if malthus, quote, proposes to introduce a system of celibacy, tayler asked, who could fail to notice the difference in point of benevolence between indirect slavery to an absolute master and direct slavery to an absolute master. in a tayler's america even though subjected to, quote connecticut slavery to its absolute master retains the right to reproduce. in his america than a matter of the other freedoms of were denied to enslaved people including the right to legal marriage and indeed to yonah their own children they didn't have the right to reproduce in danger of malthus's england. the slave holders that could boast that african-americans and of bondage had a greater basic civil liberties and privileges than freeborn englishmen in his bringing. meanwhile white americans enjoyed natural rights to love and marriage that were impossible to imagine in the cramped english island. print was the key arena where these ideas were spread where public and private intercepted and where personal behavior could be glossed with political meaning. malthus had wide exposure in american popular cul

there were demonstrations already scheduled in tayler on. one of the demonstrations was from east to west, right in front of the embassy. one of the group's preplanned as we know stopped and shouted slogans. >> students, soldiers? >> students. these were mostly as i noticed engineering students, people from the university of the engineering school and the public technique and the area of the demonstration came over the wall. we were essentially defenseless there was a government in iran which had no power to defend  ere were some people at the embassy in police uniforms wh disappeared since the attack me. because of course it is the irony in government as it would be true in any country where th host government is responsible for the security of a foreign mission. >> so, professor, the marine guards? >> there were marine guards. >> were they allowed to fire? >> no, fortunately. there was probably one of the best decisions they take. to this day i feel i owe

booktv troubled just outside to hear from colby college professor and local author lotus the tayler. she talks about her book the virgin warrior the life-and-death of joan of arc. >> i wasn't very interested in the beginning at all. she was too much of an anomaly that went off to fight in the 100 year war and then i saw some films in 1999 some bad ones and so good ones that made me think she could be more interesting than i thought. so i realize looking in the library that were more sources about joan of arc than almost any figure in putting kings and queens. it's a typical portrayal of her is someone who is just a force of god or a force of the st and when i started reading the documents, because we ought not only have her own voice in the trial but we of the villagers that she fought with that testify to 25 years after her death about her and these were not only for us is that were completely silent in the historical average, and talked about her and for example the villagers in particular would say things like she didn't want to dance with us. we made fun of her lot. and that stru

senator tayler, you mentioned that i've called for a new spending increase. i believe that has been misleading people. you are a state legislature and you know that when you ask for the accountants to show you what a budget would look like if it was held even, that is not the same thing saying that i want new spending increases. the way the budget process works, agencies and ask for any budget increase that they want. and the governor then considers what that will be. we give the agency directors an opportunity to recommend what will happen in the future to their spending needs and we will respond to them. >> moderator: senator tayler? taylor: on that topic i'm not sure that jackets at that but he calls for the increased budget and it's not realistic certainly within the budgeting process you can ask for the funding request but i've been in the senate for ten years and i know that if you tell some of these folks that things are optional, they are going to believe you and the increases that we need and growth that we have in north dakota takes real resources a

so -- >> host: matthew lee correspondent for the associated press and guy tayler who covers the state department for the "the washington times" headline in "the washington post" today cia seeking drones. the agency is fighting it ever and the move would bolster the military force. one of the topics may i ask about on monday night's debate? >> guest: one of the topics he is unlikely to get a response from the president on because this is a classified program even though it is showing up on the front pages of newspapers. it is true as guy just said this administration has taken a policy or a program that george w. bush instituted in the drone strikes and expanded it vastly beyond where it was before. and that is quite interesting. >> host: space still arizona republican line. >> caller: good morning, gretta i believe 20% of the country do believe what these gentlemen are saying, and i think they are apologists for the obama administration. 80% believe what i believe, and this is in the libya attack it was a shame that our ambassador is killed by these terrorists. we had enough time to t

and it's true that we tayler our tactics for promoting space change to the conditions on the ground in each country. after all, it would be foolish to take a one-size-fits-all approach regardless of circumstances or historical trends. but in the long run, the enduring cooperation that we seek and that our interests and our values demand is difficult to sustain without space legitimacy and the public consent. weeks before the revolution in egypt began i told the arab leaders that the region's foundations were sinking into the sand. it was clear even then that the status quo was unsustainable. that refusal to change was itself becoming a threat to stability. so, for the united states supporting space transition is not a matter of idealism. it is a strategic necessity. and we will not return to the false choice between freedom and stability. and we will not pull back our support from emerging democracies when the going gets rough. that would be a costly strategic mistake that what i believe undermine both our interests and our values. now we recognize that these transitions are not americ