>> in our initial findings, it would nedda's 3000 net new jobs -- net loss 3000 net new jobs. obviously, we're going to reduce that benefit a little bit. we are expecting a under the mayor's proposal -- and it is probably lower under supervisor avalos's. >> i think it is vitally important that both camps find a single place to land before the legislation goes before the voters. the last thing we want is two ballot measures. i hope there is a lot of working to narrow the gap so we have a single piece of legislation and if there is anything we can do to help with that process, i think we would all be happy to do it. it will be very difficult to support these two things going forward independently. there is a tremendous amount of work that has to go back to all the financial calculations. the sooner we get there, the sooner we can do legislation to fix the situation. and it seems that we have the political will to do it, and so, let's not get hung up on the details and find a place we can both agree on so we can move forward. president adams: any other commissioners? i agree with