her dignity was undermind by having a compete in a system which race has some kind of value even though she might not have gotten in. so the court has moved in a direction to allow white plaintiffs to make arguments even though they can't show in a reverse discrimination case. one might have thought this could have been the case if they were to get any swing voters saying there is a difference between having a race conscious program and any individual being able to claim race discrimination. and they weren't able to do that. i think in the next generation of cases what might be most optimal for the liberals is first of all, a case where the university or other entity has done the same kind of thorough investigation of the need for diversity. and the university of texas did a pretty good job. but also showing they tried race neutral alternatives and they don't provide the substantial amount of diversity that is necessary. they are going to have to jump through some evidentiary hoops to show we can't get there without race. >> there is another thing that the left wing of the court might h

when democracy is undermind in the countries, we should be very much aware that they are creating a major geopolitical problem because we have not talking about an internal issue where the country became totalitarian, but it's revolutionary, anti-american, and also have connections with a number of enemies or enemies of all in general. the democracy here is equal to the political threat. the more dictators like this are being elected, less and less accountable to society or less accountable to the power, that means the more they accumulate power and more free to make decisions and some of the decisions are not good. therefore, as i said, i repeat, democracy, the lack of democracy, the countries is a geopolitical threat by the definition. i talked about the groups i talked about before like the marginal groups that existed there. if the revolution tried to reach to these groups, today, we have many, many groups in chile and brazil in particular that actually see chavez as a symbol of revolution, and liberation, as a symbol of anti-americanism. it's not clear to what extent they succeeded i

. >> you undermind the whole argument by mentioning vcr's. >> oh well. i dated myself. wow. >> does anybody still have a vcr? >> i do. >> it is not plugged in though. it is sitting there like having a corpse in your apartment without the stench. i walk in every day and there is the vcr in that stupid entertainment center. why do people have an entertainment center? you walk in and it sits there and it has all of your crap and it says look at me. i entertain. it is stupid. >> the bigger they were the cooler they were. >> now every entertainment center you see is in cops. there is a guy wrestling somebody. >> with no shirt on. >> why were the boxes for porn so much bigger than the regular vcr boxes? wouldn't you want to hide that? >> i have no idea. every tangent you has brought to the story has been pointless. >> call of duty. >> the half of a burrito i had before the show. i never should eat from the garbage. and what is a night of a thousand judies and why is bill schulz attending wearing ruby red slippers? i hope you are happy. >>> are we the only show to go over the

these failures have undermind the public's trust's irs ability to administer the fax laws in a fair andmpartial manner. they must be corrected. >> the new acting commissioner says primary mission will be to restore that trust. one lawmaker told him i don't know whether to admire you or pity you. mike emanuel on fox top story tonight on capitol hill. lots of lawmakers want to know who is to blame for the targeting. >> no question about it, shep. lawmakers tried to get at that point, you know, who started all of this. and ultimately, who is responsible? >> so no one would acknowledge who gave the directive to do that. >> that's correct. during the audit phase of this. >> mr.er with werful fell, are you satisfied with that. >> we will i couldn't know cover every fact. >> members seemed to welcome the get to the bottom attitude. werfel has only been on the job less than two weeks, shep. >> two questions about irs officials still getting paychecks. >> well, that's right. you remember the woman who came up here to capitol hill, started to defend herself and then refused to answer questions. w

the british ruling class will give in to islamism, to the attempt to take over, to the attempt to undermind britain and encroachment of the values in britain, and the class was saying let's go along with this. that's why i wrote, but in the book, i was extremely careful about, i think we must be to acknowledge them, there are many, many muslims who find this equally frightening and worrying and have nothing to do with it. >> host: were you branded a racest after the book came out? grg i don't think i was branded a racist, because, of course, that is a particularly ignorant thing to say because islam is not a race, but a religion. i find it hard to see, you know, if onements to append a negative end tat, it's not the word it use, but people found ways to be rude. there's no shortage of the creative imagination coming to the dispensing of insults in this territory, i'm afraid. >> host: in the book, you talk about multiculturism quite a bit. did it affect your view on british society and british politicians? >> guest: multiculturism is one of the most misunderstood and one of the most pernicio

the military such that their authority to make these classifications that should not be undually undermind? >> that is a difficult question to answer. the process is inside the military, and even if you engage leet health to get the discharge upgraded, there's little experience outside groups like service members legal defense network who are having a lot of experience in working with that. there's little experience of getting civilian lawyers to work with a process inside the military. my recommendation is that you would remove that process from the military and put it outside of the military where average citizens and attorneys would have much more access to the process. >> can i add to that, ma'am? >> please. >> if i may, from a personal note, even coming out the military and then coming, trying to apply for a benefit, a disability benefit, i was denied three times. once i had other employment, i was able to access insurance of my own where i was able to go through another doctor, and that doctor was able to produce that evidence and i could grant appeal with the attorneys, and now i wa