>> nancy, this guy reminds me of jeffrey dahmer. with jeffrey dahmer, it was not enough to kill.y dahmer wanted to incinerate, burn, destroy, melt body parts. remember, jeffrey dahmer bore -- would drill holes in his victims' skulls. he would put torsos in plastic buckets full of chemicals. so that the torsos would melt. he gathered the body parts so that he could have control over them and for his sexual satisfaction. so with this guy, i think you are seeing not just a pattern of homicide, but almost either cannibalism, a fetishizing of body parts, a perverse wish to have control over the body. and there may be more parts in that house. >> interesting that he is hoarding body parts. to the lawyers. sherman, brimner. mickey, another question is this. let me see mickey, please. mickey, i have seen offenders confess to a murder, but they will not confess to molesting a child. i mean the best we can pray for here, mickey, is that he knocked her out with some type of you know, knockout gas on a rag like he tried to do to the jogger. how can you explain all of jessica's little clothes

. >> bill: like jeffrey dahmer. how long did he last?minute >> it's the most represencib crime. >> bill: they'll kill him if they see him isl og th il a w ld is is bizarre. the supreme court is hearing a case and you have to make it simple so i can understand it. hearing a case that if they rule one way, would say to us, we the people, heyyo c s y ts t.e ose called -- it existed since 9:08 when it was recognized. there is a splitmong the circuit courts, the second, third, and the 9th. a lot of disparity in theaw. bottom line, supreme court is wiulorlyt yer it aef le sl yhili onecic ipad, cars if they're foreign made would be subjected to this. >> bill: wt is the rationale w tec cit gesae it wrong but the rationale is copyright law. once you buy that thing from the foreign maker, that you owe the foreign maker, if y try to resell it to somebody else. >> bill: why? he's sling the product to me. loo m b. she btohe pc d he ic buys the book and wants to resell, i can't op him. >> but the difference is the 1908 doctrine doesn't apply necessari

. >> bill: like jeffrey dahmer. how long did he last?minutes. >> it's the most represencible crime. >> bill: they'll kill him if they see him. this guy will be rotting in the chill and well he should. this is bizarre. the supreme court is hearing a case and you have to make it simple so i can understand it. hearing a case that if they rule one way, would say to us, we the people, hey, you can't sell your own stuff if it's made overseas. >> that's right. called -- it existed since 9:08 when it was recognized. there is a split among the circuit courts, the second, third, and the 9th. a lot of disparity in the law. bottom line, supreme court is going to hear it and hopefully will rule correctly that you're able to sell your things like personal electronic, ipad, cars if they're foreign made would be subjected to this. >> bill: what is the rationale for any judge to say to me i can't sell my stuff? >> well, the second circuit got it wrong but the rationale is copyright law. once you buy that thing from the foreign maker, that you owe the for