wedd still anher element, analong with it, an rely new set of parameters r an employer to accept, understad comply with; in ca owaltan huen whiey. [narrato >> vanuen d why had been friends and business associates for a number of years. whenever they got together, the conversation would sooner or later turn to the subject of business. they'd brainstorm ideas, trying to decide what kind of new business venture the world needed. but things never really went any further than just talk. finally, one day, they decided to get serious and go into their own business. it seemed like the perfect partnership. van huesen and whitney got along famously, and they were also the perfect blend of talents. >> i'm an engineer by training, so i've always been pretty organized and systematic about things. i like to think of myself as a creative problem solver, working with customers to come up with just the right combination of products to satisfy their needs. >> the only real technical background i have is what i picked up in the field, handling equipment repair projects, and managing work groups. my strong su

in his ne understaed entence, anny ickinson caured the upheava that the fal of richmond mean, cause millwas gonand slery was oneand things woulnever be te sameand everyonead bla and whte, hado beg workin ot fferent rations. anotr realyfasinatg character s thoas chesr. he was n afrian-american jourlist, the ony lack journalisfor mjor northern per to b with the rthern armies omi into thecit. inact the wer a umer ofjounalists four ajo pars in the orth who ame into theity the ay of he firend the next ouple days aftwards andthe st wonderful cablesbac to wonderfuland sensiti, etailed dispates back o teir papers ad because of the teleaph,the dy - on, mae at themos twodays ter, peoplin the nrth readhese vry deaile accountsf what as happeng in ricmond. so the was grea informion for mes a writer ecau during ths twilit week, ou woul ha these eportsthat had a bu lne and a datline," eveno the our, soyo knewhat theyknew at tat partular date d you alo ew what tey din't know ich iswhat was oing n with t militarsituaon. it's grea infortion. omaschter wrte his firstispatch o hs pper thphiladelph press, seate

if i understand your testimony earlier, you are planning on the first 487, but is it my understa understanding -- am i understanding that you've not made plans for the sequestration? >> that's correct. >> and in all fairness, mr. secretary, that's just as much the law right now as the first $487 billion, isn't it? >> it's the law, but it doesn't take effect until january of 2013. >> which is nine months from now? >> january 2013. >> what am i supposed to tell my folks back home that the secretary of defense isn't making plans for a half a billion dollars in cuts that take place in nine months? >> yeah, because i think it's totally irresponsible for the congress to allow a sequester to take place that will weaken our defense system and devastate it with these across the board cuts. >> you're preaching to the choir. i voted against it for that reason. it's just as much a part of the law as what you are planning for. >> but it's -- it's a law that frankly doesn't require a hell of a lot of planning because it's so blind minded in the way it approaches it. it basically makes it -- it provides a fo

reflected earlie beg gone so farat every syrian, including the syrian governmen people should understaown people. this is wand, the emergency lawe y.? there's a tdg democracy, strengtituon. but they're sayinhe th wor in eventually engaged inamps in this is as human planill b a good examp which is based maiy speaking on this is air are syrians. variety of religions and a estion to be examined in that way. they reallydo people inside so the nato, and they're not welcome to comewardh this year. we're ssyria? >> i don't think so. we have a lot of corruption and w. we would like toge sneaked in because they couldn't corruption. >> rose: hasn't it go wings of the external opposition. but thisno in the ere and they need freean, said the same governmenwhhoms where s and when that saudi rials somebody was givingunderstandes wr arity in our area. the beinit's a painful situatior because as countries such esumes... it therong charlie. government in syria.ng or helping the syrians to reform people, the syrian people that , the agenda of these people outside syria in homstherova they were workil of

you almost have really a structural conflict between the do i understa kind of conservative justices,nd they're facing, at least for a time, in the liberal branchs. >> i think the truth is the president is anticipating a political deceit on his major piece of groundwork. they're going to be the bad guy in this kind of tactic for the fall campaign. that's the concern people are talking about. >> i think there is battle lines drawn around the supreme court. it's going to be a general election issue for both sides. for the first time people are going to take the power of the president to supreme court justice seriously beyond abortion. >> that might be a good thing, people realizing how important this court is. >> president obama's comments were nothing compared to threats of the past like fdr trying to pass the cork. >> cork packing. >> that's a serious judicial brush-back speech with serious constitutional complications. >> thank you, all three of you. appreciate it. >>> there's been a surprising sentence for some shocking crimes involving terrorism. late today, a federal judge gave th

augusta, agreeing that women should be admitted, i think it's time for the people of augusta will understa understand. traditionally given membership, invited to membership in the augusta golf club, that person happens to be a female right now, and she has not been invited to join augusta. if i were she, i would look at that in leadership. >> they say they've just not had a female. that begs the question, who exactly are you waiting for? what does it work out. >> those guys just need to wake up and wake up fast. >> in fact, by now maybe a decade ago, and the culmination would be, isn't this a fight we've had? >> i don't know if we settled it. thank you, susan page, thank you, howard feinman as always. >>> coming up, the democratic party is inundated by tea partie partiers. this is "hardball." helping generations through tough times. good times. never taking a bailout. there when you need them. helping millions of americans over the centuries. the strength of a global financial leader. the heart of a one-to-one relationship. together for your future. ♪ and i thought "i can't do this, it's j

i think there are a lot of people who don't listen to science and don't understa it. so they... they're going to be difficult to... to sway with the scientifical... scientific arguments. >> i don't give a [ no audio ] about what the mmr said. my kid got six vaccines in one day and he regressed. you don't have any science that can show me that the regression wasn't triggered by the six vaccines. what the parents are saying is, "i went in for a vaccine appointment. my kid got six vaccines and they regressed." we need to ask the question as to why the regression took place. not whether the regression took place, why the regression took place. the only way to do that is to look at that load of vaccines and compare a group of kids or a group of animals who got the load and who didn't. >> if you're going to do epidemiology, let's ask the right question. let's not confine it to mmr, and let's not confine it to one component in the vaccine, mercury. you have to do bench science. you have to look at the human body and what occurs in terms of changes in immune function, brain f