bohey with office of community investment infrastructure. the mission bay owner participation agreements provide those definitions that ms. riley gave to the board. for other development projects and deals, for example, in the hunters point candlestick development, there is a housing ladder that is much broader because it includes both the public housing rebuild under hub sf all the way to working families all the way up to really the 120 to 160, which is not typically built in san francisco, but that was a required subsidy of that particular development. so -- >> and we don't have the flexibility at this point in this project to make those kinds of changes? >> no. as ms. riley describes, on average, 60 and below, but really the reality is because of the direct access to housing, the lost units that the board recently approved throughout mission bay, transbay, we're able to get that on average at 60 even in mission bay, significantly lower. >> okay, thank you. i thank you for that information. i brought up these points mostly because one of my biggest concerns, of course, is affordability and i do know that we are in this