. >> we assume the savings and devote them to solvency oft red instead of covering anplace. there has been some confusion about that, in the public, i wanted to be clear that that remains. and, i did clear, follow up, the chairman asked about, the 1% increase if increase as you poundthisystem insurance companies deep side to spend more, charge more than the 1% of the government would no longer pay more than 1% of gdp. that's what you said before. that you would cap it at 1% whu difference. government wouldn't. saves dollars for the government. who would pay those -- assume it's not defined in the budget who would pick up t is there any prevention? is there anything in the budget that doesn't allow the private insurancee more to beneficiaries or competitivd bring us well within the .5% above gdp. >> if it didn't? would be capped at that level. it is the same thing with respect to how the president's proposal works. the ipipap has the same issue. not clear. how it will achieve the savings. >> you embrace the t thuout thet to be made to seniors. if insurers decide they will cha