three, dwelling unit exporsche. it's rigidly -- exposure. by the way.uple of whom are well known to you. and it's the idea that we support the goals of what eastern neighborhoodxd wanted t do but there are still some roughç edges that could be smoothed out. my purpose in coming is asking would you agree to open thank you conversation if we were toq propose changes? it could be to eastern neighborhoods that were from a design perspective. we took this to the eastern neighborhood c.a.c. to. eliminateç the c.e.u. for studç housing in eastern neighborhoods. they adopted it unanimously. and then finally, the conversation that never goes away is the question of p.d.r. and weç all agree that preservg jobs for less educated -- it has to be part of a civici] vision. but it doesn't seem quite to work in a city where now it's -- its chief objective is jobs, jobs, jobs, and in a city that chronically underproduces housing. we're not sure if the p.d.r. question isn't right for a fuller discussion at some point and we don't see a reason to waitç five years. could