steve vettle on behalf of [speaker not understood] and live nation. couple of points to make. first of all, live entertainment at pier 27-29 has been planned since the inception of the america's cup project. both the board of supervisors and the port commission approved construction and operation of the pavilion in 2012 when they approved the america's cup project. the main argument seems to be the e-i-r conservatively found noise associated with amplified music and traffic impacts as a whole could be significant even after implementation of mitigation measures. but the city has implicitly made findings set forth in the police code that require rejection of the place of entertainment permit. appellants could be tend the commission had no choice but to deny the permit. but appellants are doing is confusing two different standards. ~ contend the standard of citi qua significance is different than the standard under the police code. ~ c-e-q-a there is nothing in the police code that indicates the entertainment commission can impliedly make findings. just the contrary is true unde

. >>> thank you, steve vettle. i don't have anything more to add. i just wanted to go over the additional conditions the steering committee, the america's cup authority and us are asking that you impose on this permit. they're in exhibit 3 of our brief. the four conditions, number one, parking and traffic, live nation will make america's cup will make best efforts to work with city agencies which as you've heard has been happening. to produce a neighborhood traffic and parking plan. review and input by the week of april 15th. that has already occurred. second, curfews, live nation and america's cup agree to no more than 8 shows monday through thursday with music until 10:30 p.m. and the balance would end at 10:00 p.m. number 3, i think this was important to many of you. that live nation will remove all site improvements and repair any damage to the site by october 31st, 2013. the port plans include a public park available for public review. live nation further agrees not to make the existing 9200 capacity venue permanent. nor will live nation apply

steve vettle. i represent an individual named dave o'keefe who has a hotel project that was approved at 144 king street in 2005. put this on the overhead. it's not great graphic, but it can show you the location -- >> can you put that down? thanks. >>> the hotel site is right across on the ballpark, the site of a one-story building. what was approved in 2005 was a 140-room hotel. this commission then extended those permits in 2011. the problem that we're facing and the reason that we are working with the staff and the rezoning or this text amendment is that under the old m2 zoning under which this project was approved, there was no limit to the size of hotels, but there was a severe limit to the floor area ratio. it was only 5 to 1. and, so, the direction to my client was go find qdrs from historic buildings to add to the far on the site. she was never able to do so. the prior developer passed away and my client acquired this site. none of them were ever able to find pdrs to add to the far on the s