, where people were trying to challenge california's three strikes law when a man by the name of mr. ewing stole golf clubs of, i don't know, a few hundred dollars worth, and got a life sentence for that because he was a third time offender. i think the problem with three strikes law is that they're overbroad, that they don't actually permit judges to look at the individual circumstances. i don't think nonviolent strikes, nonviolent offenses should serve -- should serve as strikes. i do think that society and judges are supposed to have the ability to take into account a person's criminal history and criminal record in determining a sentence. so if somebody has a long rap sheet, that's going to be part of the sentencing decision. but to tie judges hands do not given any opportunity to look at an individual's history, to look at the facts of the case, determine whether this person needs to be in prison and incapacitated for a long period of time, or not, to me is a real problem. that's two strikes to me is really a problem. i mean, we in california them something like 25% of people serving