right now you've got 50-50 categories, women are actually ahead. i don't understand why they would want to diminish their percentage. number two, maybe these women don't want to wear these size ear flow gowns and go and chooses cleanses just wear a tuxedo and go in to one restroom. >> what i was reading i don't think majority of women want to have one category together. they are saying just what you all are saying leave it the way it is. because hollywood is very disproportional right now with women and with the roles and in production all those other things. i have a niece who is an actress, very successful in beverly hills, has been in many films and my sister is the producer. i don't why she likes to be called actor. but she does. she's younger and i think that they just feel like actor was normally what it was to begin with because all actors were either men -- just happens -- >> let heathrow this out there. "forbes" magazine last year, late last year topped ten performers by pay under 30. four of the top five were women. celebrities, i'm sorry

different category.ends up happening, you always get two winners and quite frequently, neither of them ends up being the one that wins the oscar. the hfpa which picks the globes, they opted for auv to"avatar" i of "the hurt locker." i think people assume they are a big hare binger of things to come. we don't know that's the case. >> some think this will be a short list. >> i think it may. scott, thank you very much. along with the golden globes sunday, we have the critics choice awards, next month add mi awards on the 24th. >> award season coming up. >> you've attended the academy awards. >> yes, for "mr. holland's opus." they lock you in. you get there at 3:00, they don't let you eat. then they have the seat fillers, years and years ago. i went to an awards ceremony and a seat filler went home with my date. why is john hawkes being mentioned? >> he is. >> i go back to people you see a lot. i think johnny goodman might be a dark horse nominee this year. >> for "flight." >> probably for "flight." >> it's

no. 4, celeb establishing pricing category. no. 5 change the status of projects using the california debt limit allocation committee. i will talk about the cdlac units. no. 6, allow income levels of qualifying households to exceed those specified in recorded use restrictions under certain circumstances and lastly, authorize the mayor's office of housing to charge a monitoring fee to verify occupancy for affordable rental units where that authority has not been explicit in the past. those are the seven changes, and the mayor's office of housing is here to help you if you have questions on those. as you know, this ordinance was introduced on december 6th, so i want to point out that the version of the ordinance that you have in your packet was prior to when i had the signed form ordinance. we have the signed form ordinance before you now. there are no substantive changes, but we didn't have this at the time that the packet was produced. we are recommending approval of the ordinance. it's in line with adopted city policy both in o

in that income category it's above where our publicly subsidized affordable housing can hit. this is the program that frankly produces housing for the middle-class, who are not able to reach the market. it's impressive over the life of the program. i think you heard a lot of numbers, 1200 units,. that is a good track record. as you all know the housing trust fund was a big package. and within that, and i think really smartly, we don't see it as a giveaway, but we see it as a very intentional and thoughtful policy. it incents on-site bmr to the developer for exchange to producing units, bricks and mortar, permanently affordable housing and developers are rewarded for that. so we should see an increase in the number of bmrs because of that. there is also a piece of trailing legislation that will come before you presumably in the 1st quarter of next year. we think it's a smart idea to make sure that the program is as successful as possible. the idea is to allow more of a range of pricing both of the rental and for-sale, up to a cap, dealing with the low and moderate income categ

that is stunning. >> 9-year-old wallis is the youngest in the category. they are up against naomi watts and the startup "zero dark thirty." bradley cooper is competing with daniel day-lewis for best actor. the academy awards will be handed out february 24. nbc news. >> now that we are filled in on the oscars, we turn now to the golden globes. the awards show will celebrate its 70th anniversary this sunday. for more rican expect on the red carpet, we are -- for more we can expect on the red carpet, we're joined by our guests. >> great to be here. >> before we get to the nominees, a lot of buzz about the hosting change. no longer ricky gervais. instead tina fey and amy pohler. >> i am so excited for them. it is ladies' night all the way. the best and the brightest comedians. they will be so funny. we are not getting any sense of what they are going to do, but i guarantee it is going to be a legendary night in hollywood. i do think it will be kinder and gentler than ricky gervais. >> i think they will ride on each other more than the people in the audience.

this is a whole category but that's the one in the study. if you found this is true, the newer drug will claim it's an improvement or suggested an improvement, plus the impact of the advertising programs and the solicitation of doctors from brands? i don't want to -- we're not here to fault brand drugs and we'll explain that in a minute. but, there is no advertising for the drugs that we're talking about here. the generic drugs. >> very little promotion of generic drugs to consumers or doctors. >> because when the brand drugs goes off patent, you get a variety of generic companies. it's per missibility and for all genarks to enter the competition, correct? >> for the first 6 months, the first generic manufacturer to challenge the patent has exclusivity for 6 months. this is very important because this was created by the hatch wax man act in 1984. and it creates a 6 month exexclusivity for the first generic company because we want judge nark companies to come into the market. after 6 months, the generic drug goes from being a monopoly product

>> starting with what category?>> well, let's start with best movie. >> best movie, it looks as if "lincoln" is ahead with 13-8 odds. i think it has, with the most nominations, it seems to have a consensus, ten of the 18 experts at gold derby are backing that. six are for "argo," two are for "zero dark thirty." >> best actor? >> best actor, daniel day-lewis has this in the bag. 17 of our experts say he's going to win and i think it's safe to say he's on a clear march to the oscar. >> how about best supporting actor or actress? >> best supporting actress is pretty much anne hathaway's to win here. watch out for sally field potentially. >> let's talk about the upsets. i think those are always the interesting ones that jump out at us. i've got a few in mind. i'm wondering what you see. >> i think everyone has got this progostication wrong. i think it's going to be "argo's" big night. they are starstruck at the golden globes. "argo" isn't just ben affleck's achievement. remember who produced it. it's george clooney. i t

there are nine pictures and five categories. i don't wake up feeling sorry for ben affleck, today i do feel sorry for ben and katherine bigelow who directed "zero dark thirty" and kwinten tarentino, whose pick furs was nominated but he wasn't. >> that is django. >> right. >> katherine and ben affleck for argo, why do you think those didn't get nominated? >> well, i don't really have the answer it that. chairman of sony was quoted in the "los angeles times" today being befuddled. i'm sure she was. it's directors voting for directors. so the one thing you can say, is their peers opted to vote for these specific directors. one of the movies, nominated in both the best foreign language film as well as best picture category, is literally the whole movie takes place in two rooms. they are rewarding the performance. katherine begelow created a movie about the greatest manhunt in history that probably had 50 locations and was a much more complicated move oe to mount. where there is a consensus is "lincol "lincoln." it is the most honore

the best actor category, a strong category but a big snub it seems in this category. nominees are bradley cooper, daniel day lewis, hugh jackman, denzel washington, and no john hawkes for "the sessions." a lot of people thought he would get it. best actress. jessica chastain, jennifer laurence, naomi watts, guvenzhane wallis. and naomi watts. such a great performance. we also had the supporting categories, this, again, for the men, a very strong category, this year the nominees for best supporting actor are alan arkin or "argo." robert de niro for "silver linings playbook." we also got philipp seymour hoffman for "the master." and some people thought leonardo dicaprio would get a nomination or samuel l. jackson would get a nomination but neither did. beth suft porting actress, amy adams, sally field who was masterful in that movie. helen hunt, anne hathaway, and we just heard scott fine burgh say it's been 31 years since a movie has been nominated in every major category and that happened this year for "silver linings playbook." this could be the year of this small mo

because they can report in different categories and actually required to. and we will have to know much more about them and their payroll expense will need to be reported still for the tax and also in most cases for how they allocate, in san francisco out of san francisco taxes. for the business registration fees currently there are four fees ranging from $25 to $500. depending on your level of payroll expense. and as you may assume, most businesses just pay the $25 registration fee because they don't have payroll expense. but when we move to the new registration fees, starting in 2014, we now move to 13 different levels. rates will go up for every single business and they will have to report to us their gross receipts versus their payroll and that is what will actually be determining what they pay. so if you had a business where you had no payroll expense previously, but you were bringing in over $1 million in revenues because you were selling something on ebay or something that got you that amount of money, then you were -- then you will have to pay us a

it is illegal category -- a legal category. having that said, i think it is inevitable that people are drawn to and concern about this debate. i think there is room for academic research. i think we have relatively little empirical knowledge about how important these words actually are. do people react differently when you talk about slavery versus trafficking? i am sure that there are pulling groups -- polling groups -- who is pulling -- polling this? how can this message to be better conveyed? clearly there is rhetorical important in defining slavery. there is room for research on the question of how important it is to determine, are there other ways -- how does the kremlin of this defect -- the framing of this affect others? whether it be potential victims who may be in danger of being trafficked, and may not have other alternatives, but may be informed, to a least some degree, about how to choose among the options given to them with fuller awareness of the consequences that may result. encouraging community norms to change.

you'll each be picking a category.your partner to guess as many words or phrases in that category in 30 seconds. the team with the highest score after we clear the board is a winner. any questions? sure. all right. you got anything? >> jimmy: good luck. >> oh, good luck to you too. [ laughter ] >> steve: all right. here's our -- here's our categories tonight. "e-i-e-i-o." >> jimmy: oh, okay. fun. >> steve: "catch me if you can." "june's saloon." >> jimmy: okay. >> steve: "know when to fold 'em." "it's in the bag." and "to infinity and beyond." betty, why don't you pick the first category? >> well, it's something i should learn but i haven't yet. "know when to fold 'em." >> steve: "know when to fold 'em." [ laughter ] these are things you fold. give you 30 seconds on the clock. >> okay. >> steve: and -- >> all right -- morning readable. >> a book. paper. >> yes. well -- >> newspaper. [ ping sound ] >> yes, got it. things you wear. >> shirt. pants. >> generally. >> clothes. [ ping sound ] >> uh-huh. moola. >> money. >> u

how many categories of business. people like to think oh, small business owner but it's maybe 55 categories and this may be a complicated one and fin facts but they write articles about this >> great job. >> next item please. commissioners item 8 discussion on proposition e this is a discussion item >> so commissioners we've been fielding questions through our office and other business organs of wanting a review about prop e i thought today would be a good time to go over some basics. if there's any concerns, what's ahead because i'm sure you'll be fielding some questions as well. and while there is a good deal of work happening in the background like the transition of the different payroll tax incentiv incentives. the tax and treasures office is beginning their implementation but the basic concepts are we we need to help business prepare for a transition. so in your binder is a - is information that we've put together so that if i go to a business association that i hand this out to walk them through. some of this i

gun violence falls into a similar category. if we speak for those we lost, if we speak for our children and families, if we have the courage to new -- to do what we know is the right thing to do, then we will have the most powerful voice, and we, citizens will change the nation. i have been in this fight for a long time. i have no illusions about the fight that is in front of us. i have no illusions about distortion that will come from all sides, but i know full well the political obstacles that will be thrown up against this are not impenetrable. i have no illusions about how hard it will be, but i know this, we have no choice. we will not be able to look our kids and grandkids in i if we do not use every energy, every fiber in our being to try to keep them safer. i will not be worthy of the generation that will grow up now without those 20 kids and the thousands of people already lost. we will not be able to stop every act of senses -- senseless pilots, but that is no excuse to do nothing. that is not an excuse to do nothing.

there are now ten categories of -- categories of people that are prohibited from the ability to possess firearms, that they basically lost their second amendment right, which i believe in, and they forfeit it. and that category includes people who have been convicted of felonies, that are fugitives from justice. in fact, federal law since 1968 says people who are using or addicted to drugs are prohibited from possessing firearms. those who are adjudicated mentally ill. the most important thing we can do as a nation and state by state is making sure there is a universal background check. since its inception, and that is the nix system, the background with the brady law, there has been approximately two million prohibited persons who have tried to purchase firearms that have been stopped. nearly 48% of those people have been convicted felons. i think it's one of the most important thing we can do. i think it's a thing that is going the pass in this state. i think that's why you see governors o'malley and cuomo and others going forward on that. but it's most essential, most important for t

. >> shakespeare is in a different category-- category, shakespeare is in the category that dante is in, that homer is in, that category that, what is fascinating is that this category, we assume somehow is only for gods but this is a human being. that is what is interesting. >> that is the point you want to make. >> this is a human being. elaborate because that is one of the points you want to make. >> this is not a god this was say leviving the breathing, human being. >> by the time this man was 20 years old, he 4 three children, he had no job, no vocation. hen't know what to do, his father's blood business is falling part. he hadn't gone to oxford, the family had lost its money. there was a religion that the family was associated with, was dangerous and percent kate-- purse cuted. there was not a future for him. they figured out to have not only a future but how to express this extraordinary thing he had inside him that is the remarkable story. >> rose: what de teach you about love. >> he teaches that you can write brilliantly about love without ever fully having it. >> what does

has made the's film prestigious best category. >> the recognition and being invited to the party is a lot of fun. >> the film of life of supply featuring a computer-generated tiger received 11 nominations. >> it makes for an interesting story. the youngest ever nominee for her performance in beasts of the southern wild. and the 85-year-old is the oldest ever nominee in the category for her performance. >> you know what that means. >> leading the charge with eight nominations, including one for a huge jackman as leading actor, to whom i spoke recently. >> it is the industry, and no offense to a australia, but it is fun. >> the latest bond movie was overlooked for the best picture award, but the opening number was one of five nomination. it would be a remarkable time in the life of the singer from london. >> i love them all, it will be hard to pick. get out dates on all of the story using any time on our web site. thank you for watching in tune in tomorrow. >> the funding of this presentation is made possible by the free menfoundation of new york, stowe, vermont, and honolulu. newman's

and tv categories, they also have a best song category so there's musicians there, too.ars ago once, i was waiting in line for the men's room and i was right in front of elton john and right in back of billy bob thorton and they started talking to each other, kind of over my shoulder. so i got to witness this very bizarre conversation between these two people that didn't know each other but met in the men's room line at the golden globes. but that's the beauty of the golden globes. >> sure. sure. i got to ask you what are your predictions? who do you think is going to come away with a golden globe? >> what's great about this year is that it's a true race. there's a lot of move says there could actually win. in the major category, best motion picture drama, "lincoln" is the safe bet but i wouldn't be surprised if a movie like "argo" ends up wing and i think ben affleck who did not get a nomination for the academy awards for best actor could actually win the golden globe tonight. i think "les miserables" will do well because the golden globes have comedy and musical catego

let's go through the categories. walking wounded and anybody tha follows directions and get up and walk and it's green. d is delayed and anybody that i injured but we don't think it's life-threatening. i is the people that need treatment right now and d is th dead and black and during triag you open an air way and how lon does that take? two seconds and it takes ten seconds to check and bleeding - the only bleeding i want you to treat during triage are arteria bleeding and spurting out and you could bleed to death in about three minutes and shock and if the person is unconsciou on the chair and how do i treat for shock? lay down and lift the feet and cover you and takes ten -15 seconds and i move on. the categories, black for peopl that are dead and green people that are walking and the only two categories left are red and yellow. this rule here that i'm going t teach you now and i want you to memorize it and this is the rul that is going to determine whether you're red or you're yellow. the rule is 32 can do. i want

supporting actor category features five former oscar winners. in the supporting actress category, amy adams, sally field anne hathaway and jackie weaver. sill her veings playbook is the first film since red since 1991 to get nominations in all four ago acting categories plus directing, writing and best picture. sounds like a silver lining to me. >> besides director of silver linings, other director is for amore and life of pi and steven spielberg for lincoln. oscars will be hand out february 24th on abc. >>> and good news to tell you now, the wife of california lieutenant governor gavin newsom is among those for academy award. she was executive producer on the documentary called the invisible war. she tweeted about the nomination today. it examines sexual assaults in the u.s. military. >> he tweets, congratulations to my amazing wife. >> you can see who wins on sunday february 24th when the oscars are announced live. check out our app. there is a list of nominees and when you log in with facebook you can share your pictures with your friends. sh

. >> and the fact that category of best picture is almost twice as big as that of best director whichmeans someone got robbed. >> rose: they have nine nominations for best picture. >> if we placed this in perspective who did the nominating of the five directors, right? i check and you know how many, the directors branch of the academy, how many messages there are? 371 people did these nominations. it is not just captain bigelow, i was surprised ben affleck was not nominated. >> rose: we all would have nominated for best director ben affleck. >> we prove he directed three features and gets better and better, quentin tarantino as well. >> when i compared them to the directors guild nominations addressed two days ago and have 15,000 members voting perhaps a better cross-section of the industry, well, it was spielberg and ang lee, but they nominated tom hooper, and excuse me i just blanked for a second i had it in my head a second ago, ben affleck and captain bigelow, so what happened was that -- excellent -- but ben assign lynn and michael hanukkah cannot be crying these two wonderful di

winners in domestic and foreign stocks categories. let me bring them to the stage now and we will introduce them after this short break. welcome and congratulations. good to see you. i've always had to keep my eye on her... but, i didn't always watch out for myself. with so much noise about health care... i tuned it all out. with unitedhealthcare, i get information that matters... my individual health profile. not random statistics. they even reward me for addressing my health risks. so i'm doing fine... but she's still going to give me a heart attack. we're more than 78,000 people looking out for more than 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. that if you pick three people, odds are they'll approach everything in their own unique way -- including investing. so we help clients identify and prioritize their life goals. taking that input and directly matching assets and risk preferences against them. the result? a fully customized plan. we call it goals driven investing. you have unique goals. how about a por

now honestly "brave" wouldn't have made it into that category this year.in 2003 the best picture of the year was "lord of the rings return of the king" and "finding nemo" won best animated picture and people would say that is one of the best movies of the last 10, 15, 20 years. >> they are so much more than animated. >> they are not cartoons. they are fmovies and many think we ought to be in the big boy or big girl category. >> i vote for "shrek." >> exactly. is donkey supporting actor then? >> thanks so much. we'll check in with mike for a look at the morning commute. >> i think about cartoons. not animated features but "tom and jerry" type cartoons. a nice smooth drive through the south bay. this commute we do have a couple key issues in key spots. here look at this. north 101. we do have a crash just around mckee. that took five minutes. just five minutes to clear from the roadway but that caused the backup to kick off. some folks bail out and take 280 northbound. heavier flow. a little earlier slowdown heading down through downtown possibly leading to

some animators feel that category is designed to keep their movies away from the best picture category. now, "brave" most likely wouldn't have gotten a nomination for best picture. it was a nice movie but not the best picture. but there have been animated movies in the past that could have won the big prize. remember back in 2003, the best picture was "lord of the rings, return of the king." "finding nemo" came out that same here. it won best animated feature. but film historians now call "finding nemo" one of the best films, period. but it was never nominated for the big, big prize. >>> video out of north korea this morning to your newsroom of eric schmidt, chairman of google. there he is on the left-hand side behind the tv camera. he's talking to the press. he called for greater internet freedom in north korea. maybe not a surprise particularly. google's always stood for internet freedom. but this is news wouworthy beca while it's easy to criticize north korea, it's more difficult to do it while you are in north korea. a few minutes ago, president obama officially nominated jack lew

i don't think there was any surprise in that category at all.k with "les miserables." >> i think ann will win and one prediction was jacki weaver. she didn't get nominated leading up to it, plays the mom. she is an australian actress that plays the mom and i was happy to see her get in. it will be tough for her to beat ann hathaway. that performance is off the charts. >> supporting actor. a lot of repeat winners. de niro, tommie lee jones and alan arkin. people have a soft spot for. >> i think alan arkin will be the person who has the oscar win the longest to go. i think it was 40 years ago, i believe. >> he just won for "little miss sunshine." >> you're right. it's five heavy hitters. who knows what will happen. this is the category of all the acting races the most wide open. couldn't you see any of these guys winning. >> and they would all be thrilled. seth mcfarland, we saw he made a lot of jokes giving us a sneak peek what's in store. >> and the ricky gervais style of hosting may be back. >> and harvey weinstein. >> that was good and bad. >>