the commission was told my housing advocate deen preston that group housing ways good affordable housing use. and the commission president christine olague, now the district supervisor voted in favor of the group housing. the 2005 waiver of course gave a waiver of two things. the open rear yard didn't have to be provided, because the zoning administrator decided a garage should be put there. and allowed a non-complying structure to expand. i would like to read the finding in the 2005 variance about the parking. the zoning administrator said that he is granting rear yard variance because "it will allow the subject property ownering to provide off-street parking foyt units contained in the building, a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same class of district," and that circumstance certainly hasn't changed. what is really important to note that the appellant was at variance hearing in 2005 and she admitted after that she did not appeal that. why, i don't understand. because the effect of what she is suggesting here now is really a late appeal of that variance s