the account of the conversation made by fred michelle contained a number of exaggerations. that is exactly why we have the lord justice looking into this whole matter, someone who is independent who will get to the bottom of it. >> the secretary of state has said that he did not know of the continent between the communications between his advisers and bskyb, but he knew they were happening and it would publish all of the communications between his department as andbsky -- and bskyb. why weren't the communications he did know of not included. we know the prime minister did discuss the bid on the 23rd of december. did the prime minister act in a transparent manner by communicating what he said to his department from the 23rd of december or thereafter. ? >> the prime minister did not communicate with me any communications he had. he is not responsible for this bid. i am solely responsible for this bid. with respect to the communications, i did not know the contents of the communications until yesterday when i saw them. nor did i know the volume of the communications. i knew th

now, the commission pointed to more than 100 e-mails between murdoch and senior europe lobbyist fred michelle mainly concerning uk regulators launching the review of b sky b. a lot of that communication the commission said was illegal, pointing the blame toward regulators sending news corp. shares flying. that's a trend that can continue depending on what rupert murdoch says for the rest of this week. tyler. >> let's go to sue down at the exchange. >> that's right, ty. we had a triple digit loss as you know yesterday. triple digit gain earlier in the dow. we're edging back up towards that. what should you focus on? art cashin is here. good to see you, my friend. >> good to see you. i'm glad you're here. i can't wait to see you on the new set. >> i'm going to be bugging you every day. i'm back home. talk to me about what you're watching. i know you were watching the euro and the dollar earlier. a little bit of a strengthening in the euro because the dutch managed to get their auction off pretty well considering the problems there. >> yeah. there was not nearly as much damage as was originally

house today and say what the truth was or otherwise of the account of the conversation made by fred michel which we know in other instances contains a number of exaggerations. but that's exactly what we've got lord justice leveson looking into this whole matter, as someone independent, a judge, a high court judge who will get to the bottom of it. >> the secretary of state has said that he did not know of the content of the communicate his between his special adviser and bskyb. but he did note that there happening and he did assure this house that he would publish all the communicate between his department and bskyb. why were those communications that he did know of, even though he says he did know the content, and weather conditions gushed that they can indication between the prime minister after his meeting that we know the premise of did discuss the bid on the 23rd of december, and the prime minister act in a transparent manner by communicating what he had said to his department on the 23rd of december or thereafter, either in person to the secretary of state or the means of his official

can he explain how fred michele was in a position to tell murdoch the full details of the statement theecretary of state was not going to give to this later?ntil two statedays there can be no doubt that the e-mail describes meetings that the secretary of state has had as foretold what the secretary of state was going to do. either he was mistaken -- when it comes to the transparency, the secretary of state comments, there appears to be a great deal of transparency . it has been suggested that he was negotiating with murdoch. why didn't he tell opponents to the bid and the house? is that what he said is going on? he published details on all the exchanges between his department and news corp. in light of the information, does he still maintains that that's the case? his activities when too far at times and he has resigned. it is the secretary of state who is responsible -- this is a controversial bid. he could have referred it to the competition commission, but he did not. his role was to be impartial but he was not. his contract fell far short. the reality is that he wasn't judging this

michel chossudovsky director of the center for research on globalization says syrian rebels fred from the outside with weapons aren't interested in giving up the fight for the free syrian army of the foot soldiers of the western military alliance and they are advised by the best foreign military commanders we know that special forces on the ground french military officers were arrested in late february the thing was hushed up but the big truth is that the western military alliance has been waging a code word war using the free syrian army. for all the media know. this free syrian army doesn't represent anybody in syria the opposition is not an opposition is a bunch of thugs and terrorists and that made by the western military alliance and that the trial cities which are blamed on the uk a bit by the free syrian army and ultimately the free syrian army is on the payroll of the western military alliance so that you can have a ceasefire called by the so-called international community when the members of the international community i'm fact involved in the conflict the deadlines passed fo

michele and mr. cable. is that right? >> i am not sure i recall fred being on the telephone or not but he was there with me. it was a direct call to mr. cable from the other day we announce the proposal to make an offer. >> the call went well. he did say there would not be -- would not be a policy issue in this case and mr. michele -- we should have reported him -- in a sense that is ironic on two levels. he didn't see much on top of it. made the announcement. you told him in relation to the size of our group, and i will ask you about it. the cable said it is coming as planned. >> it is the annual -- in june around this time and summer party for every one. it is an advertiser or some politicians, partners, executives and so on. a big party that we throw. >> the next stage, 01643, again to mr michele, to you, mr. anderson copy it and we discussed who he is. he said mr. mitchell speaking. have a call from hunt's adviser. this is a time when mr. hunt has no relationship to the decision. is that correct? >> he didn't have a role until the end of december.

michele and mr. cable. is that right? >> i am not sure i recall fred being on the telephone or not but he was there with me. it was a direct call to mr. cable from the other day we announce the proposal to make an offer. >> the call went well. he did say there would not be -- would not be a policy issue in this case and mr. michele -- we should have reported him -- in a sense that is ironic on two levels. he didn't see much on top of it. made the announcement. you told him in relation to the size of our group, and i will ask you about it. the cable said it is coming as planned. >> it is the annual -- in june around this time and summer party for every one. it is an advertiser or some politicians, partners, executives and so on. a big party that we throw. >> the next stage, 01643, again to mr michele, to you, mr. anderson copy it and we discussed who he is. he said mr. mitchell speaking. have a call from hunt's adviser. this is a time when mr. hunt has no relationship to the decision. is that correct? >> he didn't have a role until the end of december.