technically goes into the pension benefit guaranty corp. just like the money that goes into social security and everything else. but the revenue, the important part, went to highways, 14 years, to build two years' worth of highways. i don't think that is the kind of budget and that we want to do. i wanted to reinstitute the pay-go where the revenues have to match up with these vintage we are making. still out years, you don't have to match up, but in the first year, we ought to lease seven offset that takes care of the first year's worth of expenditures. that is all that this does. it is just a good accounting principle that we ought to have when talking about revenues. we cannot spend money we are not going to get 14 years. really don't agree with what is in the budget amendment after the first year anyway. so we are kind of lying about how we are going to pay for different things, and just adding it to the deficit rather than actually doing it. >> is there further debate? >> madam chair, senator enzi is reinstating the first year pay- pro