out front tonight, stephanie mill, adeena bedela and michael medved. we reported last night, sergeant murphy decided to release the pictures on his own, so upset by the cover of "rolling stone," he said this man is evil and i want people to see the real face of terror and put out the pictures. you praised boston magazine yesterday for putting these pictures up. should murphy be punished for doing something without the approval of the police department, of federal authorities or is he a hero? >> well, you know, erin, sometimes more than one thing can be true at a time. and i think he's a hero, particularly if you're the parents of the 8-year-old boy that got blown up or one of the other people that died or one of the people that were horribly maimed and felt the same way i did when i saw "rolling stone," like, my god, am i back in the '70s trying to choose between donny osmond or greg brady or leif garrett. the photo glamorized him and that's why there was a reaction to it. if you're boston pd, you would have a pretty emotional reaction to it and go, no

it has massive amounts of content in the communications not the medved data. he talks about the jones case which is a tracking device put on a particular individual. they're falling around tracking a particular individual. until the specific numbers and into the database and the targeting of the 702 order is only focused on the non-u.s. persons believed to be outside of the u.s.. it is a case involving a primitive device and focused on individual. and it's been applied by the lower courts more broadly and also the fact of this focused on an individual there is more constitutionally significant than the general collection of the data. i want to talk for just a minute about some of the comments that judge robertson made about secrecy and the rise to the secret law and also the room of the court and programmatic orders etc.. it's important to understand the constitutional background. the surveillance for the foreign intelligence purposes is conducted by the president without court approval and the courts have consistently said the president has the authority with

outfront tonight, cornell belcher, our legal analyst paul callan and michael medved.h us. cornell, you just heard attorney general eric holder personalize this story with that story about his son. makes it something that we can all connect to and understand hopefully a little bit. is this a case where the attorney general should transfer that personal story into a charge? >> well, i think it's tough. i mean i think the attorney general and the president to a certain extent are in tough places. i think it is important that for the first time i think where i can imagine -- can remember that the attorney general talking about the law in a very sort of personal way. but i think it's tough to transfer that to we should now sort of prosecute or we should bring a case. i mean he's still got to go through the investigation, which they apparently do, but i know there's a lot of pressure on the white house and a lot of pressure on the attorney general to bring a case because people are hurting and they want an avenue for their hurt. but i've got a feeling that in the end they'r

what's the one of the politics it's really interesting you run down the roll call vote from their boss medved trying to find another roll call that looks like that you basically had progressive joining with tea partiers you had. members within their party breaking from leadership who would have thought when the tea party your tea partiers like justin amash came to power in two thousand and ten with that whole tea party revolution that three years later we'd be dipping progressives would be depending on them to help pass legislation so that's that's kind of what's happening here and i think this is going to be an alliance that's going to stick together and it's not just on surveillance this is also when when the president was being confirmed through a head of the cia and the drone memo started coming out you stole all the outrage over that you sold these same sort of progressive democrats libertarian republicans joining together to do stuff about that this will continue in just because this vote. went down it only went down by twelve votes at seven republicans or seven democrats which it would

i didn't believe that medved agreed to that. >> stephanie: yeah, a worm hole opened up in the universenk it is breaking the public truth even. he did the same thing again after telling the public that he was, you know, not doing it anymore and was reformed and all of that. don't you think -- i mean -- it looks like the latest polling that's what is happening. >> that is where it goes beyond being between him and his wife or family and us is when you can't trust the guy. it's like he's almost sociopathic. he really has some problems between right and wrong on this issue. i love when he said i apologize to anyone who may have received this like he is spamming pictures of his weaner all over the world. >> stephanie: yeah, you are right. that's really incriminate. >> stephanie: yeah he is in a lot of in-boxes. what do you think there was a quinnipiac poll that showed him still ahead. >> i live in new york city. i think the ones that are still supporting him now will probably stay with him until the end. christine quinn is going to win the primary, but she is not going to get to the point o

i mitt michael medved's show and he went on about how anthony weiner wasn't fit for the job because heloud in the car and i'm screaming at the radio like have you completely forgotten he set up another woman in a house and donna hanover had to have a press conference to reveal that they had been together for like a year and then we had 9-11 and everything changed. that whole thing just kind of went away. and nobody cared. >> stephanie: you remember 9-11, he tule got the apartment for bernie carrick so he should cheat on his mistresses with another mistress at the apartment that was supposed to be for 9-11 rescue workers. mayor moral values. i remember him. >> he's despicable in my opinion. >> you're despicable! >> stephanie: 29 minutes after the hour. right back on "the stephanie miller show." young turks! i think the number 1 thing than viewers like about the young turks is that were honest. they know that i'm not bsing them for some hidden agenda, actually supporting one party or the other. when the democrats are wrong, they know i'm going to be the first one to call them out. cenk o

i did once debate michael medved.nderstand what you're saying unless you can see your lip. whole thing is far too confusing. >> stephanie: a state department spokeswoman said as in all of the communications, we have advised the governor of venezuela of the felony charges against him and urge he should not be allowed to proceed to further international travel other than what is necessary to return him to the united states. we simply feel any country granting asylum to mr. snowden would create great difficulties in our bilateral relationship, yada yada. >> your thoughts on snowden and the nsa and all of that. >> hal: that's a huge door to open. i think there is a difference between whistle-blowers and leakers. the unfortunate part of the snowden case is he's effectively both. that's where he's created a murky world for himself. it is one thing like the pentagon papers -- >> stephanie: i was going to say ellsberg wrote a case about why snowden made a right decision. >> he was working with the documentary filmmaker and wi