without those i said the products were too uneconomic to buy.ssed the antidumping tariffs anticommerce dumped on chinese solar imports. even as it was a major 31% tariff that made it so first solar was more competitive. plus i dismissed the importance of green energy to germany and orders kept coming through even as total allocation for solar power got cut back. then they got a slew of orders and the stock doubles. i was stock about the stock being a value trap. most important, i had a huge home run telling you to get out at 138. why did i press it? greedy on the short side as a stupid buyer is on the long side. with first solar i arrogantly failed to practice my mantra, that bulls make money, bears make money, and hogs get slaughtered. i was no longer just being a bear on first solar, i was being a hog. i blew it. when it was at 13 i should have bren changing my mind instead of digging in my heels. the stock is down more than 100 points from where i first told you to sell it, it's never too late to declare a victory, as well as atone myself whe

without those subsidies, i would say those products were too uneconomic to buy.issed the tariffs the chinese solar import. even as it was a major 31% tariff that made it so first solar was more competitive. plus i dismissed the importance of green energy to germany no matter what in a tight pinch of budget. and orders kept coming through even as the total allocation got cut back. next thing you know the company is winning a slew of domestic orders, and the stock, it doubles. yep, i was wrong about the stock being a value trap, but i underestimated the positive impact on the tariffs on first solar's business, but most important, i had a huge home run telling you to get out at $138. why didn't i declare victory when it fell to 1/10 of that level? why be as greedy on the short side as a stupid buyer is on the long side. i arrogantly failed to practice my mantra. my mantra is that bulls make money, bears make money, and hogs, they get slaughtered. i was no longer just being a bear on first solar, i was being a hog. and i blew it. first solar was it $13, i should have

another cruiser was heavily damaged and you can say the american at shoe is the first exhibit uneconomic the japanese. we can do this. this is the way forward. admiral scott had a real feather in his cap. so now we go back to having navy learns lesson in how it does its business and what does it now do with the victory it has under his belt. naturally you think admiral scott would be come the send command and stronger taskforces with operation, but as they move through october, we find changes that the line from his near -- i'm sorry, a plane from his bubble have a very powerful impact on how the campaign develops. so the change of command at the highest level because well, the commander at the south pacific mode vice admiral robert wormley for a number of reasons have been rodman to lead the charge the south's essay, having been stationed at london he's a special naval observer in the blitz was going on in reporting directly to president roosevelt. he was the natural choice to serve as commander, but as the campaign began unfolding, it really became fair that he wasn't the kind of leade

the reason were 5010 jobs in 48 uneconomic development. jane nixon is not within the same world. we are in the world with hurt and despair. you see people putting $5 of gas in their tank because that's all they have. people wake up tomorrow hoping it's no worse than today and is going to the good life. it's okay for him. he's been on the payroll for 26 years. he is penchant for the rest of the site that we're going to pay. i'm sorry, the real world is about results and the results is where we find ourselves. in the real world, the ceo would be fired. >> was moved her next question then. this comes from miller and goes first first two days spent. >> colombia and other communities struggling to close the achievement gap among school children of different races. statewide data shows clear racial disparities in many socioeconomic indicators such as employment, education, homeownership and business ownership. what do you make of that? and as governor, what would you do to address it? >> i think it's all about jobs. we need more people getting taxpayers a number of people living off th