1994, just for history's sake, mayor feinstein urged the redevelopment agency to reject a similar kondo plan. to crowd a condominium tower would be regrettable, is what the mayor said. he pointed out the existing golden gateway was chosen because "the provision of open space was a factor in that selection." this is the open space we will be getting rid of. my district has the least amount of open space in the city. one-third of the residents are seniors. most are middle class. this is contrary to what you have heard during the course of this discussion. we have a choice between 90,000 square feet of outdoor recreation space compared to 20,000 square feet of open space promised by the developer when the city gives the developer $5 million. we are destroying community and i am not sure for what reason. i'm going to quickly touch upon the technical reasons that we should reject this eir. the plan kept changing. it was not stable. the public needs to understand what we are voting on. you cannot say the tennis courts and common period and then take away the tennis courts. the fact the real a

atomic energy commission head shunsuke kondo was among those who attended the first four of the closed door sessions. critics are demanding members of the government advisory panel explain what was discussed at the meetings with industry representatives. >>> the fukushima daiichi nuclear disaster fueled worldwide doubts over the merits of nuclear power. in japan, political leaders are debating whether or not to restart nuclear plants. at present, the country's electricity supply is for the first time in 42 years nuclear free. another dilemma japan faces is whether to abandon the decades long objective of establishing a self-sustaining nuclear fuel cycle. in today's nuclear watch, we take a closer look at what has been a pillar of japan's nuclear policy. given its limited natural resources, japan decided in 1956 on a policy to reprocess spent nuclear fuel and use the plutonium extracted in that way. the plutonium was to fuel fast breeder reactors, which theoretically produce more plutonium than they consume. but plans to put fast breeder reactors into use have been stalled since an acci

atomic energy commission head shunsuke kondo was among those who attended first four of the closed door sessions. kritdices are demanding members of the government advisory panel explain what was discussed at the meetings with industry representatives. >>> the fukushima daiichi nuclear disaster fuld worldwide doubts over the merits of nuclear power. in japan, political leaders are debating whether or not to restart nuclear plants. at present, the country's electricity supply is for the first time in 42 years nuclear free. another dilemma japan faces is whether to abandon the decades long objective of establishing a self-sustaining nuclear fuel cycle. in today's nuclear watch, we take a closer look at what has been a pillar of japan's nuclear policy. given its limited natural resources, japan decided in 1956 on a policy to reprocess spent nuclear fuel and use the plutonium extracted in that way. the plutonium was to fuel fast breeder reactors, which theoretically produce more plutonium than they consume. but plans to put fast breeder reactors into use have been stalled since an accident