from district 10 down to district 6. that would break with some of the principles you have been working with. that would move major boundaries of our district and that would prevent us from achieving that principle. i like the current configuration in district 9. the district 9 supervisor has that in mind as well as the community unity map has that in mind as well. when it comes to district 11, i am concerned we need to make sure that we're keeping a list -- district 11 hold. right now we have the current map. it makes sense to have the boundary at holloway. it is more african american north. that boundary makes sense. we're also losing ocean avenue as part of the corridor in district 11. thank you for your time. >> thank you. >> good evening. members of the public as well as commissioners. it is nice to see a. i am malia cohen. i am a representative of district 10. i come to support the voice of many of the neighbors you have heard here about keeping the portola whole. i would like to see it in 10 and i would welcome th

mcdonnell: we will go district by district. district to we did. -- district 2 we did. let's take that vote. here is the vote. whether to go all in with each of the districts as described by the consultants with the exclusion of the parentheses for the purposes of the task force. ms. lam: is your recommendation that only the consultants get highlighted, or just incorporated into the list before us? mr. schreiber: my proposal was that when we use the consultant list of a neighborhood, we do not include the parentheses when we do so. ms. lam: thank you. mr. mcdonnell: as everyone clear on the question before us? we have submitted descriptions of the districts submitted by the consultants. the question before us, a, remove the parenthetical statements from the description, and b, utilize this list of neighborhood descriptions with the exception of district 1, which you already voted to do differently, as the information that will fill this section. ms. tidwell: i would ask that we separate the questions. mr. mcdonnell: first question, to remove the parenthetical statements

i am peter strauss from the lower haight and district 5 and district 8. it looks like i will be staying in district 8. we have reached the bottom of the night. i am. -- i am sure it feels more like the bottom of the 54th. baseball analogies aside, there are a bunch of us here to make one last pitch. in 55 laguna into district 5. we have talked about community and compromise. we have gusty to recognize haight is the spine of the community and should not be treated as a border. we appreciate what you have done in the commercial destroyed by moving the boundary down. the closest to a win win would be able to split the property. i understand that is beyond your purview because it involves changing precinct boundaries. it may be that is the direction we need to go. most of us would be willing to work with supervisor wiener to achieve the closest to a win- win, but we may not be in to do that at this time. i urge you to establish the baseline at the most logical and consistent place with their review your purview. we believe that would be to establish 55 laguna

in anticipation of the comments, if that goes back into district 5, district 1 will creep into district 2. i know there was discussions before and i wanted to share some thoughts in terms of core areas of district 2 i hope will remain if they jordan park is a core part of district 2. there was a discussion about the lake street corridor from arguello. that is a core part of district 2 in shares the same population with the rest of the district as well as a cliff and the core part of sea cliff. it has been an integral part of district 2 and i sincerely hope that we keep it that way. i want to thank you for your hard work along this time line and to echo what supervisor chiu said. we are all going to be excited to represent our constituents. >> tommy gallegos. what is your name? euronext. this woman is first. -- you are next. ok. again, our next speakers >> you have heard from more than a dozen residents of the panhandle area north and south, east and west saying, please keep it all together. i myself live on oak street. i am very much aware of the issues that are on the north side of the

district 9, -- district 8, 3.58%. >> district 9, 4.84%. district 10, -0.91%. district 11, 4.94%. chairman mcdonnell: thank you. >> could you repeat district for? >> -4.90. chairman mcdonnell: going back up to russian hill. can you give us the population of that highlighted area and deviation? >> that is a population of 202 people, bringing the deviation for district 3 to -3.70% and the deviation for destitute to - 0.519%. commissioner alonso: no. commissioner melara: come back to me. yes. commissioner melara: could you tell me what the boundaries are? >> lombard, greenwich, and leavenworth. chairman mcdomelara: did we have testimony around us? >> we've received from don -- predominantly on monday. commissioner melara: yes. commissioner pilpel: yes. commissioner schreiber: yes. commissioner tidwell: no. commissioner melara: yes, because of the school. i am concerned about the other things that need to be done. chairman mcdonnell: thank you. please make this change and let's move to the other part of lake. if we could see the population for the block between 25th and 26. lake and c

the difference in character between mr. 9 in district 6 is remarkable -- between districts 9 and districts remarkable. have we seen nonprofits stopping displacement? no. we are seeing a bunch of new residential development projects. the nonprofits have been awol. it has been a neighborhood-based operation. the eastern neighborhoods and nonprofits lost it and say they want to be part of the neighborhood. they blew it. we're seeing displacement more than before the plan. you are more likely to lose -- the population was in eviscerated. i do not think there is a connection. the issues of north mission are in sync with the mission proper. my neighborhoods are centered around a marshall school. d9 is a progressive district. i have a problem thinking there will be any sort of disenfranchisement of anyone in our community in the north mission is included in district 9. invoking walter again without my singing, "love will keep us together." please keep the mission together. [laughter] >> thank you, sir. >> i do not know how i can follow on that. i cannot sing. i do want to thank you all for your

it also resembles district 11 more ethnically than district 8. and so it has a very high latino population. it more resembles the other parts of district 11. that is able to move back into the district and be more harmonious. that would be very helpful in keeping the neighborhood goal. >> hello, i am from district 5. i wanted to speak about the area near the panhandle are rows of street. there are several e-mail that i received this morning from members and residents of that area that were very alarmed to find that they were no longer in the district after being in the district for 20 years or so. when i spoke about the lower pay, they came up and constituents raised with me because of the involvement and that the district supervisor before me, as a member of the planning commission, in the development, the project at 55 lagoon of. the supervisor was conflicted and not able to participate. we are fine at remaining in a, but we would be happy with it coming to five. we feel that those interests will be responded to regardless of where is. there ar

we have had no voice in district 9. >> i like the neighborhood. >> i am in district 10. i had already submitted this earlier on but i wanted to get this into the record. this is some community letters as well as petitions from the community. i am a 25-year resident and i am a former president of the -- as well as the district 10 council. i urge you to respect the wishes of our community and keep the portal undivided and within the boundaries of district 10. your predecessors on the 2002 task force curry-demus our community when we were -- task force damaged our community when we were split down the middle. they separated from the remainder of district 9 by a physical barrier as well as barriers in our demographics and our socio-economic status. that left a large segment of our community voiceless for the last 10 years. the prior commission failed to follow the federal voting act equal protection clause guidelines by weakening of the electoral voice of racial minorities in our community when a large portion of the largely or 50% asian community was partitioned away from t

if you are trying to keep district 6 as a 1% district, that may be impossible.is offered based on where we are now and europe at the peak of your understanding. just one moment of your unbiased thought -- we have been pinned down for six months with no help from our supervisor's office with a predictable outcome

and moves into district 8. i am part of a community organization that has been organizing with neighborhood residents for a number of years. some of the issues have the united neighborhood residents and based on common experience. many of the working families have also been tied together by the need to advocate for more affordable housing. for strategies to create jobs and economic opportunities, this is a working-class neighborhood , every day families celebrating culture. and i think it is a disservice to move those locked out of the neighborhood that they have been tied together for many generations. i would propose the boundaries to safeguard the in integrity of district 11. >> [reading names] one second and i'll start your time. are there more names on the list over there? can you check for me? thank you very much. >> my name is michael sanchez. also, they're trying to chang e the district 8, take it away from exelsior. i don't think that's very good. because i think we need more help and for jobs in creat

i am peter strauss from the lower haight and district 5 and district 8. district 8. it looks like i will be staying

, district 7. i do not know where that came from. he has double checked and he will be writing the tube. we would prefer that it remained in split and that is what the university wants to be, in multiple districts. in any case if you were to put it in one, put it in five. the second issue is that in the course of attempting to satisfy the demands for folks in the northern area, japantown and the african american area in central, in the southern section in the lower haight, i would ask that you not move the inner sunset, district for any further into the inner sunset and leave it where you have got it at 15th avenue. thank you. vice-chair lam: thank you, next speaker. >> good evening. when i speak, could i please have the picture on the screen? i am from san francisco state university and a half 11 reasons why this of state should stay in district 11. more than-[unintelligible] services are offered to the district 11. there is 15,000 hours of service offered to people who live in that district. that

district 3,-[inaudible] district four, district 5, 2.12%, district 6, 0.87%. district 7,--2.8%. district 8, at 2.304%. district 9, 4.84%. district 10, -0.91%. district 11, 4.94%. >> thank you. >> could i go back to 7 and 8? >> give me the population related proposals before we go to non-population related. >> can i propose something? if not -- is not a proposal to change anything. i am looking at our numbers. unless there is an urgency to add or delete something in some neighborhood, i would say that we probably want to just stop because we are within the numbers we want to be in every district. and so i am afraid that if we move something we will end up living something else and restoring some of the things we're already -- we had put on the map and people had believed we were going to put it. and leave it there. i am concerned about that. >> i would ask we take a 10 minute break to collect ourselves and insure there is nothing else we want to do. que>> if we are -- if that will create a massive ripple, problem among ourselves, i say stock. any move will make anywhere is going

district five. >> rita evans, rose hillson. >> thank you very much for this opportunity to speak today. i have lived in the sunnyside neighborhood for 26 years and shortly after moving there became aware of the sunnyside neighborhood association which i soon joined and became active in and found that group had been formed in the mid 1970's to promote the neighborhood and in particular and try to do something to restore and maintain our neighborhood gem, the sunnyside conservatory. our landmark historic neighborhood gem, the sunnyside conservatory was restored just a few years ago with neighborhood volunteers and many, many sunnyside residents have been involved in the restoration and maintenance of that facility and solicitting the funds for it and so far. sunnyside elementary is at the part of the neighborhood. we have the sunnyside park just renovated two years ago. we do indeed have a very clear neighborhood identity. our boundaries have been clearly documented in every newsletter since the mid-1

see masonic itself with support from district 1 and district 2. i want to make sure we are not letting these horrible scars throughout their neighborhood. let's use that to build better streets and better communities and bring people together rather than divide them. thank you for your time. >> good evening. i am here to speak for my professor. he is a man who lives in district 1. he sent me here today because he does not want them handling the -- district 1. the asian population is not going to have their voice in district 1. that is it. >> thank you. >> you're welcome. chairman mcdonnell: the last two named trade is there anyone else to offer public comment tonight? >> the evening. -- good evening. i am resident of district 5 and i am here to echo the comments previously with respect to keeping the area in district 5. is the committee's interest and i think this last-minute change was televised. thank you. chairman mcdonnell: thank you very much. >> good evening. i am a candidate for district 5 supervisor. i hear that the current lines of moving

or a 5% district. all my earlier comments were based on 1% district. and a 5% district solution is a very different thing. my public, it would have been, if i had known you were considering that, it probably could a f unlessulsome. be less fullsume. as far as to is going to be here in 10 years from now, life is for learning. >> thank you, sir. >> tess wellborne. a somewhat tired person. a couple of things on the report. the list that i see and hear includes a large number of institutions to are by definition nnot neighborhoods. i suggest you find a way to address that one way or another. second, i am curious about leaving out communities of interest. because there are many discussions related to that. i can see advantages and disadvantages to it. but i flag it as a possible sticky wicket, especially because some of them got pretty sensitive. thank you. >> thank you, ma'am. thank you, all, for public comment on i am number4. moving to 5. the number are there any member reports? hearing none, and public

or in district 9. i know there were several comments made, and i appreciate that, but i also appreciate other comments as well. that was my interpretation of the comments we heard tonight on the placement. i think i agree with most of the comments that have been made that if we are going to draw it into a large degree, we are better signaling our thoughts and saving that for our next meeting, and if we want to do that for all sorts of changes, i think that might be useful. i do think anticipating the next couple meetings, we should expect to have fairly lengthy mapping sessions. we do not have much time left. we agreed we should have an interim deadline to settle before the 14th so we can concentrate on finishing the report. >> given the comments from task force members, i would propose that we hold off this evening, but discussing areas for consideration, and we will focus on on the drawing for next week. since our deliberations, we have not had discussions or conversations, so this may be the opportu

if you are trying to keep district 6 as a 1% district, that may be impossible.is offered based on where we are now and europe at the peak of your understanding. just one moment of your unbiased thought -- we have been pinned down for six months with no help from our supervisor's office with a predictable outcome that only proves that point. >> thank you, sir. >> good morning, a task force. i am the managing director of the studio located in the south of market area, a filipino- american performing arts center. i am a longtime worker there and also a former resident. i am here to echo what all the other philippine constituents have talked about as far as maintaining the border on 15th street between valencia and harrison. what everyone else failed to mention is the reason why we want to go that far, besides the density population of filipinos, is because one of my favorite coffeehouses is over there. filipinos really love coffee. [laughter] seriously, historically as you know, filipinos have been an essential part of the south of market area. that is very inclusi

the district descriptions, the individual district maps. there was something else. >> the final map, district descriptions, district statistics. mr. mcdonnell: yeah, that word, statistics. >> caskey timing question? mr. mcdonnell: yes. >> some of these pieces will take some time to prepare, but i assume the task force will want to publish immediately. would it be possible to add a note saying, "to be added"? mr. mcdonnell: yes. >> and then we will replace it. mr. pilpel: or along those lines, could we allow the publication of an executive summary when all of these pieces exist, so the map itself is available immediately, and as these pieces are assembled in the next couple days, then the final report will then exist? mr. mcdonnell: i don't think she was referring to the final map. but the final map will take time. mr. pilpel: all right. mr. mcdonnell: ok. with respect to the report -- >> yes, on the list of appendices, we're going to include the statistics and the community newspaper advertisements? mr. mcdonnell: yes. >> ok. >> man asked t

aviation the district 5, 2.0. deviation of district 1, -5.23%. appreciate that there is another move for the late corridor. >> yes. >> yes. >>yes. >> yes. >> yes. >> no. >> yes. >> thank you. please make this change. lake st.. >> if we could start with the block between 25th and 26. >> that block has a population of 331 people bringing the deviation for district 12 - 4.78%, and the deviation of district two two -5.08%. >> can we look at the other side of lake st.? >> can i make one observation? i believe if we reversed our decision about the median strip, i think that what allowed us to stay within 5% and move the 64 people back to d2. we would be finished, i think. >> so proposed. >> i think this is actually two changes together the i am proposing. that we move this block, and then as the second accompany an adjustment, to move the three blocks, the median strip -- strips, i guess -- >> yes. >> with 64 people back from d3 to d2. >> ok, anyone have any questions? the proposal is -- one second, let me just take it one more time and come back to yo

we're going from one housing unit in r districts to -- our districts to district 4 that may be permitted. the department is concerned the but deflation remove the one unit limitation in place and the lack of review for group housing. we're recommending only one unit be allowed as of right now and group housing be eliminated from this section. the third item deals with surface parking lots in the c3 district. the legislation would remove the provision in the code that allows surface parking lots in c3 districts to operate in perpetuity. the department supports this change because it is consistent with the downtown plan in the general plan. we are rec meinecke -- recommending clarifying language. i would like to point out that clarifying language in my executive summary is not t-- is correct when i list the recommendations. it spells out the use has to terminate within five years from this ordinance being adopted, not immediately. the next session is the washington broadway sud. another thing i would like to point out that was brought to my attention yesterday, the map included in your pac

to balance the district. chairman mcdonnell: let's go to lake street. >> i am happy to make a proposal. in order. i would propose that we move the boundary to ninth avenue. >> that is the population of 1006 people. the deviation is to -6.51% and the division for district 3. >> that is between lake and california? >> yes. >> district 1 deviation would be - six. wife -- would be -6.51%. >> we can only take one at a time? could we do both? >> the other one -- side would be between 27 and 28. >> adding that would bring the total highlighted area to 1880 people. the deviation for district 1 would be -4.95% and the deviation for district 2 would be -6.76%. >> i would add just one more area at the end by the park, that little sliver that used to be in toward the west. >> that is in d1. >> move back to d1. >> that is in d1. >> it is? it does not look like it. >> there are houses of there. >> we're not sure what area you are talking about. >> just -- delbamar. >> same block. >> you cannot see them because airlines fol

deviation for district 3 it is 3.84%. district 4 is -5.6%. deviation for district 5 is 9.6%. deviation for district 6 is 0.96%. deviation for district 8 is 3.47%. deviation for district 9 is 4.8%. deviation for district tennis is -0.87%. deviation for district 11 is 4.94%. >> thank you. giving you a pause for consideration. any final population tweaks? mr. alonso. any final population tweaks ? commissioner alonso: no. commissioner leigh: no. commissioner melara: no. commissioner mondejar: no more. commissioner pilpel: i tried and tried and tried. >> did we want to hear about this? you said you would fight until the end. thank you, that was helpful. commissioner schreiber: we are good with where we are right now. >> with respect for deviation? >> and it may be helpful that that will not be kept under 5. >> 4.998%. >> thank you. >> the only thing i was looking at was that other we're border. >> close your eyes. just kidding. >> you go west of that. and there is a hill at the top about. >> give them direction, please. just to the left of the block. >> that is a population of 36