the optimum tax is not the income tax. it will fall of its own weight, it's impossible and it's just a matter of time before it will have to disappear. with a sales tax or v.a.t., that way would be the ideal but danr until we abolish the 16th amendment which gave the right to income tax, we don't want to put that in. i know a lot of my conservator friends ar basically they acknowledge we're right on this, because we see what happened in europe. they have the income tax, then very low rates, generated a huge amount of money. 5% v.a.t. isn't all that bad. next thing you know you're up to 23%,

the optimum tax is not the income tax. it is just a matter of time before it will disappear. with a sales tax, that would be the ideal but dan and i are in agreement that until we abolish the 16th amendment, we do not want to put that in. i know a lot of my conservative friends are for it. they acknowledge we are right because we see what happened in europe. they started putting in variable-rate. that generated money. 5% is not all that bad. then you have 23%. a lot of them are over 20%. that is a killer. that is one reason europe is in the mess it is. there is only so much blood you can get out of the people. greece is taxed out. they're not paying taxes now. why would they pay them at a higher rate? that makes no sense. and the italians. make it 120%. so what? there are plenty of ways to get around it. a work with money laundering. i can give a lecture on how to launder money. it is very easy to do. we are killing much of the world economy because of these anti- money laundering laws. you have friends in europe to cannot open date accounts because dodd-frank make the liabil

we should give optimum living conditions to the family. children must be protected within their family also. the old laws only protected 2 million children. and i think that we should use my model that would protect 14 million family communities and that would cover the 7 million of children who are not covered now. the chancellor, i know that a lot of people have thought approximate that. but i would like to send youhe f the coalition to help them with the drafting of laws and i would like for you to support my proposal for this model, and for this i need support from the experts who are on top over there. >> translator: goodment send that to me. i think this is a complex theme that takes care of a lot of people and touches a lot of people. it's true that life has changed. a lot of the situations. but it's good to cover the children and the parents. but we only have 100 people, we only have 90 minutes. we don't have a whole lot of time for everybody. it's the rights of children. okay. let's go on. this lady over there next to the gentlema

to manage its economic affairs or will it return to the original notion of limited government and optimum individual liberty driven by an understanding that in america our limited government system works economically when we have strong families. one of the things that you know if you look at just centuries and centuries of authoritarian government is that when you see them concentrate power is when they do two things. either destroy the family and silence the church. so we at the family research council believe that religious liberty is essential to a limited government model and secondly, and primarily economically, we believe strong families are important to economic growth. human capital general rated by young people getting married, staying married and having children and educating those children are hallmarks to our economic prosperity in the future. >> ken blackwell our caller olivia said she doesn't feel that republicans are appealing enough to women, african-americans. we have a story says that women's vote could prove pivotal in the illinois primary. how should candidates make s

interestingly, i think would be as a matter of politics, the optimum outcome for the democrats, for presidentbama as he seeks reelection, there will be a false sense oh, this problem has gone away now when in fact we still have the law which has many horrible features other than the individual mandate. >> and one that becomes instantly unbelievable expensive. the mandate is the financing mechanism. if you take that away what's going to pay for obamacare, the only own to raise taxes and puts the president in a very, very difficult position. >> i think you're going to see the law deferreded for a year, two years, if it gets struck down. and on the politics, think about this. president obama ran against the individual mandate. and now he's-- >> and against-- >> and mitt romney is now running on individual mandate, but implemented it in massachusetts so it's a really weird political issue. >> the blow he politically to the president, if his supreme court overturns, at least even part of this signature achievement would be-- so-called achievement would be a very big deal in the presidential race.

what do you see as an optimum situation there. >> unfortunately on the processed food question, i'm not talking about those mini carrots that come from larger foods that have too much sodium. all of us, americans, eat more processed food than any other country in the world. we are trying through another part i have responsibility for, center for nutrition policy to encourage americans to eat healthier, more fruits and vegetables. my plate is very simple but very effective icon. we are also encouraging access to farmers markets for our -- in your case lone star beneficiaries to try to nudge them, direct them to buying healthier, often locally grown foods. i'm also still, i remain very interested in increasing the requirement for small stores to have better choices of fresh fruits, healthier foods for people rather than just the overabundance of processed food. >> i see my time has expired. thank you very much. >> i think the gentleman's time has expired. i thank the panel of witnesses. i think this was informative. contrary to what might have been perceived, this was a limited hearing, l

services to local entities, by increasing accountability, by achieving economies of scale, by using optimumization. i don't think we're down with that i'm confident within the budget envelope i think we're going to see, we'll be able to reach the target of 6 million, the target of 1.5 million, and the target of 4.7 million. the challenges will be p program and fiscal. the second thing is, we need to see more country skin in the game. we need to see more country commitment to paying. no one wants to see hard-earned hiv or other assistance dollars used to basically supplant existing government investments in health. and secretary clinton has been very forceful and forthcoming on that issue. and i am confident that an increasing number of countries, not all, but increasing number of countries will increase their domestic commitment, they already have and more will. we're also seeing more commitment from other countries and i think we'll see more responsiveness from many of the multilateral organizations ensuring there is effective accountability and use of funds. the third point i'd make is that i'm

the optimum tax is not the income tax. it is just a matter of time before it will disappear. with a sales tax, that would be the ideal but dan and i are in agreement that until we abolish the 16th amendment, we do not want to put that in. i know a lot of my conservative friends are for it. they acknowledge we are right because we see what happened in europe. they started putting in variable-rate. that generated money. 5% is not all that bad. then you have 23%. a lot of them are over 20%. that is a killer. that is one reason europe is in the mess it is. there is only so much blood you can get out of the people. greece is taxed out. they're not paying taxes now. why would they pay them at a higher rate? that makes no sense. and the italians. make it 120%. so what? there are plenty of ways to get around it. a work with money laundering. i can give a lecture on how to launder money. it is very easy to do. we are killing much of the world economy because of these anti- money laundering laws. you have friends in europe to cannot open date accounts because dodd-frank make the liabil

but realistically speaking, even operating at the optimum efficiency, solar and other alternative energyount for perhaps, this is a study, if it's working well and it's not. 16% of the total energy demands. >> bob: that is correct. >> kimberly: bob, look at in terms of the volt. the battery, the 40-hour battery life. that's to say the car 100 years ago. >> eric: this is important news. president obama is going to announce a piece of keystone pipeline from oklahoma to gulf coast. think about that. what does that mean? there is no canadian oil produced in oklahoma. >> dana: okay. i'll try to do this as gently as i can. they completely missed the opportunity to cover themselves politically on this. this is a big deal. when a president calls members of congress himself to say don't vote for the bill. this is a piece of it. you have to start somewhere. but it doesn't do what the states, the private entities say they are willing to do. made other points because i haven't said a word in this block. who doesn't have an all of the above energy policy? there is no one. it depends how you weight it

. >> kimberly: optimum efficiency, if you go solar and the other alternative energy, they can only account 16% of our total energy needs. because of our energy dependence. if you want to bring in nuclear other ways, you have to develop these. it has to be feasible. you can't just dump cash down to support people who give you money politically. >> eric: a bunch of guys with idea about bringing gas prices down, republican candidate for president. southern showdown tomorrow with the republican primary in mississippi, alabama, plus hawaii but greg says that one doesn't count. a fight to the finish among the contenders. listen. >> romney is probably the weakest republican front runner sin leonard wood in 1920. wood ultimately lost on the 10th ballot. >> if i'm weak front runner what does it make newt gingrich? i'm well ahead of him. >> the issue is not math. the issue is vision. mitt romney outspent me 10 to 1 is still not able to close the deal and is not on the path himself to get to this. >> morning, y'all. good to be with you. i got started right this morning with biscuit and cheesy grits.

the goal is to get the children to their optimum weight. >> what is his weight. >> 11. >> he's 3 1/2 years old. >> yes. >> what should his weight be if he was healthy, what -- >> he should be 15? >> yes. >> but he's 11? >> yes. >> this doctor tells his mother don't buy him food from outside. use that money to cook food at home. despite its economic growth, india struggles with persist enthely high rates of malnutrition, far worse than many poorer countries. according to a recent government survey, 42% of children in india under the age of 5 are underweight because they don't get enough food. nearly double that of sub-saharan africa. >> not enough food is just part of the problem. lack of awareness, dirty water, poor sanitation, unhygienic conditions, all of these contribute to india's serious malnutrition problem. getting food is a problem says toto's mother. what does a poor person to do? we eat what we can get. buying food is a daily problem for millions of indians below the poverty line. food security expert says that's a good idea but it's not enough. >> we have to have governmen

is this the optimum time for gingrich, and does anybody think he knows that?you know, the trouble with a lot of this pressure being put on gingrich. here is a man--if i can suspend this belief for a moment and give him credit. he pioneered republicanism in georgia. he was instrumental if not the leader of taking over the house in 1994. there aren't a lot of people alive today over the last 30 years as big of an icon to republican grassroots and a lot of people in elected office he's responsible for that. they got to be careful at trying to push him too hard. but at the same time it is time for him to get out and have some dignity left. >> if he gets out now, though, in the construction--theoretical construction he will been going out and assuming a kind of dick cheney position. santorum would offer him the vice presidential nomination in order to get him out now wouldn't he? >> i don't know, gingrich is such a loose canon. anyone who made gingrich vice president, their food taster would be the food taster. >> ron paul's people have sent signals to romney's peo

i mean, what do you see as an optimum situation there? >> unfortunate on the processed food question, i'm not talking about those many care to come from larger cares, i'm talking about processed foods that has too much sodium and too many trans fats and so on, all of us unfortunately as americans, we eat more processed food in any country in the world. so we are trying to another part that i've responsibility for, the center for nutrition policy, to encourage americans to eat healthier, more fruit and vegetables, my plate is a simple but i think a very effective icon. and would also encourage access to farmers markets, in your case lone star beneficiaries, to try to nudge them, direct them to buying healthier often locally grown foods. but i'm also still, i remain very interested in increasing the requirement for these small stores to have better choices and fresh fruits, healthier foods rather than just the overabundance of processed food. >> i see my time has expired. thank you very much. >> i thank the gentleman. all time has expired.

this quarter of the company is launching a whole new line of products in europe designed to provide optimumr teeth and gums as well as new bath and shower gels approved by dermatologists for helping your skin naturally recover its moisture. in latin america, they're introducing luminous teeth-whitener, speed stick that i use for both men and women that have been very successful in mexico rolling them out across the region. plus, they make the leading antibacterial soap, that's been gaining share in latin america in the last few years. in asia, colgate's coming out with slim soft toothbrush, tapered bristles designed to clean between the teeth and the gum line. remember, they're local. it's not just about the new products. colgate understands that in a cluttered world, they need to adopt innovative marketing tactics. they already have 45 different facebook pages for various brands and they're stepping up investments in digital media. in this focus on relentless innovation that's made colgate a big player in latin america, 35% is operating income. unlike procter & gamble, colgate's products c

a balanced ph in the body is a healthy body, where our systems function to their optimum capacity. >>ave you ever seen a swimming pool when the ph is out of balance? the pool turns green, things start growing in it. our bodies are mostly water-- 80 to 90% water-- so the same thing is happening here. our bodies are very fine machines. with the ph out of balance none of these things are functioning, none of our systems are functioning the way they're supposed to. >> i was so sick for so long, and nobody knew what was going on-- no one-- and i went to all these different doctors, and none, no one could provide a solution. >> my son has autism, so i was looking for something that was safe and natural. >> joint pain, delusional behavior, meltdowns-- sometimes very violent-- and he had a real inability to concentrate. >> announcer: are you tired? have no energy? forgetful all the time? have aches and pains? do you have headaches, migraines, mood swings or depression? do you suffer from digestive problems such as diarrhea, constipation, heartburn and indigestion? the list goes on. these may

still not an optimum commute. when you get to the toll plaza, there's slow traffic there at the taupe, westbound. you will see some -- toll plaza, westbound. you will see some slowing. after that it will be moving to the upper deck of the bay bridge. highway 101 and 280 looking good. so far, there are air delays expected again today. as much as two hours for some flights. you should check with your carrier. 7:09. let's go to mark. >>> good morning, sal. we're taking a live look outside. looking at the oakland estuary with mostly sunny skies. tracking some drizzle. live coverage, the north bay, for geyserville, healdsburg, guerneville and bodega boy, i'm watching this batch move into the san mateo county coastline. as far as our forecast for today, we do have still some more shower chances out there. current numbers we are off to a mild start. you can see napa 55. livermore in the upper 50s and san jose right around 58. remember yesterday we had the persist. rainfall acoing the area. that -- across the area. that s

we should give optimum of living conditions to the family.he children must be protted within their families also. old w will be protected 2 million children, and i thinko that we should use my model that would protect 14 million family communities that would cover? 7 million children who are not covered now.íííí chancellor, i know there's a lot of people that have thoughtñ about that, but i would like to send you a whole proposal to the parties of the coalition to heló them with the drafting of the law, and i would like for you to support the proposal so this model, and for this i need support from the experts that are up there. good, said that to me, and i think that this is a complex scheme that takes care of a lot of people and touches a lot of people. it's true that the life has changed a lot of situations, but it's good to cover the children and the parents. but we only have 100 people, we have 90 minutes, so we don't have a lot of time for everybody. the rights of children -- okay, let's go on. this lady over there. next to the

will it return to the original notion of limited government and optimum individual liberty, driven byderstanding that in america, are limited government works best when we have strong families. centuries and centuries of authoritarian government -- when you see them concentrate power is when they do two things. either destroy the family and silence the church. we get the family research council believe that religious liberty is essential to a limited government model. secondly and primarily economically, we believe the strong families are important to economic success and economic growth. human capital generated by young people getting married, saying married, and having children, and educating those children are hallmarks to our economic prosperity in the future. host: a caller does not believe they are killing two women. a story in "the washington post" -- they are appealing to women. guest: i think you speak to those needs and the issues and visions of women. you know, sometimes we partition the american aspiration along gender lines and racial lines too finely. most people want th

we should give optimum of living conditions to the family.he children must be protected within their families also. old law will be protected 2 million children, and i thinko that we should use my model that would protect 14 million family communities that would cover? 7 million children who are not covered now.íííí chancellor, i know there's a lot of people that have thoughtñ about that, but i would like to send you a whole proposal to the parties of the coalition to heló them with the drafting of the law, and i would like for you to support the proposal so this model, and for this i need support from the experts that are up there. good, said that to me, and i think that this is a complex scheme that takes care of a lot of people and touches a lot of people. it's true that the life has changed a lot of situations, but it's good to cover the children and the parents. but we only have 100 people, we have 90 minutes, so we don't have a lot of time for everybody. the rights of children -- okay, let's go on. this lady over there. next to

i mean, what do you see as an optimum situation there?>> unfortunate on the processed food question, i'm not talking about those many care to come from larger cares, i'm talking about processed foods that has too much sodium and too many trans fats and so on, all of us unfortunately as americans, we eat more processed food in any country in the world. so we are trying to another part that i've responsibility for, the center for nutrition policy, to encourage americans to eat healthier, more fruit and vegetables, my plate is a simple but i think a very effective icon. and would also encourage access to farmers markets, in your case lone star beneficiaries, to try to nudge them, direct them to buying healthier often locally grown foods. but i'm also still, i remain very interested in increasing the requirement for these small stores to have better choices and fresh fruits, healthier foods rather than just the overabundance of processed food. >> i see my time has expired. thank you very much. >> i thank the gentleman. all time has expired. i

i think it can't -- we have to ensure that we make optimum use of all of the funds entrusted to us, but i am impressed by what it strong commitment is to global health generally, and hiv specifically. >> thank you. what we are hearing now in talking to different interests on the hill and elsewhere who are puzzling over the budgetary realities, those who are sympathetic and part of this coalition, but nonetheless we thinking, what we're hearing is yes, indeed, there have to be more skin in the game from some of the country. we're hoping that the multilateral institutions that have been very fragile and brittle themselves, that they will return and be stronger. but there's also an increased discussion around how do you present to an american public what the endgame, the endgame may be the wrong term. that implies an exit. but a vision looking out for, five years, or 10 years, that tells a narrative to the american people that it's different than what a few years ago seen in the emergency phase seemed like somewhat open-ended and ill-defined area looking for. can you say something about th

will it turn to the original motion of limited government and optimum individual liberty driven by an understanding that in america, our limited government system works economically when we have strong families? one of the things that you know if you look at just centuries and centuries of authoritarian governments is that when you see them concentrate power is when they do two things -- either destroy the family and silence at the church. we at the family research council believe that religious liberty is essential to a limited government model. secondly, and primarily economically, we believe that strong families are important to economic success and economic growth. human capital generated by young people getting married, stay married, and having children and to getting those children are hallmarks to our economic prosperity in the future. host: ken blackwell, the caller said that she did not feel that republicans were appealing to women, african- americans. story in "the washington post" says that the women's vote could be pivotal in the illinois primary to the candidates get the

we should give optimum living conditions to the family.he children must be protected within their family. protected 2s only million children. -- laws only protected 2 million children. if we should use my model, we will protect 14 million family communities. that will cover 7 million children who are not covered now. mrs. chancellor, i know a lot of people have thought about that. i would like to send you a whole proposal to the parties of the coalition to help them with the drafting of laws. i would like for you to support my proposal for this model. for this, i need support from the experts. >> good. send that to me. i think this is a context -- complex thing that takes care of a lot of people. life has changed a lot of situations. it is good to cover the children and the parents. >> we only have 90 minutes. we do not have time for everybody. let's go on. this lady over there. >> home for several generations to meet. this exists already. is this the most important subject for the future? >> yes. i see often that old people are living alo

i mean, what do you see as an optimum situation there? >> unfortunate on the processed food question, i'm not talking about those many care to come from larger cares, i'm talking about processed foods that has too much sodium and too many trans fats and so on, all of us unfortunately as americans, we eat more processed food in any country in the world. so we are trying to another part that i've responsibility for, the center for nutrition policy, to encourage americans to eat healthier, more fruit and vegetables, my plate is a simple but i think a very effective icon. and would also encourage access to farmers markets, in your case lone star beneficiaries, to try to nudge them, direct them to buying healthier often locally grown foods. but i'm also still, i remain very interested in increasing the requirement for these small stores to have better choices and fresh fruits, healthier foods rather than just the overabundance of processed food. >> i see my time has expired. thank you very much. >> i thank the gentleman. all time has expired.

we should give optimum of living conditions to the family.he children must be protected within their families also. old law will be protected 2 million children, and i thinko that we should use my model that would protect 14 million family communities that would cover? 7 million children who are not covered now.íííí chancellor, i know there's a lot of people that have thoughtñ about that, but i would like to send you a whole proposal to the parties of the coalition to heló them with the drafting of the law, and i would like for you to support the proposal so this model, and for this i need support from the experts that are up there. good, said that to me, and i think that this is a complex scheme that takes care of a lot of people and touches a lot of people. it's true that the life has changed a lot of situations, but it's good to cover the children and the parents. but we only have 100 people, we have 90 minutes, so we don't have a lot of time for everybody. the rights of children -- okay, let's go on. this lady over there. next to