. >> nart senator, i will assure you, i will look at that report. and i wrote down you have a feeling they arrived with a prec preconceived notion. and so we will attack the report in that way and i clearly understand what you're talking about about real savings over the long hundred and other unintended consequences. the team should be focused on those and we'll ask those questions. >> great. again, i recognize the need. and as you know through our markup we did last year, i offered needs and savings and we tried to save the army a lot of money on miads and somehow got jacked back in and not by you guys but the house taken it back out so we're trying to save a few hundred million there. we're game to find the savings, but let's make sure they're sustainable savings. that's how we look at this. again, i have a series of other pieces, but you get the sense. the nepa analysis, when you build housing and all of these other things, it is all a cost that has to be figured into this. i appreciate that. let me end on one last comment, question, and that's