this is not what this is as chris says in this to her somehow we have to look at mr list as a family attorney after i mean the only senator that muck of this is how i look up to is this. we saw him in almost every month but. this is this it was worthwhile it did come to light it's dumb but is this is because you would markets is good when you do this and what's a democrat. to tell it and then profit it to come back to that have to feed lots of it and then we don't have good markets. we apprehended the government to stop imports and advice from from abroad when to stop and. well as now for pulling in that were like it's like. according to the regulations we come overstretched the import of certain items in the country but even that the regulation that we couldn't restricts them petition all these are goose for must consider competitively the one of the area we don't want to access is also that because the government does not subsidize and often wish to do so at the higher costs. so they cannot compete would be important who don't know what caused indy also contras so competition will

somehow we have to look at mr list as a family attorney named after me the only senator democrat to this is how i look up to is this. slim in almost every month but. this is this it was worthwhile it did come to light it's dumb but is that is because you would markets is good when you do this and what's a democrat bill but that's for you to tell it and the profits to come back to the have to feed lots of and then we don't have good markets. we apprehended the government to stop imports and advice from from abroad when to stop and. well as now for pulling in that we were lucky it's one of. the. according to the regulations we come over stretched the import of certain items in the country but even then the regulation that we couldn't restricts them petition all these are goose foremost concern competently they're one of the area we don't get access it's also that because the government is not subsidizing our foremost boost at the higher costs so they cannot compete would be important. at the low what. also contras so competition will be on the home front if imus even to it the government s

i do not see 4181 appearing on this list. >> thank you. mr. sanchez? thank you, scott sanchez planning department. i want to clarify that i did look to the property of the west there are several permits for horizontal expansion from the late 90s. there are dates from the late 90s and early 2,000 and on the planning code, private views are not protected. so just want to address those 2 points. i do not have a copy of the mailing list in front of me. i heard the neighbors say that doug view confirmed that her name was on it and she should have received it. she may want to clarify that and if there are some issue with the postal office. i would also note there is a poster on the property as well, a bright orange poster that goes on to indicate the 30-day appeal for the notice window. >> the expansion to the building on the west is that a single story >> it's my understanding that it's a single story. >> thank you, commissioners, the matter is submitted. >> commissioner fung to clarify, our notices are identical to 311 and that does show under our list. >>

mr. brown, come on. >> look, i'm the negotiator. see, i'm the negotiator. >> what'd they say? >> uh, well, let me get the list. >> hurry up, mr. brown, please! >> i got he latest from the faculty. here it is right here. >> okay, what does it say? >> okay, it says right here, run! get out, everybody! >> mr. brown, this is serious. >> well, i'm trying to help get this thing over with. okay, what they said was there's pizza and juice for everybody that'll give up right now 'cause i know you're hungry. i know you're hungry. i know somebody here is hungry. >> man, look, tell 'em that they can't bribe us with food, right? >> [ laughs ] >> man, the revolution does not include pizza. >> well, maybe now they'll compromise since you done let go of one of your hostages. >> man, little biggie wasn't a hostage. little biggie was a traitor. we ain't got no hostages. >> you ain't got no hostages? >> no. >> no revolution song? no slogans or nothing? >> no. >> you're wack! if it was left up to y'all, we'd still be marching for our freedom. >> hey, look, these are the concessions that we're willing to make. >> what the what? why did you write t

mr. marsalis had kept a list of names on his computer. yearly calendar of women. >> and how this woman's secret weapon would finally stop the cross country con man. >> if i'm such a god awful person, why do you keep on hanging out for me? >> would you be taken in by the imposter? >> who are you? >> here now, david muir and elizabeth vargas. >> good evening. he looked great on paper and his photos weren't bad, either. good enough to have a lot of women cheque out his match.com dating profile. but it's what happened afterward that turned those dream dates into nightmares. >> in fact, it's the big question everyone at home will be asking themselves, especially if you have gone online looking for love. how could more than 20 smart, sophisticated women be fooled by the same charming imposter who called himself dr. jeff? he was hardly a doctor, and as they would painfully learn, he was something else. >> i love being a lawyer so much, you know, the cases, it's always different. >> reporter: jessika rovell has an impressive resume. she's an atto

mr. clerk can you call item 16 and 17 together. >> item 16 appropriating the amount listed for refunding certificate of participation. number 17 resolution for refunding certificate of participation and capital projects in one or more series in the aggregate amount not to exceed amount listed. >> thank you. we have someone here to speak on these items. >> good morning. nadia [inaudible]. we're here before you today to ask for authorization to ask one or more series of refunding certificates to pay down four of the certificate of participation that are outstanding and before you. those include 2001 series [inaudible] 2003 serious for the house improvement and 2004 series for the juvenile hall as well as 2007 series of acquisition of van ness property. we are approving a threshold of savings of 3%, so we ask that you give us the authority to do the series and some of them identified here (inaudible) potentially refunded as soon as the board approves it. the 2007 series is not in callable right now but will be next year but this authority allows the flexibility for the office of public fina

estimated seventy four thousand in family here's some of the other benefits mr cameron is claiming is well. simple are immense lists of these in the anti fracking campaign and and his the reasons now according to the way system ations five hundred years worth of gas supply is lying beneath britain right now so how we shall get such xstrata that want to have and so the process of fracking involves drilling a hole deep into the dense shell rocks that contain contain the natural gas and pumping in a very high pressure of vast quantities of of water mixed with sand in chemicals this opens up these tiny fishes in the wrong now through which the trapped gas can that escape it bubbles out and is captured and brings it all the way to the surface and then and then its point town now i asked chris we senior partner with advisory whether fracking is the way forward for britain now is to what it back to have an overall economy of course is very much in the question if the u.k. can develop the resourced standards to optimist or notes. no question about it with considerably your energy basically energy cost to destry a boost to

mr. teeg states when these letters are issued, they are listed on our website but not failed out to neighbors. so, at that point, it begame incumbent on mr. ringel to check the planning department website which he never did. he had more than two weeks to do that. the letter was not issued until june 4, so he had five days plus another 15 for the appeal period. he had 20 days to check the planning department website and he failed to do so, so essentially he's saying to you, well, i asked a question, they told me to look at the website and i didn't bother, so can i please have an opportunity to ignore the appeal period. i think if we don't respect these limits on appeals, respect the period, the 15 day period, the appeal period becomes meaningless, you know, we're either going to require the appeals within that time or we're not, especially on a case like this where the speaker, mr. ringel, he did not try to present any excuse that he was out of the country, he was in the hospital, some reason why he couldn't have checked the website for the next 19 days, so i also want to state that mr. ringel

mr. ed." >> he said a whole list of these movies were going -- doing bad this summer and one movie, one hadbout socialism, but you'd think that the whole world was full of socialist movies. this was a five-special. >> i don't think that was the premise. >> what are you talking about? >> the premise was big box office flicks. people are not going. and the next one on the list could be matt damon's movie. >> he said he's going to put you on your medication after the show. back on. back on the meds. >> you know, everybody knows that 95% of hollywood leans to the left. okay, they're completely left. do you think a lot of the people across america realize -- at least half the country is conservative, they see all the lefties out there. they know a lot of the lefties really don't care for conservatives politically, so why give that lefty movie star the business? do you think -- do you think people make that business decision when they try to figure out where to spend their $10 to watch a movie? >> i think they try to shield it, like they said, in an action movie. i think this movie had 100% a pol

listed. the budget analyst recommends approval and i am happy to answer any questions. >> thank you. colleagues any questions? okay. we will move on to the budget analyst report for item nine please. >> mr. chairman, members of committee on page 36 at the bottom what is stated on page 37 and china eastern airlines and scandinavian airlines will pay the amount listed that is less than the permits. we recommend that you approve this resolution. >> okay thank you mr. rose. colleagues any questions comments for mr. rose? okay. we will move on to public comment? seeing none public comment is closed. we have a motion to move this item forward with approval full board. we can do so without opposition. mr. clerk can you call item 10. >> item 10 for leases for airport lease and candy kiosk lcc and lease with marilla chocolate company airport spa with xpresspa san francisco international llc and acknowledge accessories with ilg and llc and airport commission. >> ms. whiner welcome back. >> see what happens when i am not here for a couple of weeks. kathy wagner with the san francisco airport. the airport is looking to amend four leases and marilla chocolate company and pacific gateway expressions

mr. ar men trout, would you mind compiling that list of requests about more information, the gender bias, blah, blah, blah, to commissioner haney so those questions can be addressed and those issues can be addressed and added to the discussion at the rules committee? >> absolutely, commissioner. >> thank you, mr. ar men trout. >> may i ask one more wi sf are we in time to get this on the next rules committee agenda? >> yes, it will be on the 21st, wednesday, august 21st. ~ >> we have two weeks before that agenda. >> thanks, everybody. so, this is now withdrawn. there is no action item. we're not voting on the action item. all right, we are now going to move on. item m, discussion of other educational issues. there are none tonight. item n, consent calendar resolutions removed at a previous meeting for second action. there are none tonight. item o, vote on the consent calendar. yes, roll call, please. >> thank you. mr. logan? >> here. >> aye. >> we're voting on the consent calendar. yes? >> yes. >> thank you so much. thank you. ms. fewer? >> yes. >> mr. haney? >> yes. >> ms. maufas? >> yes

mr. cummings, that the list of search terms submitted to mr. werfel by the majority on this committee includes 81 items? audit?"of the terms " might that generate a lot of paper? >> i'm going to get to that point. let me get through some of the to make sure there is an understanding about the amount of discovery. >> you are losing i think you said 8000 employees. >> we take this very seriously. out of chief counsel's office, we have 100 lawyers working on this. there are now 70,000 pages of documents as of today that will be delivered to congress. these have relevant information that was requested by the committee. you asked for the spreadsheets, we got to them. you asked for the e-mails, we got to them. you asked for training materials, e-mails of self- appearingy witnesses for interviews. all of those were delivered. we are responded to 41 matters from the committee including today's hearing. irs officials including myself have appeared in 15 hearings since the ig report was issued. available employees for a total of 99 interviews. supporting

and then several years later, my husband was looking at a list of silver sent by a mrs. of howe of edinborough based in london, and he spied the same teapot. he knew by the description and the weight of the silver, et cetera, that this was the very teapot which his grandfather had owned, so he bought it back. so it's been in the family for 37 years now. good heavens. what an extraordinary story. well, you've also brought along some documents, and on the front of this antique collector from 1938 is a picture of the teapot, and it also tells us who the maker was. it was by alexander forbes of aberdeen, circa 1730 to 1735. and what you have here is a really, really superb scottish teapot. it's got rococo decoration round the top here and at 1730 to '35, that was very early for rococo decoration, because rococo only came into england in the very late 1720s, so the scots were quick to catch on to this new form of design. everything was asymmetrical and naturalistic. and if we turn it over and have a look at the bottom, we've got the marks here, a.f. for alexander forbes of ab

mr. cummings, that the list of search terms submitted to mr. werfel and irs by this committee includes 81 article? >> that's right. >> is one of the terms audit, the word audit? >> that's right. >> my that generate, i don't know, a lot of paper at irs, mr. cummings? >> yes spent i was going to get that point but let me quickly go to some of the statistics and facts to make sure that there's an understanding of the amount of discovery that is coming across from the irs to these committees speedy's and intertwined in that, your testimony earlier that you're losing, i think he said 8000 employees? 8000. >> we take this very seriously, and out of chief counsel's office of 1600 lawyers with 100 lawyers working on this, 100 people, 70 full-time. i said when a 70,000 pages of doctors as of today by the end of the day today that will be delivered to congress. these are very relevant information on them that were specifically requested by the committees. there was a prioritization. you asked for the bolus budget. we got to do. u.s. for the e-mails. we g

mr. peters requested them, i guess over the last year and a half. and so, the reason that the appeal was filed and those list of 20 questions was presented to the points was because they were being so selective in what they wanted to share. and mr. peters was only doing what he would do as a good property own and her that is the most expensive that he owns and he knows that it is a 98 year old wall and he knows that it has problems and there is we heard the dbi say that there is a 45 degree angle where the load was disbursed and when you have appeared that within 3 inches of the property line. and i guess that the angle is safety. so we, it would make an impact on our, or on the north retaining wall and the second issue is that by law, and they are entitled for the lateral support from mr. peter's property but that is only for the unimproved property but not for any load on the property. and from the improved structure and here they are adding to the improvement. and which is going to add at dishal load to his wall. >> vice president lazarus, and the commissioners bob pelty. the work is at the front of the p

we are a listed company with a normal shareholder. the relationship between the company and mr. a normal relationship between the company and a shareholder. and we believe that we are trying to explain that to the markets, since the listing. so in good time, in bad time, for our shareholder, the company has been managed normally, trying to maximize the value for the shareholders. relevant one, and the private one. so the company is trying to maximize the value for the share holding structure we have including the mention of -- >> there is a lot of focus on the supreme court this week and past issues over tax fraud. do you see that as a fundamental part of the history of the business and you've moved on from here? >> for the company, not certainly. i believe for the person, but certainly not for the company. we hope that the downturn has been finished. that's the real important formation we need to have. as far as -- it is not part of the media company. >> do you think it makes sense for any company to have a perceived political influence as well as a holding in a company? should

mailing list, that is available on our website, there are instructions about how to join and also about how to correct your information, your mailing information, i'm available for any questions. >> mr. sanchez, our decisions are not pres d*ernl, you know that anyway, just to add clarity, this list is if i remember correctly, usually interested parties who have approached it before within that geographical area, is that correct? >> yes, so we would mail conditional use authorizations, so there's the planning code requirements for notice, and you know, it could be a certain distance depending on the type of project it is, but we also mail it to interested neighborhood groups and that information is available on our website, what the groups are, how to add your name, etc., so this -- in this case, since the code doesn't have a requirement for notifying everyone within 150 feet, then the next best thing was to notify those parties, the community groups, again, the 36 groups that expressed interest in this manner or in all matters related to planning. then it's a variety of entities. >> okay, thank you. >> can i ask you a question, mr. sanchez? >> yes. >> what is the reason for someone

list. it's a beautiful restaurants people thought they were crazy to go in there but mr. mcdonald has been a significant owner of this place for a number of years but a silent partner. he is now bringing in a real restaurants into the area. the bar across the street is proven it's ready for a restaurants. a they've hired randy lewis he's a chef and he was voted as one of the top 10 restaurants of the city by the food magazine. they're bringing in the best bartender and has been featured on the tv shows. this is going to be the real deal folks. anderson has been before you. he's a city -- he has a city commissioner job in san francisco and has a very successful promotion company all the partners know what they're doing and we request that this permit this is now if place be added to the new security plan the new business plan and the 3 new partners. if you have any questions we'll be happy >> i do. so let me be perfectly clear you're not coming before us for o a po e but to make a major amendment. your clients have bought the corporation >> no. >> they have bought the liab

. >> i believe these are listed on the wednesday june 6 agenda for next week. if you wish to continue to that date. >> mr. city attorney. >> the committee could act on those today and then they would be removed from the agenda or you could continue it to next week. >> all right. i think it is what it is so let's act on it today so on items six and seven. take them as a joint vote. we need a roll call. >> let's do roll call on those. >> on item six and seven. supervisor mar. >> actually i'm going to vote yes on the lease and no on the fees. >> separate it out. >> item number six. supervisor mar. >> aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> [inaudible] >> avalos no. >> supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> the motion passes. on motion number seven. supervisor mar. >> no. >> supervisor avalos. >> no. >> supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> the motion passs. >> to be clear those are forwarded to the full board for the meeting july 16. >> july 16. >> okay. those motions pass. those items pass. item number eight we hav

list. besides the custodial interference, anything else i can tell the judge about mr. wilkes? before he hit the road in '93, he had a hardware store in flatbush. his wife claimed he had an explosive temper and was physically abusive to her in front of their son. but there is no record ouse. now, i saw a man who seemed to prize discipline. self-control. [phone rings] not counting an occasional murder of a judge. yes? thank you. mr. wilkes has been scheduled for an arraignment this afternoon by judge freeman. finally, a judge who's unafraid. or who doesn't read the papers. mr. carver just wants to see my client locked up. i have no confidence mr. r tria. he has a history of defying judicial authority. he kidnapped his son in violation of court-ordered visitation. i was a very undisciplined man then. i would never allow myself to lose control like that again. ms. casilio, what assets does your client have? none, your honor. no property, no savings. then bail is set for $20,000. your honor-- next up. i said next u judge after your own heart. all we bought is time. fi the son and t

mr. cummings, that the list of search terms submitted to mr. werfel by the majority on this committee includes 81 items? is one of the terms "audit?" might that generate a lot of paper? >> i'm going to get to that point. let me get through some of the statistics to make sure there is an understanding about the amount of discovery. >> you are losing i think you said 8000 employees. >> we take this very seriously. out of chief counsel's office, we have 100 lawyers working on this. there are now 70,000 pages of documents as of today that will be delivered to congress. these have relevant information that was requested by the committee. you asked for the spreadsheets, we got to them. you asked for the e-mails, we got to them. you asked for training materials, e-mails of self- selected by witnesses appearing for interviews. all of those were delivered. we are responded to 41 matters from the committee including today's hearing. irs officials including myself have appeared in 15 hearings since the ig report was issued. we made 19 employees available

do if he had delivered mr snowden out of the united states mr snowden would probably face life imprisonment in the united states so no civil list country can do it or this country of all the respect of. russia there is no reason why the decision of a snowden's asylum should damage relations with the u.s. that's a view shared by london based legal experts and examined in a curious. the ball in a sense is in the american court the russian authorities have been extremely careful to do this by the book they've insisted on mr snowden making a problem. he's done it through a lawyer there is a well founded case here for asylum the u.s. has no legal grounds to object to know that he is in russia proper anything he the intention will be to apply for full refugee status if the u.s. nonetheless wants to jeopardize its very important relationship with russia because russia has done something which it is legally fully intitled to do that is a decision for the u.s. but many people will i think feel that if the u.s. does that then the u.s. frankly is behaving in a very strange and self destructive way. and while snowden vowed to keep his mout

do if he had delivered mr snowden out of the united states mr snowden will probably face life imprisonment in the united states so no civil list country can do it or this country will be respected . and while snowden valid to keep his mouth shut to enjoy russia's asylum his earlier revelations continue to shape the world the guardian newspaper has published a report suggesting that britain's government communications headquarters is not only spying on its citizens but has been funded by the us well let's check out how the tit for tat spying chain actually worked the u.k. g c h q pumped large amounts of money into efforts to gather personal data for mobile phones and applications saying it wanted to be able to exploit any phone anywhere any time in the past five years alone the amount of data gathered from the internet and mobile traffic by the intelligence agency has increased by more than seventy times. takes a closer look at the role washington is playing in all of this the us government has paid at least one hundred million pounds to the u.k. spy agency over the past three years now in return for this money they've got acce