for example, statementmissible of miranda warnings because we cannot expect to administer warnings to an enemy capturesbattle. but instead a military judge may make other findings frijs th in instance, that the statement is reliable and made voluntary. the framework and the promise of our military commissions which is why i've sent several cases to the reformed commissions for prosecutions. there is quite simply no inherent contradiction between using military commissions in appropriate cases while still prosecuting other terrorists in civilian courts. without question there are differences between these systems that must be and will continue to be weighed carefully. such decisions about how to prosecute suspected terrorists are core executive branch functions. in each case prosecutors and counterterrorism professionals across the government conduct an intensive review of case-specific facts designed to determine which avenue of prosecution to pursue. in several practical considerations affect the choice of forum. first of all, the commissions only have jurisdiction to prosecute indiv