promised information should impact your decision because i believe you would not vote to condone uninspected, unsafe work in a park. you would not vote to allow two serious problems, at least that i learned from these documents, first that edward or teddy forsure the named resident engineer on some of the inspections is not an engineer but a student. secondly that no one, not even today knows the scope of work under this permit. rec and park admits this in their brief here when it states the tennis courts part of this permit will be part of a different permit related to the harbor trellis. new information included in the six tenant approved plans for that permit. that permit was issued after the hearing and i later received the approved plans. this is now one of at least five permits, building permits for this project, not counting plumbing or anything like that. in the hearing we had previously scott sanchez testified on behalf of the zoning department that the paths at the summit would be retained and that they were not ada accessible. the new permit plans for the 610 show the scope of wor