mr. donaldson suggested. that would involve nonprofits. >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good evening, supervisors. >> can you speak right into the mike, please? >> i am sorry. a member of occupied staff, and modern schrader of santoses go free freedom fighters against foreclosure. i will also -- in 2006, my house was embezzled. i was in court for six years. last july 15, the court returned the property to me. 45 days later, bank of america bought my house for $275,000 for my embezzlers. now they are threatening to evict me. this means that that is the home that i have bought from my child, who died. all of my memory of my child is there. most -- people of color who worked all their lives to secure something for the future of our children, who are being deprived of our dignity and life possessions. there initiating a petition addressed to vicky to demand that she does not enforce the foreclosures. also, encouraging people to transfer their business and personal phones to corporate banks from corporate banks -- from corporate banks to credit unions. think

mr. donaldson, is what is happening in boston. there is the public-private partnership that the mayor has been talking about in other aspects. you have the work being done with the hedge fund, i wonder if there is a way to do something like that. you are buying back properties, and selling them to people at an affordable price. and given some of the efforts that have been undertaken with the private sector, there is a possibility to do something like that. >> this is an excellent point. we talked about that model, we have the enterprise and the stakeholders' meeting, and we have some information, where we start at the next meeting -- we will delve into that and look at what the model will look at in the san francisco setting. supervisor avalos: next up, we have from the sheriff's department, holmes and garcia. >> thank you for inviting us to take part in this. i am here with john garcia. and the head of the civil section -- responsible for the evictions. he will hand out something to circulate to you. as you all know, the sheriff'

mr. ed donaldson. >> thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak before the commissioners. i want to speak in support of staff recommendations, that the building be used in a way that is consistent with the mitigation agreement and that we look at the impacts and to measure things in terms of impact at outcomes and we think about it in a visionary kind of way. one person said vision. san francisco spent $6.7 billion a year and it has a multiple of 10 which means that $67 billion per year is used in the city of san francisco. we should use the facilities in a way where we began to leverage opportunities seriously said that we can take advantage of some of those opportunities that are coming out of this resource rich city. i would say that serious consideration be given so as if they are moved, that they would be moved in such a way to a neutral site as was mentioned by mr. jackson so that those services can continue to remain in the community. >> thank you very much. that is all the points i have this time. are you supposed to be speaking of all of these costs? item 15 was w

donaldson, henry, vicksburg? you lose an entire army so that's one of gallagher's arguments against this, the stuff doesn't actually work because -- mr. conners? >> i'm going to say i think there's definitely something to do with the opposing generals. he -- >> explain. >> he has a really good read on people like mcclelland or even burnside. burnside has this problem where he'll freeze up when he's given too much. it's shown -- kind of burnside -- it takes him a long time to get across that bridge. burnside can be taken advantage of and exploited as can mcclelland obviously. mcclelland will break if pushed right, but he doesn't get that good a read when it comes to grant. >> yes, i think and while -- also what should be added good read on the army of the potomac. there's something deeply wrong of that. i don't know if historians have done a great job -- even bruce cannon talks about this. they fight really hard, its rank and file are pretty effective but its generals -- kind of an organizational problem. partly because of mcclelland because a lot of the officers he selects and the culture he creates is a very defensive passive-minded

donaldson, henry, vicksburg. >> you lose all of your troops. >> you lose an entire army. that's one of gallagher's arguments. the stuff doesn't actually work because -- mr. conners. >> i will say i think definitely something to do with the opposing generals. >> explain. >> he has a really good read on people like mcclellan or bernside. he has this problem where he will freeze up when he is given too much and burn a bridge and takes him along time to get across that bridge and bernside can be taken advantage of and exploited as mcclellan obviously and will break if pushed right and he doesn't get that good of read when it comes to grant. >> yes. also what should be added is a good read on the army of pa tomorrow ak. the army patomac fights hard and rank and foul are effective, but its generals and kind of an organizational problem and partly because of mcclellan and a lot of the officers he selected and the culture he creates is a very defensive passive minded one and it is also it is like the team, the sports team that gets beaten by the same team too often, and there seems to be a sense they get the culture of losers, and what is the opposite thing in