we put this under the rubric we call project readiness, looking at environmental clearance and making sure it is a solid project moving forward. again, you will see money flowing to the projects in 14-15 through 15-16. how will projects be selected? we have a criteria on page 63 of your packet. a lot of the guidelines, screening and priorities are dictated by the federal level. we have to follow the guidelines. a specific example is if a project wants funds it has to be a certain condition below 70. i won't get into the technicalities. certain things we have to make sure they are meeting benchmarks. mtc included criteria focused on priority projects on the growth. these will come down from mtc following san francisco specific criteria. if you look at what is in your packet, where we have italics, this is the project criteria. readiness is something we will be working on with project sponsors. we will be given priority to project streets. one of the advantages of having the different fund program under one rubric as it is much easier to fund projects that address multiple modes and mul

under this rubric the city developed a strategy that looks at streets not only in isolation but understoodthey function as network and collection serving similar travel demands need to be developed as multimodal corridors with some streets playing important roles for surface-running transit; others playing a key role for the dwpment of the bicycle network such as that as we afford with street level we are thinking wholelysing tickly about how the network functions. all this is detailed in the report. i will touch a couple

under this rubric the city developed a strategy that looks at streets not only in isolation but understood they function as network and collection serving similar travel demands need to be developed as multimodal corridors with some streets playing important roles for surface-running transit; others playing a key role for the dwpment of the bicycle network such as that as we afford with street level we are thinking wholelysing tickly about how the network functions. all this is detailed in the report. i will touch a couple highlights. we recognize all our surface streets need to be safe and accessible for pedestrians. that some streets are going to serve and do serve a role for vehicular traffic but improvements need to focus on vulnerable users, particularly pedestrians. we are thinking about how the network as a whole functions. in terms how this boils down to the street level, some highlights. these are detailed in executive summary. on east-west streets, thinking about how do we develop corridors through the neighborhood and around the neighborhood that support community livability but

by implication own a community college election would fit in that rubric, to support college advancement to people who have traditionally been put at the margins of our society. in those two elections, i think, are the most fundamental in the sense that they go to the root of advancement in this country and the obtaining of the american dream. so the school board and community college board i would certainly support that. >> thank you, miss olague. >> i don't think there is much to add to that. i know a couple of years ago there was a ballot measure that failed. so i would totally support bringing this back and allowing people to reconsider it. because as mr. everett said, i think it is important for people, especially those who have children in the school district and also students at the city college level to be able to weigh in on those types of questions. and i would be open to considering other elections as well. but i think as mr. everett mentioned, at a minimum, i would consider supporting and allowing non-citizens to vote in either of those two. >> here i am different. i have two

the rise of the tea party, the evangelicals who have organized their political dissent under the rubricf a religious coordinated and a firm belief that release of birds potential for grasping hold of the very progressive policies we would speak on. you're acting as if his existing outside the confines of that intransigence and resistance to him and the varied and i'll to himself as a human being, much less the president of the united states of america out of a certain level of dignity and respect. so in that context, all of which -- much of what you're talking about i agree with. and your point is, since i agree with it, and complicit in the very evil eye 0.2. i am a baptist preacher. i ain't got no kind of idealist notions that people who argue about justice don't have blood on their hands as well, including the black left and the american left that sits around and engages in rhetorical revolutionary analysis without getting inside the game that people have to play. this is what i mean by the sports analogy. if you come to any poor spot in american culture where people are being depriv

. >> suarez: what should we describe as being under the rub rick of hazing-- rubric of hazing, goingus party in a diaper, being covered in chocolate sauce seems fairly benign but at the other end of the continuum there is physical abuse that borders on t fatal. >> right. well, i define it as a process based on a decision used by groups to maintain a hierarchy or discipline. and regardless of consent, any of the kinds of activities that are psychologically or physically harmful are hazing. as you said it goes from mild to severe but it can end up in death as it did in this case. >> suarez: so dean, does trying to top this force it underground, out of site, make it harder to police? >> it is very difficult. >> i think it's the way awe approach the subject. if you are to real affect change which is the challenge that we have here while keeping all that we know to be good about some of these processes or some of the organizations and memberships, certainly, without, without throwing out the baby with the bathwater, we need to do more than just police it, do more than just enforce it. we

and it comes under the rubric of careful what you pray for.'m not talking about tomorrow's jobs report. although i'm sure there are a bunch of political strategists trying to think through what they're going to say tomorrow morning when the jobs report is not stellar. no, i'm thinking about it from the point of view of the democrats narrative that republicans have become so extreme. i've been shocked, actually, the last two nights. we had audiences here booing when god was being put back into the party platform. we have people who are clearly anti-free trade, something that president clinton was always very pro. this is a party that has become not just pro-choice, which i respect, but pro-abortion. any abortion any time any time anywhere for any reason at taxpayer funding. sandra fluk, a very wonderful and smart young woman, she's talking about not just insurance programs covering contraception, i can support that, she's arguing for contraception that's free for every woman. that is at taxpayer funding. i think this is a party that has become

defenders of the coverage formula, that is the formula that says, only the southern states are under this rubric, to defend that when it seems that ohio and pennsylvania have the same sort of voting problems that texas or south carolina does. the court has a couple pending forces coming their way on that. in the journal du, they will hear one of those cases and i would think -- i think the general view, there will hear one of those cases, and i would think that -- the other big case we are confident there will take as the gay rights and defensive marriage act. this is not a question of whether gays can marry in states. the question is coming in states where gay marriage is legal, do those married gay couples have a right to equal benefits under federal law? the first circuit court up in new england acting on a suit by several gay couples in massachusetts, there were legally married in mass., but cannot file a joint federal tax return. or if one woman works the political service and her spouse is at home, can she be on the health care plan? this is a question of equal treatment group legally marr

defenders of the coverage formula, that is the formula that says, only the southern states are under this rubric, to defend that when it seems that ohio and pennsylvania have the same sort of voting problems that texas or south carolina does. the court has a couple pending forces coming their way on that. in the journal du, they will hear one of those cases and i would think -- i think the general view, there will hear one of those cases, and i would think that -- the other big case we are confident there will take as the gay rights and defensive marriage act. this is not a question of whether gays can marry in states. the question is coming in states where gay marriage is legal, do those married gay couples have a right to equal benefits under federal law? the first circuit court up in new england acting on a suit by several gay couples in massachusetts, there were legally married in mass., but cannot file a joint federal tax return. or if one woman works the political service and her spouse is at home, can she be on the health care plan? this is a question of equal treatment group legally marr

let's pause for the fact we have to live awhile under the rubric of unlimited corporate spending, unlimitedlionaire spending, on ads. what's the value of that being done secretly? what is the balance in terms of harm to the public on not having information of who is, in fact, behind the spending. johnstone first. >> disclosure is almost everything in the laws, and it puzzles me why -- >> presumed in citizens united, but not actually there. >> proponents of voter id laws spend vast conspiracy theories what's going on in secret to talk about a few hundred votes that might be fraudulent and don't focus on the problem you're talking about, the money not spent because it doesn't have to be spent. the polarization and factualization of the politics and inability to solve national problems is a great greater problem than a couple of close state or local elections going the wrong way because they are tied. the problem when the court steps in to change the law is it can't predict the consequences and so when justice kennedy said we live in an era of disclosure, he forget what was talked about. we kn

will be hard for those defenders for the four men of the says only the southern states are under the rubricems ohio and pennsylvania have the same voting problems as taxes -- texas ourself carolina. i think the view is they will hear one of the cases with the better than average chance section v will be limited restrict down. and also confident they will take the gay-rights and very jacked. whether nine days can vary where it is legal where they have a right to equal benefit under federal law. the first circuit court in the mingle and brought by several gay couples legally married but cannot file a joint tax return. if one works for the postal service can a spouse be on the health care plan? mrs. equal treatment i think the court will take the case in this likely that it did not raise the illegally married gay couple to equal protection. that they have a right to marry will be in mississippi your nebraska but although they never said what is the standard of review with discrimination? they have never quite said. with the defense of marriage act that they decided later on. i will stop prepar

but it is a very complicated rubric and they think it's very easy to talk about how things might be different, but the bottom line is the legislature has been the last method was pushed through by senator shield than others. it focuses on the right wing that we will look forward to working with them if there's necessary small changes to be made. but the basic formula about making sure we get an equitable distribution of the dollars to send and part of the missouri law for many, many decades and will continue to work to make it as efficient, affect given fair as possible. >> date spans. >> is a slippery slope because the matter were you going in the come, some people feel like they don't get enough. the ones who do want to hold onto it. i problem solver, not a politician. i'm willing to open it up and look at it. i surround myself with people on bias and see if it's truly fair. also in our state we have a funding problem. it's called lack of taxpayers. money is not always the answer to a republican education. can they treat their business model? absolutely, i would encourage them. precious com

defenders of the coverage formula, that is the formula that says only the southern states are under this rubricto defend that when it seems that ohio and pennsylvania have the same sort of voting problems that texas or south carolina does. the court has a couple of pending cases coming their way on that. i think the general view is a wizard to hear one of those cases and i would think there's a better than average case that it will be better than limited or struck down or something to say it is outdated. the other big case that we are pretty confident they will take is the gay rice and the defense of marriage act. this is not a question of whether gay can marry in the states. the question isn't states were gay marriages legal to those married gay couples have a right to equal benefits under federal law. the first circuit court in new england acting on a soup to die several gay couples in massachusetts. they were legally married in massachusetts, yet they can't file a joint tax return. or if one woman works for the postal service and her spouses at home, can she be on that health care plan? this

but it is a very complicated rubric and i think, you know, it's very easy to talk about how things maydifferent, but the bottom line is legislature has at various times this last method was pushed through by senator shields and others. it focuses on the bright think that will work out looking if there's necessary small changes to be made. the basic formula about making sure we couldn't equitable distribution of dollars is something that's been part of this for many, many decades and will continue to work to make it as efficient, effective and despair as possible. >> dave spence. >> it's a slippery slope because the matter were you going to stay, people feel that they don't get enough. the ones that get it want to hang onto it. i'm a problem solver, not a politician. if people feel like it's a problem, i went to open it up and look at it and surround myself with people that are unbiased and look at it and see if it's truly fair. but also in our state we have a funding problem. it's called lack of taxpayers. money is not always the answer to a republican education. can they treat their b

defenders of the coverage formula, that is the formula that says only the southern states are under this rubric to defend that when it seems that ohio and pennsylvania have the same sort of voting problems that texas or south carolina does. they have a couple of pending cases coming away on that. i did the general view is they are certainly going to hear one of those cases, and i would think that as a better than average chance that section five is going to be limited or struck down or something to say that it's outdated. the other big case that we are pretty confident you're going to take is the gay-rights and the defense of marriage act. if this is not a question of whether gays can marry in states, the question is in states where gay marriage is legal to those married gay couples have a right to equal benefits under federal law. the first circuit court in new england acting on a suit brought by several couples in massachusetts, they were leglly married in massachusetts, but yet they can't finally joint federal tax return. or if one woman works for the postal service and her spouse is at home

but it is a very complicated rubric and i think that it is very easy to talk about how things might be different but the bottom line is the legislature has sometimes in the last month said pushed through bye senator shields and others and it focuses on the right things and we will look forward to working with them if they're necessary small changes to be made. but the basic formula making sure that we get an equitable distribution to the dollars is something that has been pardoned for many, many decades and will continue to work ticket to become a kid as effective and as fair as possible. >> moderator: dave spence spence: it is a slippery slope because no matter where you go in the state some people feel like they don't get enough and the ones that are getting it want to hang onto it. i'm going to look at it. i'm a problem solver. we have a lot of problems in our state if people feel like it is a problem i am willing to open it up and look at and surround myself with people that are unbiased and look at it and see if it should be fair. but also in our state we have a funding problem th