mr. gibner, under the law that was passed earlier this year, there is not a ground under the appeal to adjust the fee unless we find there is not a relationship and nexus of the impact of the development. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. that is correct. there is only one ground for reducing or our adjusting the waiver fee that there is no relation between the nexus impact. >> and as well as the appellant ability due economic or disability. >> that is correct. >> that we might carefully constructed upon which is on this base. >> that's right. the fee is based on a determination of the nexus and the nexus study provides the largest fee that the board could have imposed for conversions. but it was in the board's legislative discretion to impose lesser fees or create exceptions legislatively for people who meet certain income requirements. >> thank you, one follow up question, i was informed by my staff that there was one or two ellis act evictions at this site. could you let us know if that's the case. i can ask any of the city staffers. >> we don't have the research on it. that issue is go

mr. gibner. colleagues, i propose we conduct the hearing ways typically do. first the appellant will have 10 minutes to present her case for the appeal for the condominium conversion fee and next the public can speak for 2 minutes and following that relevant city departments including on housing and others will have 10 minutes for presenting their analysis on the condominium fee and those supporting the application of the fee may have up to 2 minutes and the appellants may have 3 minutes for rebuttal. any objections to this proceeding? if not, why don't we hear from the appellant. okay. >> good afternoon, everybody. my name is christina. i am the person leasing on 849 sanchez street. what i'm trying to, based on the nexus, i of course have no chance on having you understand what my situation specifically to me because i have a disability not only of -- but i need you to understand what my situation has been to first find a house and second keep it. first of all i'm having a hard time understanding why the city would have somebody like me pay an impact fee of