does it not? x you can say that about any of you. >> you canant -- say that about any of these. >> i just want to get to the facts. it increases the baseline spending above what we projected, over a trillion dollars. yes or no? >> the sequester was set up to be a failsafe. it was always meant to be replaced. it was meant to backstop the work of the joint committee. -- that matter >> i would just remind us all that we are asking them technical questions. let's let them respond. >> i am just asking a simple question, a technical question here and i need a simple answer. not politics,rs not what you thought the sequester was or might be and was never intended to be. it was signed by the president of the united states. it was passed by the congress of the united states. and if you don't adhere to that, spending above the current baseline of over $1 trillion. yes or no? x true, but i would say that -- mr. would say also that ryan -- >> where do you get the race for $1 trillion in new spending? >> again

the concrete does not have any rebar in it. despite the fact that it is between the new first and second floor and here is the foundation of the building. have somebody explain, how the 80-year-old foundations are going to be inserted into the walls between the floors and ceilings of the new building. have somebody explain how any of the elements of this building could do support two new floors, it can't be done. the building code does not permit it. this is a demolition. and this is smoke and mirrors. and they come in and they wave, you know, we are going to do everything correctly is all that you hear and we are never getting any specifics. have them explain, how the foundation stayed in the building, it has been very frustrating because when we went to the planning commission he said that it was presented to the commission that is not true at all. the calculations were not there and there was no discussion and the planning commission had to listen to what a great guy mel is, and none of the technical questions were ever resp

does he share my concern about this tragic loss of life? is he aware of a campaign run for myself and other colleagues more broadly to improve the road? people don't understand the current budgetary restraints, simply a fair share of resources spent well, i'm grateful to my honorable friend for bring me up to date with this important campaign that he and others are meeting in norfolk. we do have a much better record oon road safety to we vetted recent years but we should never be complacent but we should continue to work on that. i know that money has been made available for road schemes in norfolk. of course, i can see from the transfer minister nodding vigorously behind my honorable friend there may be more to,. >> -- more to come. >> does the prime minister i agree with me that people are suffering under depression and it would be the wrong politics at this time tournament to 50 the top rate of tax? and will be now, with the now canceled next month's tax cut for millionaires? [shouting] spent the point i would make to the honorable lady

chan does not operate a bank, a savings and loan and a credit union and does not have a license to do so. the photographs taken by the neighbors tell the whole story, there was a lot of work done here and long before they had any permits. we urge you to send this through the conditional use process. >> thank you. >> mr. gladstone? >> well, first of all, financial services are complicated. mr. sanchez, looked under the wrong company. the document that i have here is signature invest tores inc document, chan listed below and it says investment advisory services offered through significant tour inc a registered investment advisor. this provides information about allfred chan that supplements the form, adv part 2 a brochure of signature investments inc. so if mr. williams or sanchez had looked under the name of the licensee which is actually signature investments and investors inc. it would have found that there is a registered investment advisory company there who owns it allfred chan. you don't need to have the dba, the business name that is in there that signed the lease is sorry the b

the house does, and house largely leaves defense alone, senate does not, without sounding like opening of the odd couple how can different budget authors get together without driving each other crazy? by seeing where their common ground sudde isn't so crazy. there is more to the polar opposites than might meet the eye. when a possible breakthrough dial that might, might, break a logjam, it is true, i feel it in my bones. do i have rocks in my skull? i guess sherri, i am looking at you, and i am looking at how republicans -- versus their own, but i do see, an attempt on part of senate while they do raise taxes, i'm never a fan of that. they don't deal with additional income tax hikes, that lead niece believe there is a correctioner there for commensurate to satisfy boy? >> i think there is their first offer, it will have to be democrats who compromise more. if you want to look into a crystal ball. if is no coincidence that handful of democratic senators who voted against senate budget were up for reelection next year. they know that their constituents and the country is not going for a

it just, sort of--" come on, gang, where does it go? where does it go? it gives it to the surrounding air. and as the ice freezes, it heats up the air, and it keeps that air at a nice, steady zero. just like your water boiling stays at a hundred all the time. in this, you'll keep your air at zero degrees. and your crops aren't gonna freeze at zero. you know why? you could get sugar and salt in those jars, and that sugar and salt will lower the freezing point to below zero. and so the only thing it would freeze at zero is the stuff in that can-- in that big pot or other jars of water. but the jars of water, all that sugar and salt, so they're okay. in this case, we change a state. you go this way, you get energy out. that energy will help you. go this way, energy in. a friend just got burned. said, "oh, my god, i don't know if he got burned with steam or boiling water." but they're both the same temperature, so the burns must be the same. what do you say? "honey, they're not the same. "because if it was a steam burn, i don't wanna hear it was a steam burn

how does he think he would save? >> it's this job that has seen the deficit come down by a third since he became chancellor. and private sector jobs. he's cutting the country out of a whole we were left in by the party opposite. [cheering and applause] [inaudible] >> the prime minister welcome. the country's first local enterprise fund people who care have raised 400,000 pounds to invest in businesses and encouraging enterprise securing employment and in so many others where they lead the rest of the country -- [inaudible] i'm sure my friend is right about that the leadership of all things. he makes an important point, need to see more small businesses start, more enterprise. we need to see more to keep the private sector going. >> alex cunningham. >> rising unemployment remains an issue in my constituency. based on the reemployment and recession which claims hard working families in the most vulnerable for the obscene tax for millionaires. [cheering and applause] -- looks at the figures today he'll see there are 131

so this budget that's before us today does not balance, it does not put us on a sound path, it does not create confidence in the -- among the american citizens that the future is going to be sound, that we've gotten this country reoriented in a way that's going to produce long-term growth. indeed, it's going to do exactly the opposite. it's going to do exactly the opposite. it's going to once again say this senate is not willing to do the things necessary to put america on a sound course. and it's not that hard. we can do this. it's within our grasp. but our leadership in this senate, contrary to the house, is not willing to take those good, solid, but achievable steps necessary to put this country on a sound path. i just feel that very deeply, and hopefully in the context of our debate and a budget being moved through here on a party-line vote, i suppose, as it was in committee, that maybe some connection will be made amongst ourselves and our members and our brains about the real issues facing the country and what we need to do to get on a right path. and maybe even in conference, if

why does it sink? the balloons you see at the end of the string, at the circus, honey, those are filled with helium, okay? but why is it you blow a balloon up with air and it sinks. how about that air gang? is that air more dense or less dense than the air outside? it's a little bit more dense. do you know why? because the stretched rubber is tending to compress it. so it's slightly compressed. so it's more dense than outside. that means its volume of air will weigh more than the equal volume of-- this is going to sink, but they use helium. the helium is very very light, not as heavy, huh. each molecule is not as heavy. so it is not as dense. so the helium-filled balloon is simply lighter than the buoyant force and up it goes. but here is a point too. we get that buoyant force because of a difference in pressure. is that right? a difference in pressure, always more pressure on the bottom because it's deeper than the top. so i got a question. if someone says to you, "hey, i understand "the atmospheric p

first read says does not offer a hint of compromise and does not acknowledge the last election.ll detail the new budget and questions of whether ryan is even capable of cutting a deal. >>> plus another protest planned for tonight after a 16-year-old new york boy was shot and killed by an undercover nypd detective. police say the teen pointed a gun at them. witnesses are telling a different story. we'll look at what's happening there. it is all coming up next on "news nation." asional have constipation, diarrhea, gas, bloating? yes! one phillips' colon health probiotic cap each day helps defend against these digestive issues... with three strains of good bacteria. [ phillips' lady ] live the regular life. phillips'. bikes and balloons, and noodles on spoons. a kite, a breeze, a dunk of grilled cheese. catches and throws, and spaghettio's. a wand, some wings, soup with good things. sidewalks and doodles and wholesome noodles. puddles and pails and yes, puppy dog tails. for a lunch like this, there's a hug and a kiss. because that's what happy kids are made of. campbell's. it's ama

means it's time for tech talk did you know twitter turned seven today and they've obtained a what does it mean for those of us that tweet we'll find out later in the show. there is a march twenty first five pm here in washington d.c. i'm liz wall and you're watching our t.v. . we begin today with guantanamo bay as a hunger strike there continues a general is now telling congress that the base needs one hundred seventy million dollars for repairs general john kelly the top commander of the u.s. southern command says the bases in dire need of upgrades he says the barracks and dining hall are teary orating general kelly says these repairs are critical for u.s. troops stationed guantanamo bay but he says conditions detainees are living in are just fine if their prisoners are still on a hunger strike after forty four days they say it's a protest the conditions they live in and that copies of the koran were taken from them and mishandled general kelly says the real reason the prisoners are on strike is because they're angry at the president for not closing the prison like he said he would di

it does not. the only way in which that blag's arguments for the constitutionality of the statute have any prospect of being upheld is if the court adopts the minimal rationality standard of lee optical. >> let me take you back to your example. your position seems to me one gets in, two stay out, even though your legal arguments would lead to the conclusion that they should all be treated the same. >> the question before the court is whether the exclusion that doma imposes violates equal protection and it does because you cannot treat this as though it were a distinction between optometrists and ophthalmologists ezell lee optical tasted. this is a different kind of situation because the discrimination here is being visited on a group that historically been subjected terrible discrimination on the basis of personal -- >> but that is the same in the example that we just gave you. that discrimination would have been visited on the same group and you say there it is ok. >> i did not say that. i said i

why does it cool? begin with a x. - expand. - expands. it expands just like a helium-filled balloon would expand, wouldn't it? and so when the air expands, then the air cools. hc? i got a demonstration for you all to try right there at your seats. are you ready? everyone have a hand? put your hand in front of your mouth and with your mouth open, so when you breath-- so the air doesn't expand, i want you to blow. a little disruption right there. okay. now bring your mouth down really tight, so the air expands when it comes out. notice any difference in temperature? yeah. try it again, gang. open mouth. open mouth. now close mouth, so the air expands. okay, you wanna see that more dramatically? watch this. here's some steam here, huh. would i dare to take this glove away? yeah. yeah, easy, easy saying that. no problem. hot or cold? begin with a c. it's cool. relatively cool. hc? i'm not gonna put it way down at the nozzle. it turns out that that which you are seeing here, gang, is not steam. that which y

>> how does the waiting period? >> what is the... does he have to get sign-off for the days? >> so, this is assuming that they have gotten all of the permanent place of entertainment sign-off and not going to be necessary. that is just duplicative. what we are trying to do here is find a method and find a tool, find a set of conditions that work and move ahead. the only instructions from you that i am looking for is not how to move the paper around i know how to do that, it is about the sound issue. that is the issue that we struggle with is that you have now got to struggle with because you are policy body. so i need that kind of direction from you. not you don't worry about how they come in or don't come in or how i communicate. >> okay. >> so to issue the one-day permit, the second one day permit, provided that they met all of the criteria of the sound for the first one-day permit. >> excellent. >> is that right. >> somebody else do this. >> i have a better way of doing it? >> i think that, i guess that this is an instruction to staff, this is not a motion. so the instruct

what he does and does what he says. i feel no reason to delay any more. >> primarily from the design and impact it is quite different from the procedural issues that have been the majority of the arguments being made. to me, to the proposed structure, starts when they (inaudible) approach to a down hillside which is very appropriate. it starts with a relatively low starting point, and at crown terrace street which is also very appropriate. the issue of what is a demolition or not, is in the calculations. it has been determined by the department that it is not a demolition. i look at it at code section as no different than any other code sections, the people in a 40-foot high limit will sometimes want to build up to the high limit and they are going to want to use the exceptions in there for either penthouses or elevator structures or etc.. and it is just another requirement that one deals with. i don't see this as a defacto demolition given that both the planning and the building department have checked the details and

caller: my question for bill is does does he think the president's white house is more transparent than the past presidencies or is as transparent as he campaigned that it would be? host: i guess the other part of that question is, how do you measure transparancy? guest: i am glad you brought that up. they came into office, this white house, saying we are going to be the most transparent white house ever. they are not any more transparent than any other white house, because it doesn't suit them to be. they will cite all kinds of statistics that show how many interviews and so forth, but as we discussed earlier, it is really not the point. it is about making the decision-making processes, about explaining the process of making decisions, which they don't particularly do very well, because it doesn't serve their own interest to do it. i understand why, but the claim of transparancy is not credible. host: in covering five presidents, you are your most memorable moment public or private. guest: i would have to say privately it is off the record in general with presidents reagan, bush 43, an

neither does washington. it is time for responsible -- irresponsible action. -- for responsible action. >> you talk about why it is necessary to tackle the debt crisis. i would like to yield two minutes to the senior kemp -- senior member of the committee. >> any of you have ever been to spain? i have. nice, hard-working people. great food. verye time, it was a prosperous and growing economy. spain does not have a prosperous economy today. half of all people under 25 years old cannot find a job. there's -- people on government provided health care go and because they have had to cut back hours of service and operation, people cannot get the health care they need when they need it. why did this happen? they did what we should not do. borrowedt too much, too much, and let it go on until they had a debt crisis. when that hit, they had to make corrections in all of this stuff overnight. now, they have this economy. we cannot let that happen here. balancing this budget is not about making cpas like me feel good. i

i think one does vote on one, does one vote on one's own recusal? >> no, he did not. not on another but do you recuse? >> i think if you recuse then you vote. i don't know how that is to be reflected button page 3 it should say he recused and not retaining. >> on page 4 as well and finally with respect to top of page 5, the closed session doesn't properly disclose consistent with 67.16 who was present in the closed session. >> 67.15 of the ordinance has specific language about closed the minutes of a closed session which asks to include who was present and it's not clear from the context who was. so those are my suggested amendments to the minutes. thanks. >> did you get those? they all seem? any other amendments to the minutes? is there a motion to approve the minutes? >> so moved. >> all in favor? >> aye. >> none opposed. it passes.

it does not let the tenant of the hot. the tenants in their lease is contractually responsible to the landlord. there are ways that can be dealt with between the landlord and the tenant. i have represented landlords. i have represented tenants. at some point, i represented both because they have a common interest even in that. obviously, they both have to make the space accessible either now or later, so it is best that they work together if they can. and work together to save us -- to hire a single lawyer. they can make repairs or what ever is in their agreement. sometimes, when the tenant is the small business and does not have much cash flow, one way to do is to renegotiate the lease, where the cost is amortized over a longer period time. it is another way to spread the payments back to the less financially available person. would you do if you get one of these notices? if you have not had your property inspected already, or if you do not do it following this program -- which i recommend you do -- you should have an ins

. >> a clear indication of the size of that deck and it does extend into the rear yard as does the property extends into the rear yard. it is not only a fire escape as you look here, this extends back and there is a deck on top. the large portion of this extends the rear yard. and i stated that. that this does not extend into the rear yard i am just pointing out that it is an adjacent neighbor that has direct access to the private open space. in my estimation it is in the rear yard and it is relatively in the rear yard, that is the common to all areas, all of the structures because it is 20 and a half feet of a blank wall. as far as the directions, here is the occasional of how much shadow is being cast? >> i am sorry. >> okay. >> okay. so this is a diagram of the proposed deck. and you can see this on the shadow that is being cast on my clients' property and so as far as the mislabeling of the directions, i mean i was aware of that early on and i did not address it, i did not think that it had much impact on to any of the site conditions, as you can see there is a tremendous amount of shad

it does exactly what the natural sugar does, too. there are 56 names for sugar you don't know them. >> stephen: had you do you know i don't know them. maybe i'm an eskimo of sugar. i have 56 names for snow. >> maybe you do. the rest of the country doesn't and they are buying it and they don't know it. >> stephen: dr.s but -- dr. buzz kill. >> you gave me that name. >> stephen: you throw around the word processed food. >> they take the fiber out for shelf life. fine fiber is good four. it reduces how fast the stuff in your intestines is absorbs and it keeps your liver safe steefnlg that's what the box is for fiber. >> the wrapper has more health benefits usually than the food does. really. [cheers and applause] >> stephen: so what are the more nutritious wrappers i should be feeding my children? doctor,ing thank you so much -- doctor, thank you

this budget does nothing of that sort. i cannot see how people simpson is among the reasons why he supports it. >> thank you. there is a similarity in there was a cause for a spending reduction in our tax code, the credits and bypassing collection. senator sanders was referring to the cayman islands earlier. i believe senator levin has talked about $70 billion in net revenue, companies that do not pay a cent in taxes. that type of spending through credits and deductions has grown phenomenally. the powerful in our country, the want their projects to be funded through the tax code, because unlike a preparations, it is not examined every year. that is a very clever strategy and puts them in a very different class and working people who are benefited by programs that are funded every year. it is unacceptable if you come to the core concept of fairness. the actual language in the reconciliation instruction refers to the level of revenues. the explanatory instructions in the back, page 61, talks specifically about addressing thi

that's what we believe our bill does. this is what their bill does. i recommend that we support the skills act and reject this amendment and i reserve the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman from minnesota reserves the balance of his time. the gentleman from massachusetts. >> thank you. at this time i'd like to yield three minutes to the gentleman . om texas >> i rise in support of this bill because the congress has a responsibility to modernize this nation's public work force training and adult educational system. putting america back to work must be a top priority for congress and the nation. this tierney-hinojosa-miller amendment would bolster the role of community colleges in job training by authorizing president obama's $8 billion community college to career fund. mr. hinojosa: it would develop a 21st century system for adult education literacy and workplace services, it would engage our nation's youth through multiple pathways to success. it would create competitive employment services and opportunities for individuals with disabilities

does that make sense? >> yes, we can construct a random test, and this has been done, where we compare, we make the blackface is famous, admiral blackface is, and we make the white faces some of the better known mass murderers, and this produces a different result, not surprisingly, so it does make a difference. it is for that reason we do not use famous people's faces in this, but if you match the faces, using famous white and famous black, you will get the same. there is one on the web with cute little black and white children. tavis: even with babies. >> yes, and five-year-olds. it was very disturbing. this is not to say that people treat kids the way they treat adults or treat stars the way they treat unknown, but the test actually sort of filters all of that out. it is just race, and race makes a huge difference in our society. tavis: how to be juxtaposed the reality of your research results with the human jenna project, which basically tells us we ain't different. how do we juxtapose those? >> it is

does it grab you? does it scare hillary? would it reunite the republican party?oes it scare hillary or should it? i'm joined by david corn and john feehery. bush is running around. called laura back. now he's out there pushing a right of center -- far right of center immigration proposal which he's notched back from. but he's running for it. what's happening? >> he's putting himself out there. for the past few months after the republicans lost, people kept saying bush is the answer. bush can help us. bush can lead us out of the wilderness with latino voters. that's who they kept looking to. >> what was the timeline on this? when was bush high? >> well, i think starting with the election. >> then got blown away. >> blown away. the thing is, here he comes out. i think he's completely botched what he was supposed to be good at. >> made a bad move. people have all made bad moves in the beginning. but i want to know about positioning. is he positioned somewhere between now if he sticks with this tougher position on immigration, is he positioned to the right of rubio a

does but it does eliminate the imported benefits and patient protections -- this budget does eliminate the important benefits and pay some protections in obamacare. it will eliminate the benefits or tax credits to afford health care in the exchanges. it will eliminate tax credits for small businesses. but it keeps the rest. it keeps all the parts the reduce the deficit -- the parts that reduce the deficit. we were told last fall than those savings would result of the dow hospitals shutting down, nursing homes shutting down in a parade of other horrible consequences. those scare tactics were not true then and they're not true today. that is what all those says -- all those savings are included in this budget for us today. remember all the tax revenues in obamacare? those higher income individuals and in industries that will benefit from obamacare expanding coverage -- all those taxes and revenues are includedare includn budget. in fact, a dirty little secret is this budget would not balance if not for the medicare savings and revenues, in obamacare. look at this chart here. in the 10th

president obama does not really have a plan. it is really kind of awful to watch and we will pay the price. >> beyond sequester, we have something else going on, and we saw it last year in the election. we really have two different views of which way the country should go, and that is what is holding us up. the election decided which way the country wants to go and president obama has a sense of where he wants to take it, but we have republicans resisting. we are going to have another fight later this year over the debt limit. it is not just a question of the debt and deficit. it is the direction of the country and policy. no tax increases, nothing, off the table, we are stuck. experts when the republicans start to feel this? -- >> when does the public starts to feel this? we have heard that april 1st is when we see the real political fallout. >> between now and 1995 is that than it was immediate when they close down the government. this is gradual. the first thing is the grants that do not go out, the contracts. it will be awhi

that does not exist. you would need to go back and look at the kinds of substitutions that older americans make. you needed to go to the data for that. chained cpi-e would grow slower than cpi-e but faster than cpi-w. -- cpi-u. it is not clear if you would grow faster than the cpi-w. you would need to calculate it. switching to the chained cpi-e, in my view, does not necessarily improve the accuracy of cost-of- living adjustments in social security. if we want to keep purchasing power relatively constant over person's lifetime and want social security to be a true it real annuity, it is probably not a great idea to make that switch. my colleague has made the point that we want the purchasing power of social security benefits to grow over person's retirement, because that might encourage a logger, years. you might work part time to supplement social security benefits, and when you are no longer able to do that at older ages, you get increasing levels of benefits in real terms. we need to make some adjustme

i will skip the staff update because it does not matter. (inaudible) was given a suspension and the likelihood of appeal was high and in fact they did appeal the suspension. the permit holder, or the staff member, we have not had one of these short terms suspensions appealed yet and so we have not done this before, so we are trying to figure out how to agendaize in front of you. i want you to know that we may need to call a special hearing because we don't have another regular hearing between now and april second and you can see that it is going to be very busy. be aware that if i can come to some figure on how to bring this to you i might be requesting a special hearing. >> how many warning do you have to give? >> these are questions that i am waiting on for the city attorney and this is a due process issue but i will let you know as soon as possible. you do want us to take the stuff out of the legislation and take them home and out of the books >> absolutely. take them home. >> i need a copy of that. >> it is not in your book. >> you know

he says he does not not why the fire started. according to reports, this house was destroyed and the house next door suffered thousands of dollars in damages. if you look closely, you can see the neighbor's home on fire. apparently two cars were also damaged. we hear firefighters approaching and when they arrive, it takes them about 30 minutes to control this fire. and they did save the two cats inside. >> oh, good for those firefighters. love they go in and even rescue cats. >>> we've seen dogs surf, we've seen monkeys ride on the backs of pigs. but a pig surf, never seen that until now. i give you zorro. >> the pig is six weeks old and surfing for three weeks in new zeala zealand. that man matthew bell. his family raises pigs. he skwaelz whqueals when he is good time. the surf board has a built of a modification. burlap and some go for him to stan on. not like he is staying in one spot. >> the best suchers learn when they are very young. >> he is only do it for a few months, then he'll be too big and maevehvy. >> then and dream

does this hurt his credibility? >> i think it does, but more importantly, it hurtshis overall agenda. this president wants an agenda that is spending more and building up a government that does more for the people and take some of the marketplace instead of the private sector. it only hurts him and his credibility, but his agenda that spending is not a problem, which is what he wants us to believe. so he misses out on maki some of his core principle arguments if this or that happens, sequester going into effect, american people do not see the ramifications that he said that we would see. >> i am just wondering about the next debacle to come. that is the end of march phenomenon where we could look3 at a potential shutdown again. this was really tired of this? >> yes, we do, but i think the market has figured out that it is just noise at this juncture. to this question earlier, it reminds us of august we had a downgrade. president obama, his constituents said the same thing. the market went up, the bond market went up

it does not -- it does not qualify as an accident of birth, immutability in that -- in that sense. again, the plaintiffs -- >> so you -- so what -- i don't quite understand it. if you're not dealing with this as a class question, then why would you say that the government is not free to discriminate against them? >> well, your honor, i would think that -- i think it's a -- it's a very different question whether or not the government can proceed arbitrarily and irrationally with respect to any group of people, regardless of whether or not they qualify under this court's traditional test for suspectedness. and the hypothetical i understood you to be offering, i would submit would create -- would -- unless there's something that is not occurring to me immediately, an arbitrary and capricious distinction among similarly situated individuals, that is not what we think is at the -- at the root of the traditional definition of marriage. >> mr. cooper, could i just understand your argument. in reading the briefs, it seems as though your principal argument is that same-sex and opposite -- o

week get that passed next and see what the senate does. we are used to them not doing anything, but we are not waiting until march 27 to work on this. we want to get ahead of it. there is no thought of closing down the government. we have enough problems without getting into that. >> you have been raising concerns about these cuts ever since they were created. there are some republicans in the last week or so that have indicated that they would be ok with these cuts, at least for the time being. would you say there has been a real change on your side of the aisle? >> i fought sequestration. i fought the $487 billion. but that is done. we accept that. the chiefs said they could live with that. they have had to change the strategy they have had since world war ii. they will not be able to protect us in two different places around the world. we look at korea aand iran. we pulled back. that has already been implemented. the sequestration gives them no flexibility. it just cuts every department an equal percentage. it is a crazy way to do thing

that does nothing, -- does not as i said at the outset seem likely. >> not feasible today, but once obamacareoes into effect it could be that those the observable as well a the possible rationing of health care could create such an outcry that this program would be watered down substantially. lou: do you agree? >> exactly. i think he is right. i don't think it wille overturned. even though it is going to be difficult to implement, now we already know, there is a 15 page thing that peoe have to fill out just to get started in registering for obamacare. it can be watered down. it better work or it isn't going to be around totally, that's for sure. he not point to good. >> that much of it. lou: you were about to say very quickly. >> we don't want to overlook the fact that the problems facing the budget and the major uncertainty facing the u.s. economy's over the next two years, growing by more than 3% annually. we are going to be depending upon the working age population that is going to be growing. one-half of 1% annually to fund this unprecedented retirement of huge numbers of baby boomers. lo

does he therefore share my concern as expressed by the torrents alliance changes to the does are likelyhis press the number of visitors coming particularly from brazil? what we did to ensure the border agency does not become a gross suppressant to the uk? >> i'm happy to say to my friend of the national security council met recently to consider some of these border issues. and has decided not to put the pieces onto brazilian national. we wt to wecome the brazilians to make sure we enhance border security. but actually in defense of the home office, the time spent in terms of processing visas has been great improvement there, and we're looking at a number of steps to make sure we attract tourists from the fastest-growing markets, including china and elsewhere. >> thank you, mr. speaker. does the pre minister except that families face a triple whammy in childcare, costs are going up, the average family has lost over 1500 pounds a year in support? therefore does he also except that he may he made announce next week to help with the cost of childcare will be small remedy to a crises of his

fundamentally it's created a process for those documents where one does not exist. i will agree the website of the planning department is not user friendly and that needs to change. regardless of whether or not we're talking about c-e-q-a form, that does need to change. you have to go under the e-i-r section and then look under the categorical exemption, then i do think we should make it more obvious and i think that that's something, i know that our communications team is working on. at this point one of the big issues that seems to be discussed is the first approval versus the last approval. that seems to be the major source of contention between those people supporting supervisor wiener's legislation and those people who do not. in terms of the community planning exemption, i did have a question for the supervisor. projects that would be under the community plan exemption, in this process when would the appeal period begin for that? that's one thing i think would be useful to worry about because i think that's the one area where larger projects would be impacted.

does anyone you know who does not work in a government union have one? no, nobody has this other than state, federal and local unionized employees whose benefits, i'm not attacking anyone, good for them, it must be nice, but this is so far out of the mainstream. republicans can just say look, let's have an even playing feel, there is no -- field, there is no reason that a person with public sector job can have a lifetime healthcare and dental care system. neil: they could make a move to 401(k) type plans, grandfather them in, even with new workers but even that gets rejected by unions. i cannot imagine giving the choice of commenting to a new program like that for new workers, or seeing those other benefits wiped out. >> this is -- this is the very core of the democratic base. our government workers, and not just federal workers, in washington that our focus, but in the states, this is how democrats get elected, so it is a quid pro quo, you can't blame the unions for getting all they can, you can blame politicians for giving it to them, look at them side

i think roger does what he does. everybody else does what they do and altogether i think that it creates a beautiful symphony of different voices that give you an idea of what's going on in the world. >> zev chafets, thanks for joining us. >>> that's not media bias, that's the gop own autopsy. was the press right all along? u. to prove it, we set up our call center right here... [ chirp ] all good? [ chirp ] getty up. call me! seriously, this is really happening! [ cellphone rings ] hello? it's a giant helicopter ma'am. [ male announcer ] get it done [ chirp ] with the ultra-rugged kyocera torque, only from sprint direct connect. buy one get four free for your business. only from sprint direct connect. if youthen this willbrids arbe a nice surprise. meet the 5-passenger ford c-max hybrid. c-max come. c-max go. c-max give a ride to everyone it knows. c max has more passenger volume than competitor prius v and we haven't even mentioned... c-max also gets better mpg. say hi to the super fuel efficient ford c-maxybrid. w

she's got a proposal. >> does she give him a bottle of scotch? >> she's asking in her own >>> i think once you get to a certain age, you stop caring about things like danger. venomous snakes, whatever. here we are in australia. an eastern australian brown snake made its way up here to the picnic area. it's hard to see at first. it's around where the birds are. a side note, an eastern australia brown snake is the number one most dangerous snake in australia. highly dangerous. bad temper, responsible for more deaths in australia than any other snake. a guy's got to go to the bathroom. when a man's got to go, a man's got to go. is this a joke? >> no way. he kicked it twice. >> he kicks it once to get it out of the path and it coils up looking like it's going to attack him. when it attacks, he boots it in the face. eventually, the snake is like, i think i've met my match and starts slithering away. he goes to the men's room, no big deal. >> he was going to protect his prostate. >> at first, he tries to move it out of the way like it's a cigarette but

>> does that say it does will point to what case? heristory and tradition, 200 years, they will make some point. when it was adopted in 1868, no one thought that the phrase involved and gays and lesbians. it was about slavery. this has been understood. that is basically the argument. never came upt before. i think i am not alone in saying it is anthony kennedy, justice the libertarian conservative, on the conservative side of a lot of issues. and things that involve liberty, he has banned on the liberal side in the past. the issue here, justice kennedy wants to rule in a big way or a narrow way to strike down proposition 8? the presumption is that they will join with him. everyone will have their eye on justice kennedy. everybody says over 20 years, it is amazing how the polls have changed. if you are in the supreme court , you move out and say that the country is changing and we should recognize this or that we ought to stand back 10 years from now. if 42 states authorize gay marriage and eight didn't, it would be easy for the supre

in addition to that, if it does not get worked out, this disclosure item is going to last until it does get worked out. so that is the first thing. i also want you to be aware that they have been selling tickets to shows and canceling those tickets day of or the day prior. so let's talk about their patrons, their patrons are purchasing tickets to shows, they are taking in the money, and they are canceling the shows and not refunding the money and moving those shows. >> you don't know that. how do you know that? >> i have gone on-line and there is still selling tickets to stuff. >> even with this issue. >> okay. >> sorry >> thank you. >> no. you are not the public. >> you cannot make a public comment. >> seeing none, public comment is closed. >> commissioners, i feel like this is a really testing our ability to mediate for all sides. and that what we do here tonight, is going to be significant. with regard to whether they sell tickets or whether they refund tickets, that has more to do with the police fraud unit than us. so that is not within our jurisdiction. and so, we cannot consider

it does not work like that. [indiscernible conversation] [crowd noises] [indiscernible conversation] gets a little heavy after a while. [indiscernible conversation] [crowd noises] >> where are you all from? >> philadelphia. >> sorry. [indiscernible conversation] you have no idea how hard it is to find a rainbow glitter at a cbs or the night before -- at a cvs the night before. [indiscernible conversation] >> live pictures outside the supreme court today as the court takes up a second of two same- sex marriage cases this week. the crowds appeared to be smaller today than yesterday when the nine justices debated the california proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage. today, the court is hearing or argument on the defense of marriage act or doma, the fighting marriage between a man and woman. theoretically, the court is about 20 minutes into the proceedings. we think it will last about two hours. our plan is to continue bringing you scenes from around the supreme court and the oral argument from today as soon as it