dpw's perspective is we don't want to eliminate some of the trees but also respecting pg & e. i think there is still plenty of room for access to the driveway. i think it's important to note that this is a really expansive vast sidewalk now. if you walk by it. i should have brought you a photo taken today. the sidewalk is already built out with no greenery. i think that is not in keeping with the city's plan policy. even though you might end up with an -- alone tree. i hope that you grant the authority for an allowing to assess rather than the planting of a quantity of the required trees that we would try to work closely with pg & e and the developer that would get the trees would be assessed, but if you would be willing to grant a little bit of flexibility that you were not able to compromise with pg & e, then perhaps to remove these would be assessed. i really believe there is room for one tree. the other thing is these were larger tree replacement requirement as you may recall the department we reversed our opposition for the removal of the trees because they were already d

we've been monitoring pg and e environmental efforts with respect to the hoedown yard and the power plant site including those lands off shore. and carol bock is our manager who has been monitoring that work. we think the cost to clean up that hoedown yard are pretty small to residential standards in the neighborhood of $600,000. we're buying the property on an as is basis so really what would happen is we would sale the property to a future developer. they would clean up the site if they were going to do residential use or leave it as it is and build a commercial use which is allowed under current closure. >> so we'll be responsible or the developer -- >> yes. >> where is the yard going to move to? >> we discussed this and the commission expressed a concern that it not move to port property. pg and e heard that. so we can't tell you where it's going to move to. that will be part of pg and e due diligence over this next period of time as finding an alternative location for that use, but i think we can report to you that it won't be on port property. >> thank you. my last question is the 7