engelsby, but also dr. engilsby expressing some concern about the decision. dr. keim, why don't you begin? >> first off on the committee, we are again a board of 25 high ly qualified individuals and we rarely agree upon anything. >> sounds like congress. >> i know. awe although we may not be highly qualified. >> i must say we actually embrace this dissent and weep use it and we cherish the different members and their opinions and it's true for this particular example as well. i did, this was in fact, a letter that was meant for an internal type of a process for us to understand in a retrospective fashion what we had done and what we had come through and it was as such, i view it as a very constructive type of communication. it was unfortunate that it was leaked and it became part of the public dialogue. it makes it harder to have a constructive and proactive type conversation there. many things you said are worth examining. one point that he makes in the letter is in fact there was a bias in the witness list. i think that -- that is true. the primary witnesses th