they don't like tolstoy's so what redoing using be imperial terms? also used by a national chauvinist and french fascist talks about the anti-french conspiracy of those who will undermine france and why in other countries as the imperialists and it is exclusive. to suggest if you criticize aspects of society your government policy, not so much i may disagree but they say you are against your own country you are beyond the pale of the discussion is the exclusive concept that doesn't give access to the critiques essential to make a more perfect union that is why the founding generation has the right to criticize the amendment is among the first rookie more american but i found over 200 years critics have worked hard with the loyalty is anti-americanism with the war of 1812 and mexico and the rise of the empire and across the 20th century it is the constructive turn the does that do justice. >>host: also another book not sees and good neighbors would is the topic? >> a little known episode from the second world war when the roosevelt and administration

you can read all about in the tolstoy. so the drama erupts again in 1991 with the collapse of the soviet union and the chechen separatist movement breaks out and it becomes a matter of violence and the yeltsin government puts down violently the first chechen war. then in '99 there's another chechen war. the chechens are defeated again. and those combatants did one of two things: either they -- in their exhaustion went over to the russian side or they dispersed into dagestan which is right near them and kind of took for the hills, as it were. and the ideology changed. it was no longer a matter of chechen separatism, it was a matter of global jihad. it's a very -- it's a very difficult thing to suss out. so when the dagestanny radicals said they have no interest in u.s. targets, it's hard to figure out what they mean at this point. >> rose: any evidence of any training anywhere? >> well, it was said that the family's father had given them some military training but i don't see any evidence of this yet and that might have bee

tipton's bill reminds me of tolstoy's observation when he said, i sit on a man's back, check choking him and making him carry me, all the while i assure him and anyone who will listen that i'm sympathetic for his plight and willing to do everything i can to help. except by getting off his back. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman from california yields back. any other member wish to speak to the amendment? the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlelady from california. so many as are in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. the noes have it. the amendment is not agreed to. the gentlelady from california. mrs. napolitano: i'd like a recorded vote. the chair: pursuant to clause 6 of rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlelady from california will be postponed. are there further amendments? for what purpose does the gentlelady from -- gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> i have an amendment at the desk. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 2 printed in