it does not mean she is not beautiful or not nice. it means sometimes that some make me dream. summing we dream. >> inspiring you. >> yes. >> one thing that is very interesting in this exhibition if you have a section called urban jungle. you go and see it and it looks as though it is what you would typically say is taking animals and jungle and things i suppose from africa or perhaps india, but a lot of animals in it. as to get closer to the pieces, you realize that these are actually coutoure pieces. it is as though you have tamed the jungle. there is the extraordinary leopard dress that tells you where the coutoure are and how many hours of workmanship are in there. so when you pay the bill, perhaps it is justified. [laughter] there is one that was 1,032 hours of hand or again beating. they're very few designers i can think of in coutoure who would do something like that. we were used to seeing coutoure very much what i would call salon clothing, a very beautiful and very delicate, but not with the sentence animal, vegetable, natural being brought into coutoure. was doing co

you are not lying. you're not old anything back. what we have seen, and what i i want to make sure you promise us you are telling the truth. i am proud and perfectly willing to tell you everything i have said is the truth and based on the information as it has been presented to me. and based on my own experience in war, which i resolved to do if i was in a position to make any choices, fully vetted. i am comfortable with it. i would not make this recommendation if i were not. i believe we have vetted this. we have asked the intel people. we have even had a separate team created that had independence from the original team to totally vet, check all of the analysis. find out if it could have been the opposition. therery case i would say is a comfort level with this that is rare in this kind of situation. i would not have said you could prove this case if i did not believe it. >> apologize for the insulting question. >> i think it is an important question. we should ask more questions like that. i don't know how i would improve on my f

i would not, could not in the rain. not in the dark, not on a train, not in a car, not in a tree.n a house, not in a box. not with a mouse, not you do not like green eggs and ham? i do not like them, sam i am. could you, would you with a goat? i would not, could not with a goat. would you, could you on a boat? i would not, could not on a boat. i will not, will not with a goat. i will not eat them in the rain, on a train, not in the dark or in a tree. not in a car you let me be. i do not like them in a box, with a fox, i will not eat them in a house. i do not like them with a mouse. i do not like them here or there. i do not like them anywhere. i do not like green eggs and ham. i do not like them, sam i am. you do not like them, so you say. try them, try them and you may. try them and you may, i say. sam, if you will let me be, i will try them. you will see. and this page, he's simply holding green eggs and ham on a fork, preparing to bite them. say, i like green eggs and ham. i do. i like them, sam i am. and i would eat them in a boat. and i would eat them with a goat. i will eat

but they do not have to enact any new changes? enactthey do not have to new changes?> it is a complete swindle. it is a drop in the bucket for the nfl. makes $3 billion a year. the plaintiff attorneys got a lot of money out of this. didnfl is insulated, and it it by exploiting the fact that these people are hurting and wanted a quick settlement, and it was threatening six or seven years of litigation. >> it also threatens the "frontline" documentary at the past. >> absolutely. upn has pulled out. we -- espn has pulled out. we will now have to see if it impacts contract. >> the judge did not have to buy it at iop will not. i am with you, throw it out. >> the story is not complete. >> 2-wood be the first ever to stand up to the nfl. >> -- he would be the first person to stand up to the nfl. >> last word. see you next week. ♪ >>> from washington, the mclaughlin group, the american original, for over three decades, the sharpest minds, best sources, hardest talk. >> issue one, labor pains. much of president obama's focus has been on the middle class and quote/unquote, bett

that is not -- really not that.the main problem for us, for teachers, i think, is that we, that is perhaps really surprising. we do not have enough time to do what we need to do with the basics. for example, in the primary school we know -- we now have to teach foreign language very early. but french teachers do not know how to teach a foreign language in primary school. they are not trained to do that. so you took a world where they used to teach french. now they have to teach english. they do not know how to teach english. so you do not teach english, and you teach less french, for example. >> so time becomes too short. you need more time, basically, a longer school year? >> not exactly. but we need to do the main things first. i think that is the problem. we want our school to do a lot of things. we want our school to do computer training. we wanted to do foreign languages. we want it to do a lot of things -- morals and ethics. sometimes we just forget that we have to teach them how to read, how to write, and we

or not reviewed here is how you can reach out to us -- or not.ere is how you can reach out to us. @cspanwj on twitter. facebook.com/cspan. and you can send us e-mail, journal@c-span.org. newspapers highlight will happen over the next couple of days. from the front page of "the post " -- joining us to give us a sense of what could happen, the leadership editor of "roll call." thank you for joining us this morning. let's start with the house. s speakere boehner has regarding the short- term funding bill. guest: republicans are scheduled to meet at noon today. i think that is going to be a pretty important meeting. they have to decide as a behind ae, do they get specific alternative to send back to the senate? they have some choices here. they could just take up the senate bill, put it on the house floor, and it would probably pass with mostly democratic support. a lot of republicans would not vote for it because it doesn't the fund -- doesn't defund obamacare. or they could polut on a rifle shot, something smaller like a delay. there are things tha

we may not be able to win this, but that does not mean we should not fight, get some concessions that can slow the train down, i believe that can happen is that president slowed it down already, he understands this not ready for primetime, that employer mandate was not ready, almost 20 democratic senators up for reelection, are they not thinking? maybe it would be a good thing to be delayed one more year. >> do you think that is where this is going? they may not de fund it. >> if they were not out here planning flag saying this is where we want to go, we would be you know compromising on their turf that is the role it is not a popular role. >> i was looking ated to cruz, saying that was rick santorum a couple years okay, sort of the rodney dangerfield of the party. little did they know. the mainstream seems to say we need another mainstream guy to win it. >> look at australia. australia had two elections where socialist won. and what the liberal party -- conservative party -- they are reverse. neil: water turns opposite way so do politics. >> liberal party in australia went along with

she's not undercover. the agency would not let her speak.t the end of the day, the american public has been trillions of dollars on this since 9/11. the hunt for osama bin laden is a huge success story. why not talk about it? >> it was interesting. we began shortly after. i got the rights to peter's book. it was a wall before we started filming. at the time we are starting to film, all the controversy over the "zero dark 30" was breaking. the door started closing quite rapidly at the white house, at the cia in particular. the irony is we can talk what we want but the documentary is where we really wanted to just let people tell their story. that is where he faced a lot of roadblocks because of the cooperation with the movie. >> in both intelligent work and in intelligence related journalism, we are in a post- snowden era. what do you predict will be the effect of snowden's leaks when we ask for interviews and information? >> i do not think it will be a problem. in some cases it might be. people ultimately always want to tell their story. i h

match or is not right for our community. because they have raised about 2 feet up. and also, the back wall has been extended to about 4 feet. added a bathroom. so it is a very obvious changes, so it will make a disturbance or making, you know, very difference and look for the community. the reason they bought this, is because due to the health of the owner... but according to the plans that they have submitted, in order to get to the bedroom upstairs they have to climb stairs from the main building. from what i believe is just two parties support for this. actually it is support me, support my doing. the two of the people. however, in the document only mentioned one, the other one was not being mentioned. the project owner who gets the support if those people is not within the 100 feet of our community. even though according to the letter that was being drafted by the home owner's association. in that particular letter indicated that they are only making very small and minor changes. however, in the reality, the actual proje

they will not go to conference. they will not negotiate. and typical of them, they say we will not go to conference to negotiate to reconcile the difference between the house and senate bills, which are quite different. then they say the president will not negotiate. the president is always negotiating. bravo for him for declaring that the full faith of the united states is not negotiable. but everything else is a normal discussion that you have. i think you see what is happening here. they cannot even come forward - what they say in the morning does not exist in the evening. they cannot even negotiate with themselves much less anyone outside because there's not a talking point. really, let's clear the air with this. we have a responsibility to pay our bills. a large part of the deficit that is being subjected to the debt limit increase was amassed during the bush years. find me, please, one statement that any of these people made about the deficit and its rapid growth under the bush administration and the change from when president clinton

this is not iraq and this is not afghanistan. this is a limited proportional step that will send a clear message not only to the assad regime but also to other countries that may be interested in testing some of these international norms, that there are consequences. >> rose: the attorneys relation committee heard testimony today from secretary of state john kerry, chuck hagel and martin dempsey. >> we now have learned that the hair and blood samples from first responders in east damascus has tested positive for signatures of sarin. so my colleagues, we know what happened. for all the lawyers, for all the former prosecutors, for all those who have sat on a jury, i can tell you that we know these things beyond a reasonable doubt that is the standard by which we send people to jail for the rest of their lives. some have tried to suggest that the debate we're having today is about president obama's red line. i could not more forcefully state that is just plain and simply wrong. this debate is about the world's red line. it's about h

not [speaker not understood], not privatized. city college serves a diverse range of demographics. not only for those who transfer, but newcomers who don't yet know english. my mom is one great example. not only -- also those who are trying to get certificates to enhance their careers. i won't be able to complete my geographic information system certificate at city college closes because i have to take pre-requisites for classes at state ~. so, basically, my mom took esl classes three times in her life when she was in san francisco. she'll be starting her third round of esl classes in the fall. and she wants to master english in order to have a better life in america, and she won't be able to do that if city college closes. my brother is also starting city college in the fall and won't be able to if city college closes, won't be able to achieve what he wants to do, and he wants to study law. i've been humbled by my experiences at city college and it's nothing like what my high school teachers and media have told me. i regret [speaker not understood] many of my [speaker not understo

this is not a trivial matter >> no. not at all.y former activist is now the leading hawk of the obama team it is clear they make it up as they go along. you said you heard a lot that you saw hegel and the chairman be did not hear much when senator corker said white nobody is authorized from the president john kerry and chuck hegel waffle they said the opposition has broadened the authorization would support the resistance but in fact, the objective is do deter assad from using chemical weapons to send a message to other terrorists then they went on to say it is a limited time and scope and duration to include ivory and and all the others there will not be boots on the ground. >> can get we have heard the speaker of the house and eric cantor the majority leader both men could not wait to rush to make their statements in front of the cameras where is the opposition? >> there is no skipjacks and the closest you have is frank wolf could have been pleading for a special committee to investigate benghazi. guess what has been swept under

fascist choice [speaker not understood] was not accidental. it is said he decided to buy the states in this area because hitler liked these places and [speaker not understood] counted on having him frequently. many other leaders of third raich had a stake around meklinberg [speaker not understood]. chief executive department and in charge of concentration camps. [speaker not understood] quote-unquote objectives [speaker not understood], death camps on way from berlin. [speaker not understood] frequently visited these camps, watched thousands of people die, issued orders, then went on to their orgies at their estates. the state, so much effort to convince as it self-destructs. [speaker not understood] a military regime that is, unquote, quote, the state's effort to [speaker not understood]. received invaluable assistance from [speaker not understood], conform with the desires of meklinberg, other landowners, [speaker not understood] monopolies. >> next speaker. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. stop the corporate rape of our public library. don'

she's not undercover. the agency would not let her speak.the end of the day, the american public has been trillions of dollars on this since 9/11. the hunt for osama bin laden is a huge success story. why not talk about it? >> everybody in the film had left office. it was interesting. we began shortly after. i got the rights to peter's book. it was a while before we started filming. at the time we are starting to film, all the controversy over the "zero dark 30" was breaking. the door started closing quite rapidly at the white house, at the cia in particular. the irony is we can talk what we want but the documentary is where we really wanted to just let people tell their story. that is where he faced a lot of roadblocks because of the cooperation with the movie. >> in both intelligent work and in intelligence related journalism, we are in a post- snowden era. what do you predict will be the effect of snowden's leaks when we ask for interviews and information? >> i do not think it will be a problem. in some cases it might be. people ultimatel

darren [speaker not understood]. karen [speaker not understood]. [speaker not understood]. david [speaker not understood]. alan silverman. and bill gabriel. >>> honorable commissioners, i'd like to thank you for hearing our discretionary review. my name is darren rishwain. i live with my wife pamela and our two kill den at 1990 jefferson street. ~ first of all, i'd like to provide you with over 90 signed letters of opposition all from marina residents to this project at 3700 broderick street. i am sure you have also been given the numerous opposition letters mailed to the planning department by mr. cabrera. i would like to thank youv on some very important points discussed in some of the letters presented to the planning commission office. the first letter written by mr. [speaker not understood], a marina resident, lawyer, and owner of two lots on the same block as 3700 broderick street. in his letter he cites precedent setting cases in support of our discretionary review. the first point states that a variance must prove a hardship will ensure will ensue if the variance is

we did not receive notice. a company like ours , we receive 20-day notices and everything else all the time. and believe me, there is an iron-tight system to make sure that those don't go unread or unacted upon. and i believe that we had this same process -- same problem in '11 and, you know, at that time we worked with the then developer and accommodated going forward with the project at that time. and now there is significant increase -- there's a lot of material, impressions about exactions, are they paying the new exactions, the old exactions, combination thereof, the shadow impacts plaza, on the bechtel park, possibly others. it is a very significant increase and i just think that, you know, san francisco has been about one thing, it certainly has been about process. it has great processes and respectfully request that you consider a continuance on this project so that it can be studied out reasonably and that what is done and acted upon is acted upon in a prudent manner. thank you very much. by the way, t

[speaker not understood], she is not the first one. my ex-wife olivia [speaker not understood], she is not the last one. we should [speaker not understood] one of our supervisor, man or woman, to put the time to make a law or new law to protect these lovely children around us. ladies and gentlemen, i don't care if man or woman of you coming with law, to do something else, because i am going to see our and my friend the governor of california to do something else to protect these [inaudible]. thank you. god bless you. >> thank you. next speaker. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. stop the corporate rape of our public library. don't give money to the friends of the library. don't accept money from the friends of the library. the laws are there to designed to protect the public interest never work because there is no one to enforce them. certainly not the board of supervisors. i have pointed out that for a number of years the city librarian in san francisco has received from the friends of the library both a discretionary fund and an extern

if congress were not to authorize, the message that would be sent is not only do we not have a red lineut the congress would be sending a green light to anyone to use chemical weapons anywhere and know that they can do it without a response from the united states. obviously the array needs will also -- the arrhenius will try conclusion which is to say the americans have established a red line, they are not prepared to act on a red line when the administration makes it clear that prevention is an objective that will look more rhetorical than real. there is a direct relationship between what is going on in syria and how the arabians -- it.iranians will perceive there are those who say somehow that if we use military strikes against the syrians, because of the use of chemical weapons, this will strengthen the hardliners within iran. i wouldn't make too different. -- i would pay to differ. it has the opposite impact. it makes it clear when the united states says something about its objectives it aims what it says. and almost i would say the most diplomacyy to assure has a test is exceed wit

i do not think it will work if we do not have some credible threat to say, yes what, if this does notgo well, we have a whole other set of options and you will not like any of them. without them, this becomes a game of taking four months to decide when to meet. another six months to decide who gets to go into syria. that is not helpful to what is happening on the ground. >> do you agree there needs to be a credible threat? >> without a doubt. we are here because the threat of military force. opposition was starting to gain momentum, that is when russia wanted us to come to the table and to see what we could resolve. putin will only do what is good and second, russia. they know they are on the wrong side of the issue. it is about the only jurisdiction that works with russia. when hezbollah got into the game, things changed. we are winning. that was why we decided to coordinate. help them change the tide. we know where we are, the president made the right decision. asidely leverage we have, 100,000 of his own people. pullinger's people are all of his strings. we have to verify and we ne

not true? >> not true.cbo had a respect showed on budget -- report thathowed this is a deficit increase from day one. you would get more social security revenue those programs overtime p out more in benefiting than they take in, in taxes, this will increases deficit. charles: and you know taking care of people? you know, hospitalization, schooling education? this is a heavy load on the american taxpayer? >> it is. we looked at a report all different taxes that illegal imigrants pay, they do pay some, with sales taxes and the like, we look at government benefits and services they receive, it is a deficit in trillions over their lifetime. charles: it will increase everyone's wages? how does that happen? >> this is a fantasy, we know that immigration there will be winners and losers, for example formerly unlawful immigrants will see an increase in their wages, we saw this in 1986, when amnesty was passed then, but not going to help everyone, the cbo projects wage decreases among some classes of workers. charle

>> not just violence it is good. to remember coleco vision expensive going back 1984 it has come a long way. today video games like movies in better than that in the tradition of "star wars" full ivars sinn entertain is so not surprising that not all games are violent even as some city they are big business. >> just looking at the genre who is the leader? >> costing 60 million to produce during 3,940,000,000 in one day they will do 23 million i think it is a great franchise. another violent realistic game call of duty those are perfectly primed. >> it doesn't say anything about the because they can put down for what is a game. >> during the great depression many people found escapism that the great movie houses to escape their troubles now today even $100 with hours and hours worth of play? they may be terribly violent but people enjoy them and those that played them will not be violent. there is a lot of escapism that people enjoy and it is cheap entertainment. >> is entertaining and liquor that never go even during

the winter months, not so much. actually, very little impact at all which one might argue makes -- when they do have sunlight available to be that much more important. what's not represented clearly in these documents is the impact of the light on pam and darren's property. >> sir, your time is up. >>> thank you. >> thank you. >>> patricia vaughan, marina cal hal owe neighborses and merchants. i'm supporting the d-r requestors for several reasons. number one, this is basically an expansion into the side yard, what looks like to be an elegant glamorous set of steps. there is enough room in the existing building that you do not have to go out. this is the major portion of the expansion and the side. an elevator and a bathroom. architecturally with my background, this can be remodeled without the expansion. and my point with this is that you have to look at 28, 33, 35 baker as well as the 1490 case, and 23 35 baker was a very similar single-family home where they wanted to expand into the side yard and this commission

because the news of the world just is not this funny i'm not laughing dammit i'm not how. i got to the jokes i will handle that i'm. leaving. crosstalk are all things considered i'm peter lavelle to mind you were discussing a possible american strike against syria. ok go to you in washington again and when you look back over the last ten years of american foreign policy in the middle east why do you think it'll be different and better for syria with the military intervention what's different this time. i'm not saying it would be better or different what i am trying to explain is that the syrian people for the last two and a half years have been subjected to the worst humanitarian crisis the world has known we are subjected to daily shelling scud missile attacks barrel bomb attacks and what we are saying is that the international community has thus far been paralyzed in its inability to bring about any sort of negotiation we finally feel that perhaps a military strike is the answer and what we have seen when president obama began discussing the possibility of a military str

he is not an economist, not even close to being an economist.e just does not have that kind of background. it is very much like the time been a problem at treasury. this guy will easily have the bankers work around them and so forth. it will not work out well. gerri: all right. guess who is? larry summers. and he could be the next federal reserve chairman, and he is not just any economist. he won the base award which goes to this modest economist under 40. this guy has a resonate like none other. let me tell you, he is getting a ton of criticism from the left and the right. republican senators, democratic senators saying that there is no way this guy should have the fed. >> on the democratic side, he has the problem that the women did not like him. gerri: for good reason. >> well columbia as it may, it does not mean he is a lousy economist. he has a liability. gerri: let's explain that. when he was running harvard -- >> he made some comments that were in politics, especially from harvard president. women are concerned he is not sympathetic. gerr

not guess and the author is not his son put a whale -- well tailored artist? the last image of want to show you all so taken after 1864 similar to the potter photograph that the union general is the subject. in the middle of the photograph is burnside who has is lake crossed he is the guy that potter was under. what is interesting about this image is that the ghostly presence of brady himself in a hat although out of focus receives clear he was arranging the man for the composition in returning to the camera when his operator exposed at some of the people in the imager not quite ready is seems it is funny but it does speak to his role in the photograph when he was president and for me this image of brady there and not there he remains a goes the presence and important figure of his time of someone that we will never know or hold. thank you. [applause] >> if you have questions come to the microphone to. >> what does the b stand for? >> there's also question is how matthew is spelled. he was generally known as baby but there were many of his injuries were reprod

i do not -- that that does not distract me.host: if there was a vote for military strikes against, it has been said that we need to get rid of sequestration. if i vote yes on strikes, we have to do away with sequestration when it comes to the pentagon. do you agree with that? guest: i will be voting no if there is a vote. i assume there is not a major change to the array of factors. if syria strikes our country, that is a different thing. i think we need a progrowth replacement for the sequester, so any kind of activity in the congress, i agree with. host: mark is next, independent caller. guest: hi, mark. caller: do you have a redline about how many deaths you would tolerate? guest: i think any death is a tragedy. we should focus our efforts -- i was listing the set of sanctions we have in place right now. i think they can be much more stringent. we need to bring to bear the weight of the international community. we have these sanctions against the syrian central bank. we have not put effective sanctions across the financial i

it's not working.ed to cover everybody, and now 31 million people will be ignored by the law. it's not covering everybody. it's not working. they keep trying to delay things in the law. they keep trying to ignore the law. it's not working. >> when it's in place, there's demands that we cover everybody. you see that coming a mile off. >> yes. >> the rich are mean because they are not supplying enough money to cover everybody. >> and now we talked earlier, we're finding out that employees at major well-capitalized firms are not coveredded, but forced into this. >> yes. forced into private exchanges. >> that's right. >> like ibm and time warner. >> not working. >> another one for you for your comment because they are good this morning. this one's really going to get you. the list keeps getting longer for failed green companies. the energy department conceded that the federal government will lose another 42 million dollars on the clean energy loan to a failed michigan van maker. when will they learn this?

i do not think so. why don't we face up to the fundamental reality that the things need to be done in healthcare and we to make some of the things happen? >> the speaker said a whale of a fight is coming up. it is a clash on the government shut down. the speaker has said he wants an equal number of cuts in spending to the increase in the debt ceiling. he is under pressure to either defund or delay obamacare. the president says he will not negotiate on the debt ceiling. is that a position you would support, that he should not negotiate on the debt ceiling? >> first of all, we have the preliminaries and then we have the main advance. there is this positioning and dinner meetings and talking and getting there. there are a lot of people making a lot of tough statements about what they're going to do and not going to do. my feeling is that after the pushing and negotiating we will find some expense cuts. before we finish the show i want to talk to you about the gorilla in this room. staying on the subject, t

the mind says it will not going -- it will not work on this. the unions are up in arms about obamacare. why not let it take effect and owve the natural constituencies rather than doing it with this kind of extraordinary act, which is a block that you cannot really deliver on. >> senator ted cruz says he would do everything necessary, possible topel -- defund obamacare. that includes a filibuster and anything else. >> he also says he is probably not going to succeed. you are a parent and you get sick of your kids and you say, go play in heavy traffic. heave a feeling this is what is doing. he is saying to those people, go play in traffic for a week and then the grunts will come in and save your life. >> there is a messianic fervor to this. i do not understand witchcraft and what they are doing. >--ear in this case is that will the president hold firm to this? will he veto any bill that comes to him that keeps obamacare? will he hold firm on the debt ceiling? if so, he prevails. if he waffles or engages in any kind of negotiations with the crazie

renato [speaker not understood]. gordon mcclellan. patrick [speaker not understood]. [speaker not understood]. and kabin baras. okay. >>> hello, thank you very much for having this meeting. we really need it. my name is holman turner, i'm a professional photographer. i also teach at city college. i've done that for the past 17 years. so, ~ somehow i fell in love with students and they fell in love with me. and for months i've been walking around as if this was something surreal, that we could actually be thinking about shutting down city college. for months i kept asking myself if the accreditation firm that is seeking to close city college is so interested in the quality of their education, how could they possibly even consider putting 85,000 of them out on the street? the answer, of course, is contained in the question. only by putting them in the street could those who financially are supporting the accreditation firm get what they want, the business of education. their plan has been well thought out and executed. first you identify schools that already are accredi

are nots are bad and worth it. this law is not worth causing a shutdown over. eventhave another press we need to get to. one more question. you have been very patient. >> you said a couple of times and up or down vote. most of the time we interpret up or down vote bangs as a 50% s as a 50%vote threshold. democrats killed this proposal, are you all going to line up and talk this thing until september 30. it is a 50 vote threshold and harry reid can make you lose that. that setting by referring to an up or down vote bank, i am talking about the merits as --osed to a motion to table a non-debatable motion to table that goes straight to a vote not on the merits of it, but on the motion to table. >> thank you, everyone. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] >> on the next "washington journal," we will talk about the vote that will fund the government until december und the new health care law. we will talk about income and poverty with david johnson and ron haskins. is live onjournal" c-span

said, we're not going to do that, we're not going to do this, we're not going to do that. and that kind of -- i almost said that kind of leadership. the absence of leadership i think is what has led to this confusion in people's minds. will the outcome, if we do anything, be better or not? >> well, that's my question. as best we understand it, we're going to have a limited military strike, assuming that it's voted through congress, although the president seems to say that even if congress says no to him that he has the authority to do it anyway. >> which i believe he does. if you look at successor presidents -- >> that can be debated. that's -- a lot of people have a very different view of that, whether the president has authority. but in light of the fact that if our military service does limited strike, sends off 150 cruise missiles, 24 hours goes by, what do we have? >> well, that i think is the question. i think the president used the phrase before he went to play golf, something to the effect firing a shot across the bow or punishing. what have we achieved if that's w

they're not focused on you. they're not focused on you. i mean, i don't mind them disagreeing with me. they don't like the affordable care act, would rather have people without insurance. i'm happy to have that debate with them. but don't threaten to blow the whole thing up just because you don't get your way. one republican governor called shutting the government down over the affordable care act the dumbest idea he had ever heard. i agree with him. >> yes. it's a dumb idea. and a sick one. more tea party few madness that would take away health care from millions of people. so congratulations, house republicans. you just voted to take away coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. [ booing ] >> congratulations. you just voted to make seniors pay millions more for prescription drugs. [ booing ] >> and a special shoutout to you, speaker boehner. it takes genuine political cowardice to let the tea party run this country into the ground. >> thank you. >> republicans are playing a dangerous, demented game. threatening to shut down the

it's not exact live what -- not exclusively what happened. i think the -- hindsight 2020 but it's hard not to see that setting the red lines is not the best strategy and probably later on kind of trying to go to the congress under the situation where there's no technical or legal need to do it is something that you will have to consider once again and ultimately finding yourself in an unplanned situation of negotiation. it's not a perfect way to deal with it and the syrians especially or with the russians to a certain extent will find ways to dilute the kind of clarity that was there when kerry said okay, twler in seven days, give us within six months we'll destroy it all. and from a syrian point of view it's a great, great achievement. basically it's a victory for the next half year. i think that assad cannot remain in power the. the fact that you don't have a simple way to execute it now doesn't mean that you have to lose sight of what is the nature of what he had done or went through and what should be the consequences. he cannot -- there

listen to this. >> it is not iraq. it is not afghanistan. it is not even libya.re will be no american boots on the ground. we are not sliding through a backdoor into a war. we're not going to war we're taking a limited military action to enforce a very important principle. >> do you believe him? >> i believe him, but that's not the only issue. iraq looms over this because of a couple of important things we need to note here. the use of white phosphor russ, the use of depleted uranium in the gulf war. does the united states have the moral standing to draw a red line in the use of chemical weapons? i don't think we do without acknowledging that, it's hard to move forward. there are a range of issues for us to consider. if we want to make an intervention because we're looking at the 2 million regulars, look around the world. how do we make determinations who we're going to help and not going to help? why aren't we helping the sudan and giving more aid in other areas in the world where there's crisises? it's not just the issue of boots on the ground. it's about what

>> again, i do not know. there i do not really know.ow do i know better than people who live in these countries or go there more often than i do? it might. it might not. i cannot answer that question because i do not know the answer. >> what do you think? >> i think one can at least posit an answer in the sense. we in the united states forget our constitutional form of enforced by an independent court was unusual, was not followed in most of the from 1780 until 1948 in germany. people often look to the united states. what has happened around the world, increasingly in the post- second world war era, more and more countries turned to what i call the american system, a written charter of rights. why? not like the way parliament was working in germany, for one, and quite a few other places. when you begin to have models that are similar to the united states', you begin to look at the united states courts, but you also look at other courts. if you are in south africa or two english-speaking constitutional courts, they look at our opinions a

not very good. you may not know this, but the number one day for ecards on the planet is valentine's day. by a long shot. hallmark processes more on valentine's day. this is because you do not send a valentine on february 13, and he certainly did not send one on february 15. long gone. last interesting case for you to think about -- two years ago, super bowl sunday, doctors and dinners both men giant multimillion-dollar super bowl ad campaigns drive people to their web sites. what you do not know is one minute after the doctors at man -- multimillion-dollar advertising campaign, the website fell down. you did not want to be the i.t. guy there, right? furthermore, is widely believed that the problem that it was found on the denise site a week before. for those of you not technical in the room, i will tell you, the problem could have been solved technologically, meaning you could generated synthetically a ton of load coming from multiple sites around united states to simulate every case i just told yo

it was not, and they did not. it took four days of shelling before they finally allowed the men under prearranged structure. we have now where the hair and blood samples from first responders in east damascus have tested positive for sarin. i can tell you we know things beyond a reasonable doubt for the standard we send people to jail for lives. we're here because of what happened two weeks ago, but also we're here because of what happened nearly a century ago. in the darkest moments of world war i when the vast majority of the world came together to declare that no uncertain terms that chemical weapons crossed the lines and must be the end for use from ever. over the years that followed, over 180 countries, including iran, iraq and russia agreed and joined the chemical weapons convention. even countries with whom we agree on little, agreed on that conviction. some have tried to suggest the debate we're having today is about president obama is red line. i could not more forcefully state that is just plain and we h

of course, i do not.he producers did not do that. ♪ [ engine revs, tires squeal ] [ male announcer ] since we began, mercedes-benz has pioneered many breakthroughs. ♪ breakthroughs in design... breakthroughs in safety... in engineering... and technology. and now our latest creation breaks one more barrier. introducing the cla. starting at $29,900. ♪ [ male announcer ] now, taking care of things at home is just a tap away. ♪ introducing at&t digital life... ♪ ...personalized home security and automation... [ lock clicks ] ...that lets you loser to home. that's so cool. [ male announcer ] get $100 in instant savings when you order digital life smart security. limited availability in select markets. ♪ ...amelia... neil and buzz: for teaching us that you can't create the future... by clinging to the past. and with that: you're history. instead of looking behind... delta is looking beyond. 80 thousand of us investing billions... in everything from the best experiences below... to the finest comforts above. we'

we are not forcing the issue. we do not have any authority to force the issue. we encourage them and there has been a lot of media coverage on these five facilities. one has already changed their mind and i have a meeting on friday with another entity as well. >> are you concerned by your lack of authority to force these inspections and if there are these plants that are refusing these inspections, can you say with confidence what happened at west won't happen again? >> i can't say that with confidence. we have not seen their facilities. it is a policy issue with the legislature. that is a statute that would have to be facilitated, that is not in the present state law currently. we will see what the legislature is reviewing all of the issues with the investigation as well as the aftermath and to their credit they want to make sure these businesses are aware of the best practices and the various regulatory issues as well as federal are being reviewed simultaneous the. the president has executive -- issued an executive order to review how west occurred and if ther

but did not get a degree. she didn't have a degree like her husband did. >> how common was it for women to go to beer halls in those days. >> and turned around and stuff looic that. it was where young people went and young people in the '80s had the same -- the 1880s have the same impulses they have today. so's where people went. they didn't date quite the way they would in the 20th century. >> william taft was not intending a career in politics when he proposed to nellie taft. nellie harris. >> he wanted to be a lawyer and wanted to get to the supreme court. he would later say like any good politician he had his bowl turned upward when officers were falling into his lap. but he -- he definitely wanted to be chief justice of the united states from the time he learned about the law. >> and for those of you who don't know the history, william howard taft made good on the wish, he's the only president that serve in the role of chief justice of the united states. we'll learn more about the later part of his career

it is not a smart law. it was not supposed to take effect. they are holding economic progress hostage. that is the way things are these days. some people say they cannot walk into gum. >> one more piece of gum to throw in there. the farm bill came out of the house without food stamps. it is something your caucus was heavily propose to. do you see this moving through the house and the next month? ?s that going to get lost thehis is where you see how house of representatives is so .ummed up in it dysfunction you're talking about not funding the nutrition programs that so depend on.en i have a hard time believing that there are members of congress who are so gummed up they cannot walk into gum that we will allow a nutrition program that helps feed and let it children just languish because of politics. i cannot believe that. the dysfunction is big but i do not think is complete. i believe there are still some voices in the house that want to get things done. we will find out. we are supposed to get things done. we do not get elected to tell peopl

>> it's not true. it's a conventional foundation like almost all the circumstances buildings in san francisco. >> the trans-america was built way before. it's a pretty conventional foundation design. >> i have heard about this thing called the triangle of life and up you are supposed to go to the edge of your bed to save yourself. is there anything of value to that ? >> yes, if you are in your room. you should drop, cover and hold onto something. if you are in school, same thing, kitchen same thing. if you happen to be in your bed, and you rollover your bed, it's not a bad place to be. >> the reality is when we have a major earthquake the ground shaking so pronounced that you are not going to be able to get up and go anywhere. you are pretty much staying where you are when that earthquake hits. you are not going to be able to stand up and run with gravity. >> you want to get under the door frame but you are not moving to great distances. >> where can i buy a richter scale? >> mr. richter is selling it.

not comply, the u.n. will have to pass a second measure to approve any military or non-military action flick strikes or sanctions. where do things go from here? our correspondent has been covering the general assembly all week. we are now expecting it to be voted on shortly. what led to it am a what is the timeline, and what happens next? >> this resolution is seen as a diplomatic rate through because for weeks if not days, if not months, the u.s. and russia were in a deadlock in terms of how to proceed when it comes to syria because of the u.s. insistence that the use of force should be included in the security council resolution whereas russia was against the idea and with this latest breakthrough that happened on thursday, we now are expecting the security council to vote on this later this evening. it will not include the clause of use of force, something that is seen in the major -- as a major development. this is something that the u.s. was pushing strongly for. where we stand as after this resoluti

. >> that is not going to happen. gerri: debating whether not.h the latest and details, let's bring in a trader and editor for money news all smell of report an editor for the national review. boy, what a story today. and it continues. the house of representatives right now is debating to have a debate on the continuing resolution. we will bring you up-to-date on that as it happens. first to you, rich. i listened with interest to what the president was saying. it was a lecturer. one of the things he said is, one faction of one-party does not get to shut down the entire government. what do you make of that? >> i think the problem here with republicans is that they think they have the whip hand in this situation because they believe if we reach midnight and they're is a set down inevitably given the way the press covers the sort of thing, given the typical political dynamic, republicans will be blamed the and they will leech away lever's literally by the hour. so harry reid has no interest in negotiating, the president has no interest in negotiatin

they're not going to want to go back. these folks are not conservatives.tell you something. for someone to be libertarian and conservative and talk about staying out of bedrooms, we ought to get government out of our bedrooms. now you got them looking up some woman's crotch. >> uncle sam. >> of all. he's either a gynecologist or a pervert. >> but how can you disrespect the country like that? thank you for being here tonight, joe madison, joy reid. thank you for your time as always. and we should note we reached out to the koch brothers to join us. they directed us to the group they support which put out these uncle sam ads. >>> coming up, we'll introduce you to congressman phil gindry who's whining about his six-figure salary. that's next. >>> big news tonight. we have a new member of the complainer caucus. congratulations to georgia congressman phil gingrey. the national review reports he was in a closed door meeting whining about how capitol hill aides can go lobby and make $500,000 a year. then said quote, i'm stuck here making $172,000 a year. oh, booh