mr. harvey rose and many of you for your help on this. we want to start off by reviewing some highlights on what's happening in terms of our mission and the success we're having through our 28 library libraries. we served over 7.2 million visitors ~ and have circulated 11 million items annually. the user trends speak to the fact we have one of the highest visits per capita and circulation rates per capita among urban librarieses. that is something to be proud of. it's attributed to the support we have from our community. in terms of youth engagement, we continue to do well in terms of library program attendance. just as an example, 250,000 children and teens attended programs this past year. strong emphasis on learning and i'll speak more at length about that, but over 2.9 million items, both printed and multi-media, are available in 15 languages. in terms of technology access, just to highlight very quickly, we have more than half a million hours of public access to our computers which really speaks to the issue of digital inclusion. we'

mr. chair. i will be brief. i made a proposal to honor the legacy of harvey. in the process of putting that together i've may be seated with stakeholders with a dive group of folks rep many communities. including the individuals in the business communities. i see mr. lazarus here. one thing is that everyone agree we as a city should honor harvey milk but how this revised proposal came about. one that we want to honor harvey milk but in a way of bringing people together. and because of that we wanted to put together a proposal that only allows the city to recognize the legacy of harvey milk but honoring the legacies of other folks from other xhundz u communities. so this legislation strikes a balance by creating the airport advisory committee. it's a committee that would make a recommendation to the san francisco board of supervisors which under the charter has the final say on what happens at the airport. what the ordinance does it sort of makes it clear we want to honor harvey milk by naming a terminal at the airport by not which terminal so the committee make

mr. steve harvey. >> you and i go way back.lot of people don't know is that you also have a heart for our will the of what's going on in the country. you don't give an opinion, but you open up the air waves, even as we watch the trayvon martin case. when we were trying to say it should go to trial, you had us come on and say that. you're watching all this. i just thought people ought to know that about you. >> yeah and, you know, i do have an opinion about it. but i'm not a lawyer. i do respect and love the fact that our country has a system to address things, but i break it down to the smallest common denominator. i just happen to be a father. if you take color away from the whole situation -- let's remove race from the situation. how would you like it if your child went to the store on a commercial break to get an ice tea and a pack of candy and somebody killed him? i don't know what -- i don't care what the circumstance is, there was no reason for this young boy to die. there was no reason for him to be killed that day. he d

mr. president, and to supervisor tang. i think chief it was wise of you to befriended harvey rose. i think it's no surprise we've had our sdaurms. the first one was the undocumented policy and one of the things i appreciated that notwithstanding the difference of opinion i always felt we could be having an honest discussion. i appreciate the fact even if you discharged you sat down and worked is out with the folks and once that issue was revolved we moved forward. this is a great sign of character first year i appreciate your commitment to youth to young people. and i wish you the very best. i know it's been hard for you to be no san francisco but this city thanks you and as the district supervisor i'm appreciative >> i'd like to knowledge supervisor avalos. >> chief thank you for your great service when you came here 8 years ago. there were a lot of people who had high hopes and you achieved much. we had at least 1 hundred and 50 at times by the policies you put in place you came with our experience from chicago were able to help us consistently and thank you for that. thank you f

on that point, let abring in harvey peter, former chairman of the s.e.c. mr.think there's any merit -- >> legitimate effort on the part of the s.e.c. to hold hedge fund managers accountable for the conduct of their traders and portfolio managers. >> in terms of those portfolio managers, the two that are in question, i believe that both of the cases are still open. so what happens if they're found not guilty? >> well, if he's found not guilty, that will potentially weaken the s.e.c.'s case, but it won't eviscerate it. the reason for that is they may not have proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas in an administrative proceeding, it's only a preponderance of the evidence. >> harvey, if i may interrupt, it's ron insana, in respect to the open cases, and what we read about martoma, how does the s.e.c. launch a complaint against a supervisor when, in fact, there's been no proof of wrongdoing among the portfolio managers, as mandy asked in question, what's the procedural effort here as those trials go on? how do they press steve to stop managing other p

harvey. you know me. you know i don't cause no ruckus. >> you complied and laid on the ground. mr.liams kept on trying to fight. and like i do with everybody in here, your first offense for fighting's gonna be 10 days. >> oh, man. come on, man. i mean, come on, hale. i comply with everything the officers have asked me to do. i've been in here. i ain't been kicking on no doors. i ain't been causing no ruckus or nothing. >> sign right there and right there. >> [ sighs ] that's just bull[bleep] man. lose all the way around. lose my money, lose my commissary, and lose my privileges. >> you want to sign that? >> that don't even make sense, man. you know me. collins, that don't even make sense. i lose all the way around? >> all right, let me explain something to you real quick, all right? i ain't got nothing to do with this, but i'm just witnessing this. however [clears throat] you know what this started from. >> dude's trying to steal my [bleep] >> what's it originally started from? it started from putting money on an account illegally. >> i ain't know nothing about that was illegal. >>

harvey oswald shot the president on november 22, 1963. at 8:30 p.m., a historian gives booktv a preview of his forthcoming book, mr. president. george washington and the making of the nation's highest office. then at 8:45 p.m. eastern, the first amendment cases the author has participated in or written about over the years. he also discusses his fight for freedom. and then "after words" with an author and guest interviewer. she is the author of women in the club, gender and policymaking in the senate. we wrap up tonight's program at 11:00 p.m. eastern with a discussion on how economic balance has brought down powerful nations. glenn hubbard and the hudson institute talk about the possibility of the same thing happening to the united states. visit booktv.org for more on this television schedule. >> now it's time for more booktv. the author is the daughter of two holocaust survivors. sonia taitz was featured at the authors wrote literature fest. >> i am so honored to be here with this great audience and the author sonia taitz, who has written a very haunting book called "the watchmaker's daughter." you are the daughter, tell us

mr. butler i didn't mean to be a hero. >> everything that you are and everything that you have is a butler. >> and we welcome harvey weinstein and welcome to all the lawyers. we know how important this is given how many people are here. let's start with you, harvey. warner brothers say they own the rights to the title "the butler." they reregistered it as recently as 2010. why are they wrong? >> it's not that they're wrong, but it would have just said this is a movie about civil rights. 28 financiers financed the movie. and titles have been used and repeated. our understanding with them was this was just going to be a simple process. sandra bullock and mccarthy have a movie out called heat. and ten years before that bert reynolds made a movie called heat. these guys told us they were going to do the normal business day practice. i think there was an ulterior motive. >> chris, what went into that decision that they couldn't use the title? what was the consideration that went into that decision? >> it's almost 100 years it's called the title registration bureau. it was established in 1925 to set up a mechanism for easy dispute

harvey weinstein on cnn last year. >> if i were to make a movie about your life, who would you want to play you, mr. president?trust your judgment more than mine on that. >> brad pitt, george clooney? >> pretty good-looking, but you could pull bulbous things on his nose. >> and hillary? who would you play hillary in this movie? >> meryl streep? >> very challenging project for any actor or actress to play this larcher than life personality. >> reporter: there are of course any number of potential problems in producing a film about a character who in real life may be trying to cast herself as commander in chief. conservatives are suspicious this will be a puff piece, one that ultimately observes. nbc insists it will be even-handed when it comes to dealing with clippen and her work. >>> we should also know that cnn films is planning a documentary project by academy award winning producer charles ferguson, and since it's a documentary, the role will be played by hillary clinton. jake tapper, cnn, washington. >>> okay. some things the clintons are reportedly running from, that would be the anthony weiner sexting sc