mr. kwok and his wife live on the eastern side. the beams that we were trying to address for the dry rot repair have always extended all the way to the edge of the home. and that is shown in exhibit b. the other approval of want to make is we live in close quarters and i respectful of the fact that some neighbors, including mr. kwok and his wife will be sensitive to privacy issues. i have that history of aiding -- living eight years next to mr. kwok. i have had several complaints from him over the years at the ranch from light coming out of my office in a way that is unacceptable to him and so i have tried to probably to a fall avoid conflict by putting at his request shades of to block the light from coming out of that window which also means that i get in from the daytime from that window and i have done that and he has asked, mentioned the fence between our yards has rotted and wanted me to repair it saar repaired the fans we share between our lots without asking him to contribute to that cost. he has asked me on multiple occasi

mr. kwok's. the inner side of that wall -- was their interest to put the wall all the way around between the other rails? >> no. >> your intent is to build a deck that is 2 feet 6 inches wide? >> whatever is allowed by planning. it has been allowed if it is a 3 ft. balcony. that is what is in the appellate's last exhibit. you can see the description. extending 3 feet out from the rear wall. a balcony with firewall in exhibit o of the appellant's brief. not 2 feet 6 inches but 3 feet. >> may i hear -- why are we hearing the discrepancies hear? >> my sense that the appellant -- the permit holder may be confusing the building department with the planning department. which is an understanding -- understandable confusion, i might add. if i can perhaps throw something out there. the photo on the overhead right now -- is not clear to me if this is the condition of the de t