or e.g. that we adopted, working draft maps through april 11th, we continued the process of reviewing, revising and publishing the working draft map through april 11, and the task force, i know this hasn't taken place yet, but anticipating the task force will adopt its final map today, april 14. >> may i make one suggestion at that point? it's just that the task course included language reflecting its final vote. >> yes. continue? >> yes, please. >> next section four, final map and plan, this is where we incorporated all of the individual members lists of the neighborhoods or communities that were discussed in all of our meetings and i believe there are still -- i'm not sure that every list here incorporates a submission from each of us, but i'm not -- i wasn't aware of who was still outstanding or disruptions for which district were still outstanding. that might be something -- >> let's pause on that question. so who has not submitted their district? >> i september my twice. >> so district o

do because the army having directed scientists had been able to give great invention to the world, e.g., the nuclear bomb and this contribution had been made in three short years where as prima donna scientists working on their own would have taken half a century to make that sort of progress. i think the problem at the tail end of it science becomes politicized and you basically have scientists that have to fight each other to get the government money. i think that just like the idea of a philosopher king is a bit of an oxymoron and philosophers are very different from kings and i think the idea of a scientist politician is an oxymoron. they're fundamentally different from great politicians. when you plit size science you destroy it altogether. we have 100 times as many scientists as we did in 1920. if there is less rapid progress than in 1920 the productivity per scientist is perhaps less than 1% of what it was in 1920. i think that's the rough math. i believe that it would be helpful to have a very comprehensive discussion as to how we get out of this sort of situation we find ourse

of the san mateo bridge, and of problems over e.g. there. live look at the golden geishas traffic flowing freely out of marin county. a lot of green on the road with sensors with no accidents to report. >>james: the family of junior seau said it will further consider donating his brain for research career >> we are honoring a legend. >> he will never be forgotten. his number will stay in everyone's hearts. >> around the country, fans like this to time to remember and reflect on all the good things and then he left behind. >> he was a good inspiration for everyone in san diego. the pastor said the family is planning an intimate, a private service for the family. >> heat was remarkable. he was unselfish. suggesting >> next month the u.s. open comes to san francisco. vern glenn introduces us to local hopeful. >> john berkeley spend half of his 54 years on a golf course as a caddy. the last three were at the olympic club. it is no wonder he would like to sleep between the ropes as a player in the u.s. open. who would know this course better than

i wrote a draft of the book and then i wonder, e.g.can read this book and think for monopolist, today? i added a line and say most obvious there's a reason for monopoly now. but apparently some people skipped over that line. no, it's not an argument, although it is a matter of pasting personally for me sitting with the contradiction the mess we've come to understand that the anopheles are not good for consumers. given a choice, can increase the cost of technology come a slow the rate of innovation. at this point in time during this. the united states but telecommunications was developed, monopoly i think arguably was very good in the country that accreted bell labs and the like to think long-term on these very vexing problems. >> part of the reason i asked the question is part of what comes through in the book is the sense that people had freedom, time, they had teams to work together. there wasn't necessarily the sense that we have to get this done tomorrow. that came in a sense because they had a captured market, right? they didn't h

e.g. 20 will soon catch up with his big what he says about nato is right.we need is refused by all nato countries to go through their budgets, to work out what is actually necessary for national defense, but what more we can all do to make sure nato has capacity for the future. >> our national spirit and the need neatest demo and the technology of tomorrow. on the issue of cyber terrorism, which is posing an ever greater threat and can the prime minister assure us that there will be the intense focus and resources giving in nato to that very, very big and growing problem across the world? >> icann certain essay for the uk's part one of the things we did in the strategic defense review was some of the savings we may, i remember, i think 900 million pounds into a cyber defense program. that has been corny with others but also involving the private sector but it's a capability we hope to work with other nato members to make sure we are sharing best expect annett davis but that should lead to savings for us and to others. >> mr. peter bone. >> mr. speaker, mont

i wrote a draft of the book and then i wonder, e.g.can read this book and think for monopolist, today? i added a line and say most obvious there's a reason for monopoly now. but apparently some people skipped over that line. no, it's not an argument, although it is a matter of pasting personally for me sitting with the contradiction the mess we've come to understand that the anopheles are not good for consumers. given a choice, can increase the cost of technology come a slow the rate of innovation. at this point in time during this. the united states but telecommunications was developed, monopoly i think arguably was very good in the country that accreted bell labs and the like to think long-term on these very vexing problems. >> part of the reason i asked the question is part of what comes through in the book is the sense that people had freedom, time, they had teams to work together. there wasn't necessarily the sense that we have to get this done tomorrow. that came in a sense because they had a captured market, right? they didn't h

you have to pull on e.g. in your disposal to do it. author anna quindlen talk about her perspectives on guide to special policy. live on sunday in in-depth. her latest rem nation on life is lots of cattles, plenty of cake. starting at noon eastern on c-span2. on sunday. early crier this spring federal reserve chairman returned to the former profession as a teacher. the four classes at george washington university. his particular class focused on what lead up to the 2008 financial collapse with him didn't contribute to the housing bubble. this is an hour and twenty minutes. [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible conversations]. >> let's get started i'll like to welcome the students back for the second lecture. as well as the faculty. i know, we have new guests and friends that are here today. you in for the treat. if it was anything like it was tuesday, it will be another great session. chairman bernanke. [applause] thank you very much. you came back! [laughter] that's good news. as you know, today is the second of four lectures on the fina

and say why should we trust you on intellectual property rights, copyright in a vision and the like, e.g. treat, so maltreat your own people? chen is a hero. is commission will stay focused on him, and we will not rest until he and his family, and great friends, our free. this hearing is adjourned. [inaudible conversations] >> [inaudible conversations] >> and just an update on this story from china, secretary clinton has commented on the case. the state department has released the following statement from victoria newman sang the chinese government stated today that mr. chen guangcheng has the same right to travel abroad as any other citizen of china. mr. chen has been offered a fellowship from an american university what he can be accompanied by his wife and two children. the statement goes on, the chinese government has indicated it will accept mr. chen's application for appropriate travel documents. that statement from the state department this morning. "the new york times" writing from beijing reporting that in her first public comments on the dissident since arriving in china, secre

e.g. 20 will soon catch up with his big what he says about nato is riht.s refused by all nato countries to go through their budgets, to work out what is actually necessary for national defense, but what more we can all do to make sure na has capacity for the future. >> our national spirit and the need neatest demo and the technology of tomorrow. on the issue of cyber terrorism, which is posing an ever greater threat and can the prime minister assure us that there will be the intense focu and resources giving in nato to that very, very big and growing problem across the world? >> icann certain essay for the uk's part one of the things we did in the strategic defense review was some of the savings we may, i remember, i think 900 million pounds into a cyber defense program. that has been corny with others but also involving the private sector but it's a capability we hope to work with other to members to make sure we are sharing best expect annett davis but that should lead to savings for us and to others. >> mr. peter bone. >> mr. speaker, monti python's par