ordinance unfortunately the ninth circuit passed a case that uses logic similar to the citizen's united logic in attributing corporate first amendment rights and free speech to companies. obviously i disagree with that opinion but it's a controlling nineth district opinion and i am asking for your support. >> i am happy to support this two years ago when it came before us and once again -- what is it? twice a year and you see piles and piles of yellow pages in front of every building in my district and i know throughout the city. i know the folks hold me it's like a dump truck and pores thousands of the books there and they should be able for people who want them, but just the dumping of yellow pages that happens throughout the city it's hostile to the environment. it's bad for our recycling system and i just -- i strongly disagree with the thinking that this type of pub occasion is deserving of what the court says protections and the court has done this to the speech and it is what it is. we are still bound by the laws interpreted by the courts so i am reluctantly supporting this. supervisor

so i think the logic here is to create a unit which would be operating on a low cost basis and then to pass those costs on to the consumer. what why are they doing it now i think is as you've said as there's been a gap in the market for two years they're seeking talking pilots planes but they're also facing very sharp competition now from foreign low cost carriers coming into russia we've seen easy jet for example stop flying from from london to moscow so i think also there are flawed or trying to some of the local scrapes in order to enable them to compete more effectively in the in the overseas market as was a domestic market and is it what about stamping out competition in terms of the russian market i don't think isabel stomping out competition i think you know the basis for a low cost airline is that you grow when you market to encourage people to go from coaches and from trains on to planes so i also i would say to be charitable it's about growing a market as a consumer if i'm going to buy a ticket and i see that air flow are offering a certain price then new but to add lime offe

killing the bees and that's why i bought one of the major research firms the logic if we allow the corrupt officials inside the united states government that no longer represent us if they don't stop and if they destroy the b population inside the us we're looking at some form of a collapse of the food supply and an economic collapse as well so other. they us stop killing your own country they have to come in and speak for us other nations are speaking more for the united states population than the united states government itself there was the future if these corporations keep control the biotech corporations are already on to the next phase which is something called biopharmaceutical crops where they actually have vaccines and pharmaceutical components already made inside the crops and now you're actually getting pharmaceutical drugs on your dinner table experimental vaccines on your dinner table but the f.d.a. also will likely not label these vaccine component crops and these pharmaceutical component crops to the point where you'll be feeding your family unknowingly all of these different vaccines and stems and eve

united nations. because we have there's absolutely no logic to how they're using the word war coming up a look at the chaos gripping libya stay with us here on r.t. . world. science technology innovation all the developments from around russia we've got the future covered. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realize that everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm sorry welcome to the big picture. language. could make it without the federal constitutional some of. the consent to. choose the opinions that immigrate to. choose the stories that impact the. true spirit. of truth. is so watching r.t. for more international news two years on from the fall of colonel gadhafi in libya the euphoria of the revolution has all but gone today armed militias and islamist rule much of the country fighting over territory smuggling routes and shares of dwindling on revenue to top that off desperate government is quietly reactivating colonel gadhafi zefi of surveillance a parrot is using it t

get the most generous rules now back to today the supreme court has not yet extended the logic behind citizens united to major league baseball although that day may come but they certainly have extended it to the financial services and banking industries that's where congressman republican congressman andy barr of kentucky and the house financial services committee come in he's white having little experience with the financial services industry or wall street when he was elected last year john boehner put those house freshmen on the powerful house financial services committee and as the new york times points out barr is a telling example of why the panel is sometimes called the cash committee a place critics say where there are big incentives for freshman to do special favors for the industry bars only six months into his first term as a congressman but he's already raised more money than pretty much anyone else in the house of representatives and more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars of it has come from the banks and what does all that money buy for the banks and for wall street they get an i

i would still say, john, when have we ever seen a president of the united states say that he's logical to relinquish some executive power. executive power has grown and grown and grown in this country over the decades, especially since 1947 when the national security state was basically created. and then even more so, in the age of television when the president became such a commanding president -- presence, schlesinger wrote a book "the imperial presidency" published in 1973 which traced all of the history. ever since then, die recall a president, democratic or republican, saying i'm willing to give up some degree of executive power until last friday. >> john: a government leader giving up government power. the tea party will like him now for sure. michael, why do you think his proposed changes at the foreign intelligence surveillance court hearings are such a big deal? >> i think this is probably the biggest of the four specific moves that he announced. granted, these are all just theoretical. they haven't happened yet. they're going to take awhile to happen. here is the deal with th

this result could be fueling the widening i'd logical gap in the united states. all right, kennedy.ely you have many male suitors. is it because they agree with the politics or is it because they are hot and men are stupid? >> i hope it is all of the above. what this research assumes is that the political preference is purely biological and that it is an inherited trade. trait. and the worry 1* if liberals get together with liberals and conservatives get together with conserve i have toes -- con coif tiffs they will have babies with a concentrated political preference. and anyone who has gone to college knows the first thing you do is a 180 from your parents. both of my parents are raging democrats and i have never shared their political beliefs. i am not saying based on my an neck dough tall effort -- evidence i can devalue the research. >> i don't understand what this study has to do with political beliefs. it is about dating. >> and people who date and later mate and have children they are going to -- >> how does that swooshing? >> this is not just about having children. they say

this war and he stuck with the united states is trying to stop at united nations we don't know because we have there's absolutely no logic to how they're using the word war. money is coming up after the break they do stay with us we'll have more on libya post gadhafi. wealthy british style it's time to the splits because. of the. market why not. find out what's really happening to the global economy is a report on our t.v. . we speak your language as i think about the war not a day of. news programs and documentaries in spanish what matters to you. it will turn it into angles stories. here. i'll teach spanish find out more visit actuality. welcome back is still with us here on r.t. two years on from the fall of colonel gadhafi in libya the euphoria of the revolution has all but gone today armed militias and islamists rule much of the country fighting over territory smuggling routes and shows of drinking all revenue to top that off a desperate government is quietly reactivating colonel gadhafi is feared surveillance a parrot is using it to hunt down dissenters. reports on the sobering anniversary. anniversaries are often

this war and is stuck with the united states is trying to stop the united nations we don't know because we have there's absolutely no logic to how they're using the word who or. what about the idea that the n.s.a. has already been allegedly spying on the e.u. along with these latest revelations of just what sort of effect does that help america's reputation here in brussels and is there anything any legislation that we could see europe setting up in order to shield itself from the n.s.a. . oh sure we could make a good data protection regulation and we are discussing nuclear data protection their connection in the european union however the national security debates around the data protection of nation are now incredibly tough and it seems that european political leaders are not as willing to. date steps to safeguard the trust and confidence in public networks and internet newsgroups that maybe we as citizens would like for them to indicate but so in general what we see in europe is a mishmash of outrage statements and political inaction but they took action not just ask you data protection isn't something that your party

the closest to the united states is now very frustrated that we have not responded in a clear way when they attacked 61 churches were destroyed. but the muslim brotherhood ied logicallythey dislike the united states but have accepted a sort of partnership and now they claim not helping them. we're talking 33 million demonstrators and majority in egypt, they are shocked that we basically are partnering with the muslim brotherhood, are not trying to find a political solution whereby egypt will move forward to democracy. there's a lot of work washington needs to do ahead. >> you reference the christians there, they make up about 8 million of egypt's population of 80 million. they've been victims of muslim attacks for years. and some christians were worried when islamists took over egypt's government back in 2012. and they were relieved when the military ousted them from power last month. but since the july 3rd coup that ousted morsi, christians have actually faced a spike in violent attacks. and the egyptian authorities have not prevented them, at least that's the perception. so what more needs to be done to protect them? >> well, first of all, as i said, the president

united states itself. democratic transition in which should deali with the authoritarian in the logical groups such as theuslim brotherhood, we are encountering still a force that is throughout the region growing in power which this president, to be fair, as you suggested, has basically implied has been on the run for the past year, yearnd-a-half. in fact, we find quite the opposite to be the case. wire we seeing so many confusing, confounding statements and policies emanating from this administration? we understand the complexity why a search our policies if we cannot, in fact, i implement th and pursue o interest as well as those countries ? >> each of the principles that i mentioned earlier are and the american national interest, but we wanted to make certain that the united states is basic interest in the flow of oil, security of israel, privileged position and the region is protected. that goes without saying. where we are today is really important. a rare moment of reflection. a new government backed by the military is taking control. i am absolutely of your view if understand you correctly, the uni

and that is to pursue the interest of the united states itself to the democratic transition in which you're dealing with the authoritarian in the logicals such as the muslim brotherhood, we are encountering still a force that is throughout the region growing in power which this president, to be fair as you suggested, has basically implied has been on the run for the past year, year-and-a-half. in fact, we find quite the opposite to be the case. why are we seeing so many confusing, confounding statements and policies emanating from this administration? we will understand the complexity. but why a search our policies if we cannot, in fact, employment and and pursued good for our interest as well as those countries that have been lost, whether it be -- especially in the case of egypt. >> each of the principles i mentioned earlier are in the american national interest. though we want in the middle east to make certain that the united states is basic, interest and the flow of oil, security of israel, privileged position in the region. that goes without saying. now where we are in egypt today is really important. we are in a moment of inflec

statements by the united states that we will not permit them to have a nuclear weapon if we're willing to tolerate this use of weapons of mass destruction? that appears to be part of the logic of why the united states is going to take some action here. richard haass, the bush administration state department official, said the administration has to enforce the norm against weapons of mass destruction actually being used. and part of the reason for that is to maintain credibility with iran. >> and in "the times" today -- we've got to go, john -- but it's apparently common knowledge or it's thought to be common knowledge in egypt that the u.s. has an alliance with the muslim brotherhood, and there's pictures of the president with one of those long -- calleda bed people on the street -- common knowledge. americans are with the muslim brotherhood and supporting terrorism. they killed osama bin laden, but they're with al qaeda in terms of egypt, which is just bizarre. >> reporter: it doesn't really make any sense when you think that the administration acquiesced in the removal of morsi, but on the other hand, the united states doesn't want the egyptian military to absolutely crus

use them kind of using that as a logic to preemptively use military strikes against countries you hit it right on the head absolutely there is a double standard united states criticizes syria for its alleged use of chemical weapons and may use that as a pretext to invade syria and it certainly is the weapons of mass destruction rationale was the pretext for bush to invade iraq even though they really knew there weren't any chemical weapons left weapons inspectors had been there recently and said there were none left and yet the the united states continues to use as you said depleted uranium white phosphorous which burns to the bomb cluster bombs which are little bomb let's that explode when children pick them up we continue to use these devastating weapons that that just proportionately affects civilians which are illegal under international law but of course this is not the only double standard you see a horrific killing going on by the military in egypt you see the obama administration making some weak kind of protest but you don't see them withdrawing the one point three billion dollars in aid that we give to to the egyptian government so there i

united nations. it's worth ♪ing when the attack first took place its government said it was i will logical and fabricated> we are sure of who did it, all we're asking for is to give time to the investigation team operating now in syria to conclude it's works to come up with the scientific report to be examined by the security council members. >> reporter: the comments coming from the u.n. from dr. brahami and his boss ban ki-moon. the vote in the house of commons, if passed, it means one of the u.s.' key allies won't be able to take part in any key action for some time. >> i'm joined now from washington by the former u.s. ambassador to n.a.t.o. welcome. >> thank you, good to be here. >> it appeared there was a move to slow down the united states today. was it successful? >> well, i'm not sure that the united states was in a hurry, so i'm not sure that it's a move to slow down the united states. there is obviously a lot of jockeying for position going on. i think there are several things worth clarifying. one of them is what the facts are. that we have a preponderance in belief that the syrian government

west specifically the united states he directly refuted claims that chemical weapons had been used by his regime against the syrian people saying that it would it basically defies logic he also spoke about saudi arabia's role as a key player in the situation in the conflict in question turkey's role saying that they are a puppet of the west this comes as turkey has said that they are willing to join a military coalition against syria to get strollo saddam out. regardless of if they have u.n. approval or not now as the u.s. and our late u.k. are looking at military options and both countries have put ships in the region the op of military intervention has always been on the table this is what bashar assad says he says in fact that the reason they haven't done anything sooner is because they just don't have support in the u.n. security council they've been blocked by russia and by china not just one country but two and they say there isn't support at home as well this is something that bashar assad is very well aware of listen to what he had to say another obstacle to a military intervention is that everybody understands the syrian conflict has nothing to do with the n

there were more hurricanes making landfall in the united states than in current years, and can you see that on that chart right there. now, i think logically people try to make sense of it, so you mention global warming, the oceans are warmer, hurricanes need warm ocean waters to fuel themselves with. >> i would think they would be worse. >> to get stronger, to form. >> there are counterveiling forces when water gets warmer that even the experts don't understand. >> don't fully understand and hurricanes are a lot more complicated than just warm ocean waters. >> now the property damage does keep going up, but that's just because more people build on the coast. >> possibly because more people build on the coast, and also reports of severe weather have been going up, let's say in terms of tornadoes, so that's another type of myth, but you have to also remember population goes up. people move. it's easier to report severe storms. >> more reports doesn't mean there are more storms. >> exactly. social media has made it much easier for people to be able to share information. people have cell phones now, cameras. people can take pictures of severe

logic, especially on the day of the arrival of the u.n. inspectors. i think they want to gain support from policy international players, first of all the united states. >> a correspondent in moscow has more on those comments by the russian president. >> reporter: this is the first time we've heard from president putin in many months discussing syria. the last time the topic was brought up was at the g-8 summit in northern ireland when he met with president obama. the talk then was very much of a peace conference in geneva. that's long gone and long past. i think now president putin realizes this is possibly the last chance, possibly the last chance he's got to deliver his verdict on a possible strike. the possibilities could begin at any time, so he took this opportunity to appeal to president obama saying, be careful. think twice before you commit forces to attacking syria. he said, i'm speaking to the president basically as a no bell peace prize laureate and asking obama how many civilians would be killed and innocent lives taken if the strike went ahead. as far as putin is concerned, as far as the kremlin is concerned, this attack, if it takes pla

goals might be the only possible, logical answer, if this military campaign is meant to morally undermine our people, i believe they are mistaken. the people of syria are unitedtogether with their armed forces and leadership and this is what enabled us to endure through our crisis. we are prepared to confront the whole world. the armed groups infiltrating through the borderlines from 83 different nationalities across our borderline with turkey from many countries including tibooty, these are documented facts. again, what are the goals or what the goals might be? i believe that any act or action taken in this region is meant to serve the interests of israel. therefore if any military campaign is launch against syria it is meant to serve israeli's purposes. secondly, it will, no doubt, serve the military purposes of al-qaeda affiliated front. therefore the united states, together with its allies are launching a military campaign against syria. first to serve israel's purposes which may -- they may take pride in and, secondly, to serve the interest of al-qaeda affiliated front. if they falsely believe that the military strike being planned will undermine our mil

logic. he sees these weapons as bargaining chips and has a whole lot of other issues. he wants to bargain with the united states on. conventional sources in europe. provision strike weapons. other issues he's sort of hanging on this nuclear complex and he refuses to take that next step. and he's got his own missile bureaucracy. the military industrial complex in russia that wants to keep building these systems. money's there to be made. they don't want the president to cut. >> as i understand it, russia actually has gone much further down on sort of having these strategic operational, fully operational deployed nuclear weapons out there. we're around i think it's 1,800 or 1,600 now. they're down at 1,400 or 1,500. >> right. >> they're expected to fall down much lower over the next decade. we don't actually need russia to begin to disarm our nuclear arsenal. >> here's the trap the president, himself, is in. he's trapped by his own cold war bureaucracy, the people who build and maintain these weapons and see them as bargaining chips just as putin does. so the u.s. has about 1,6600 strategic nuclear weapons

unit right now. >> you want to go ahead and pull over to the side of the road when there's an emergency vehicle behind you? >> the logicalto take it up at the hospital or take it up with us later. but he totally ignored my statement that we have a patient on board. >> you better get back in that ambulance before you get your butt to jail now. you understand me? >> after we take the patient to the hospital, you can take me to jail. we will discuss this, okay? >> paramedic white refuses to back down. his patient has fainted in her home and has a history of heart trouble. trooper martin tries to put the paramedic in handcuffs. >> hey, hey. >> on the dash cam video, the patient's family starts to gather. they have been following the ambulance to the hospital. the patient's husband reminds the trooper that his wife is waiting in the ambulance, but the argument continues. [ shouting ] >> you turn around now. >> the trooper releases the paramedic and the crowd breaks up. paramedic white returns to his ambulance, where his patient is extremely distraught. >> if you can imagine yourself, you're on a cot in an ambulance, you're ba

logic that is so clear, then surely doesn't it seem like something will happen? feels that way. and, yes, after hemming and hawing of almost epic proportions, the unitedes senate, controlled by democrats, did pass an immigration bill. the senate is controlled by democrats. 14 republican senators crossed over to get it passed. passing in the senate, though, does not mean it has passed into law. and having a vague misty sense that it must pass, that it ought to pass, that it might pass, that surely it's got to pass, right? that vague abstract positive feeling that it should pass is also not the same thing as something actually passing into law. it really does have to go through the house, too, and the house really is controlled by republicans. and whatever funky smelling cloud of smoke has settled over the beltway's reasoning on this subject about how surely it's got to pass, it doesn't seem like the republicans are going to let it pass. the chairman of the house judiciary committee is a key gatekeeper for this thing. if it can't get past him, it can't get past his committee. if it can't get past his committee, it can't get a vote. last night he did a t

units that are not under control of the jihad east. we know who they are. they are mainly in southern syria on the jordan border. saudi weapons are getting through to them. i don't understand the logict just because it would be dangerous to go all in with boots on the ground, or no-fly zones, we cannot do a lot of the little things to help get this war over. the longer the war goes, the better the bad guys that mr. dempsey is worried about, the stronger they get, especially in the north and northeast. i say let's not look at it as a black and white ink. let's look at the incremental steps we could take to hopefully win more people to our side when the thing is over and the rebels do win. >> jonathan paris, i want to thank you for joining us from london. we will continue to follow this as it develops. he four we go, let's say hello to james. -- before we go. >> we are looking at how this is playing out on social media. many reports are authenticated by the associated press. this is the danger of social media, where you can have a photograph and then immediately terminology including it. >> how many times have you been on and said this photograph was really not from today, it was from