we hear about over the news are not necessarily -- it talks about hacking, but it is at a personal level that people understand. this could affect our economy, our country, the way we live. i truly believe this education process is going to be very important. and i also believ

it is inviting them in to give us their ideas and then incentivizing that road to success. that is what i want to celebrate today. thank you for coming in and sharing that celebration. [applause] thank you, mayor lee. this next guest is someone i have interviewed many times on the subject when he was mayor of san francisco. he is very passionate about it. today might be another accomplishment that he may be loud report to being at. please welcome lieutenant governor gavin newsom. >> thank you. [applause] nice to be back. wonderful to see you all. thank you, mayor lee, for your stewardship of this program. president chuiu, everyone here gathered for this milestone. i had the unenviable task of going back to read some of the cliffs that were said to me after we made this announcement, and it was remarkable the condemnation we received. i am glad i never read any of that. maybe i would have been dissuaded. now we have 92% of taxicabs alternative fuel, leading the nation, proven what can be done. there is an old adage. once a mind is stretched, it never goes back to its origina

incentivize us so we can still eat when we get done doing it, but let's build business models around building security from the hardware up, and i think he will see this world changed in a few years. >> thank you. i yield back. >> we are going to lock the doors and not let you out until you give us all of the ideas that you give us here that we need here. we will let you out, but i need it in terms of we have got to understand in order to get this right. if you could help us grow down in a jurisdiction that we have, we would appreciate very specific suggestions back. we will go down to ms. matsui from california. >> thank you, mr. chairman. the system of the most interesting and at scary testimony i have ever heard. i think that, quite frankly, our country does not realize what risks we have. i think the things we hear about over the news are not necessarily -- it talks about hacking, but it is at a personal level that people understand. this could affect our economy, our country, the way we live. i truly believe this education process is going to be very important. and i also believ

how do we incentivize the general public to use these things? most people do not know what is on their computer while they are sleeping. if they knew, they would clean it up. that is why we need these incentives. >> i appreciate that. and i appreciate the committee's indulgence. mr. rogers. >> i know we are short on time. are you familiar with the company that used to be diginotar? >> very much so. >> i think it would be useful for the committee to hear the story and how are a viable company went away within a month >> if you look at the internet when it was created, the little yellow lock that everyone sees on their browser and on their pc, they think they are saved. very few people know what it means. it is supposed to mean a communication path between you and the website you are communicating with, and who is on each end with that. the problem is that in the ssl world, the identity on each side of that may or may not be who it is reported to be. we co-chair a new standard on that called a standard valuation -- standard evaluation because if y

use side. unfortunately, that is what we try to incentivize. they eliminated the requirement and left just these two policy requirements. jurisdictions in order to be eligible have to have been certified housing element and be complete with a street project. commissioner kim: what we specifically pushing for, what was incorporated in obag, do demanded that we have to meet a certain number previously? >> of what we're advocating for, as a prerequisite to these funds, and jurisdictions have in place some anti-displacement policies so that we do not see negative a fax from something we're trying to do. provide housing. there was pushed back from that from the region and we are advocating that that be added back to the final framework. that is something that we'll have to work with commission at avalos and mtc commissioners to get back in. commissioner kim: thank you. >> this is an exciting time frame. we have today -- we have to make a compelling presentation to the joint committee on the historic streetcar expansion project. that would be on marc

, for those of you asking yourself what wonders interstellar travel may hold for all of us, what would incentivize space bunnies. i know this may sound like some sort of fantasy or adolescent dream or science fiction. but if the world's two most notorious "playboy"s get their way, a playboy mansion in the stars may become the initial incentive to load space planes. in fact, the playboy company is making plans for such a facility. here are some renderings shown to space.com. the intergalactic playboy mansion would be on a station on orbit like a cruise ship circling the earth. think of this as the beginning of the whole potpourri of market of places you could stop -- sports stadiums, shopping, all in space. it would include the playboy facility, a zero-gravity dance club, a hotel room where one could float around. that's what they call it in space. with your significant other. a restaurant and a casino game room that includes, get this, in the casino a giant human roulette table. what that means i do not know. but it does look kind of awesome. here would be our sales pitch were they to ask us. bunn

use side. unfortunately, that is what we try to incentivize. they eliminated the

was saying to business, you've got some responsibilities, we want to incentivize, but we also want to hold your feet to the fire, use some sticks against you as well. what role, what responsibility do american manufacturers have to bring jobs back home, to try to get involved to a we're all in it together conversation with government. >> look, david, i could give you a classic laissez-faire capitalist answer, on the one hand, i could say we follow the laws, leave us alone. i don't think that fits today. it doesn't fit overall. i think first and foremost what we owe everybody is to compete and win in every corner of the world. first and foremost, invest in technology, invest in people. take our products, gain market share, fight hard against, you know, all of our global competitors. and probably all three of us -- i don't really have american competitors anymore. all my competitors are german, japanese, chinese. we're kind of like after a hundred years the last man standing in the world we're in. so i'm kind of, love us or hate us, i'm your guy. that's -- so win, number one. but i think, look -- i just think there's

used incentives. we were able to work with the air district as well as county transportation authority to seek secured grants to incentivize the purchase of hybrid vehicles by taxi companies in order to achieve the level of emission reductions that would meet the overall goal. as the lieutenant governor said, cities are the laboratory and innovation. this shows how other cities could bring their taxi fleets as well as to use this to reduce carbon emissions. i first want to thank staff, particularly bob hagen, who has put in many hours of hard work to see this happen. i also wanted to congratulate paul gillespie and all the partners here today who helped to make this possible. we look forward to future collaboration that will have to maintain san francisco's label as the greatest city in america. [applause] >> the bay area air quality management district is in charge of making sure that we follow these regulations. >> as the executive director for the bay area air quality management district, it is my pleasure to recognize the city of san francisco, mayor lee, lt. gov. newsom for their leadership, and demonstrating the fact

using government for different means, right? in your economic plan you would like to incentivize manufacturers. but you are opposed to extending unemployment benefits because you think that's creating too much dependency on the part of government. but isn't that hypocritical when you are using government in the way you see fit to help corporations but not to help people out of work for so long? >> i am glad you asked me that. why are you picking manufacturing, and isn't that picking winners and losers? no, it's not. manufacturers have to compete not just other manufacturers in this country, but they have to compete internationally, directly internationally for jobs to stay in america, and the problem is the government's policy is making manufacturers in this country uncompetitive, and as a result, manufacturing jobs are moving offshore. so if the government is causing the problem, then government has a responsibility to fix the problem. in other words, to change the regulatory environment, which i do in our plan, and to change the tax plan, which i do in our plan, and it's about creating a level

uses. we see a lot of buildings that have replaced surface parking lots which nobody likes. i think we have to incentivize and for the people to eliminate parking or put a below grade rather than try to stop them from having it there are making it more difficult. then the whole thing about bulk and again, allowances that allow heightened the bulk and i think this is an effort to make it possible to have affordable rental and come, because polymer requires some sort of element that has been given to the developer to allow this -- really, there is an appropriate height that should apply to an area that is there for reason. if you start making exceptions for affordable and end up with an overcrowded area and people will have cars anyway and it will be even more congested and if they don't, the way to do it is may be to try to incentivize by a giving fee forgiveness to builders for units, particularly for larger family size units. that's a good way to allow for this thing to happen. we talked a little bit about pricing facilities for parking structures. long-term pricing -- i know there were concerns about th

this race-to-the-top challenge will incentivize governors and state legislatures to join us in keeping tuition costs down. following the president's challenge of keeping college costs down, the senate "help" committee is holding a hearing this week on college affordability. i thank them for that. it is long overdue and i look forward to working with senators harkin and enzi on this i can and let me say that this closing. a hearing that we had just a week or so ago in chicago on the abuse of the g.i. bill education rights by for-profit schools should be a wake-up call to every member of congress. holly petraeus, the wife of general petraeus, testified. she works at the consumer financial protection bureau, an agency which is in the news and controversial because his executive director, richard cordray, who was announced and appointed by the president when the senate refused. the speeches criticize the agency which some republicans loathe and despise. butness it is in the law -- but it is in the law and those who are critical of it should meet. holly petraeus is trying to stop the abuses

how do we incentivize the general public to use these things? most people do not know what is on their computer while they are sleeping. if they knew, they would clean it up. that is why we need these incentives. >> i appreciate that. and i appreciate the committee's indulgence. mr. rogers. >> i know we are short on time. are you familiar with the company that used to be diginotar? >> very much so. >> i think it would be useful for the committee to hear the story and how are a viable company went away within a month >> if you look at the internet when it was created, the little yellow lock that everyone sees on their browser and on their pc, they think they are saved. very few people know what it means. it is supposed to mean a communication path between you and the website you are communicating with, and who is on each end with that. the problem is that in the ssl world, the identity on each side of that may or may not be who it is reported to be. we co-chair a new standard on that called a standard evaluation because if you go even with the la