so the enterprise use public clouds as untrustworthy, and reliable, and scary, and yet, every single enterprise employee uses it. on the enterprise client, and all their own. and of 40 walks in with their own network nowadays, and the process enterprise data on the rise, and they probably -- it probably drag it into something like dropbox. tim mentioned an interesting statistic of how many people said they were using cloud. the only thing that is interesting is cio's who do not know that they are using every form a cloud that is available. this is the charge again. if the employee wants to be productive, a well-intended employee wants to be productive, just to send an e- mail to a colleague, and bounces off, so they drag it in dropbox and send it publicly, and suddenly all your data is in the cloud whether you like it or not, and the cio has no clue. the consumerization challenge is the challenge for adoption of the cloud. broadly, from an automation perspective, it is the case that for the omission build you a much more reliable concept. i happen to be a passionate fan of the models

and the public clout is been generally branded by the enterprise segment as being untrustworthy unless it is backed by a particular promise to have some major brand like microsoft or google or whatever. what has been lacking has been standards related to a customer of visibility to reason about the cloud. but we have some good anecdotal evidence that people will focus on a cloud for a living will do a far better job than you would ever if you were building your own i.t. system. a good way to think about this would be if you look back on wikileaks and what followed, it turned out they were hosting on amazon, and when amazon pulled that, anonymous launched an attack on a bunch of different web sites. everybody who was running their own data center was down in a heartbeat. so statement one -- if you are running your own thing, you will be taken out much more easily than if you are running as part of a much larger aggregated whole world that provider can defend the property much more rigorously. and goodness me, they care about defending it. but more importantly, through automation, you ge

text which they are more comfortable in reading and analyzing than they are the more shifty and untrustworthy ar artifact. i really question and john styles, a british historian has a wonderful quote. "objects enable the social world to happen, and we need to pay attention to what objects do and how they work," and i think that is a really telling remark. because materials matter, it really is important to think about how -- i'm going to jump a little bit forward. it really matters how we understand how an object might appeal to users and viewers as an item of display as well as an item of knowledge. how can we best understand why a chest of drawers looks the way it is? we can scan pattern books, other contemporary furniture for clues. we need to think about tools and the tactile experience of making that chest on a cabinetmaker's work bench. what are the decisions made not in an intellectual form, but a tactile experience one. objects don't exist just as markers of social stat stus, which is often how they are used. this symbolizes someone is refined or gentile. that is thinking of an object

. >> but he's also proven himself completely untrustworthy. >> i believe in redemption. spent his time in jail. he's done his time. he's just as genuine about taking down the current system as you or i are. he's a very serious guy and a good guy. he wants to help break up the way washington works. >> it's fantastic. the last thing while i've got you, because i have been harassing everybody else, every congressperson who will get in front of me. why do we got have super pac transparency immediately? is there any way that you can marshall your yours, and i can collaborate with you in that regard, to get aggressive advocacy on the ground right now. we have unregulated secret money buying politicians before our eyes. can we get a piece of legislation? >> i think it's very possible. people should go to united republic and sign up. there's another way though with this, dylan. which is that barack obama has talked about what a problem super pacs are. mitt romney has talked about what a problem super pacs are. what would be interesting is for journalists to try to get them on th

supporter of their president but their campaign was a character attack on hillary as a liar and untrustworthy. >> so, you know, the full thought of that was the president didn't do what's happening today which he didn't run negative ads and, you know, he didn't issue that on a daily basis but his company, you know they would admit that it was not an issue contrast. it wasn't a differentiation between hillary and o bamo on health care or the -- obama on health care or that you couldn't count on hillary on a certain set of issues. i think all primaries become difficult and they become a difficult debate. you know, i think the gist of that is basically just like their -- their critique of hillary was character based an not issue based. >> let me show you a clip of the state of the union and get your reaction. >> now, you can call that class warfare all you want. but asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as a secretary in taxes, most americans would call that common sense. we don't be grudge financial success in this country. we admire it. when americans talk about folks like me paying my

people think that he is out of touch, that he's untrustworthy.ons issues of conscience, throws them away like an old pair of sneakers so he can run in the opposite direction. i'm not here to defend rick santorum. the fact he's ten points behind and romney is eight points behind, people know a lot about romney. they don't know a lot about santorum yet. and so i wouldn't render a final judgment on him. romney is upside down on his favorable/unfavorables with independents. he's 44/43 in the ppp poll with republicans. and he's now behind, according to ppp by 15 points in michigan. if that happens, this race is thrown up in the air. >> now let me ask you, chip, i mean, how -- how do you get around what even david brooks says in "the new york times," which i consider conservative, that even if romney gets through all of this with santorum, that the nomination may be worthless because of the damage being done in the process of him trying to win. >> well, we always have this in very tough primaries that we say, oh, whoa is me. this tough primary is hurti

reese "the world is untrustworthy!! if this bill passes, it will be taken advantage of." of."my daughtee po into a women's bathroom and seeing a man's body part. it opens the door forrmore transgenders to be beaten. how many times has this happened? just because something happens one time law that can effect childree." children."gerald "just build extra bathrooms for them. this bill is nonsense. other important issues like healthccre and getting ripped off by traffic caaeras." cameras."graham" i hope it does pass. they are people too. it is such aashame that in this day and time, there must be a law to protect them. 3coming up in our 8 o'clock hour.. o'clock hour.. poming up in our 8 o'clocc hour.. 33&we're not done!you still hav a chance to win that 100- dollar gas card.you're less than an hour away.. stayed tuned to find out how to claim it. you're watching fox 45 morning news.. all local.. all morning. ((break 7)) [ female announcer ] need help keeping your digestive balance? align can help. only align has bifantis, a pantented probiotic that naturally helps maintain your d