that was pushed beback by the commission as insensitive to joining the seniors homes that was sensitively masked to have one comply with at van ness avenue plan and plan intent. it stepped back from pine street and left light and air for the lower floor dining room areas and the recreational programs. the swimming pool faces pine street and the eir doesn't properly address that nor discuss the change in qualities of light within the residential units that will be seriously effected given that the project proposed in the eir has simplistic oversized residential blocks to say this project meets the objectives. i suggest the developers objectives shape what the san francisco need and the eir needs to do. so when the battle when it comes to continual approval to say it has been properly address. i think it should be more of a strong tower configuration and deals with the larger objectives that are recognized by buildings already there. the internal revenue as it stands fails to meet the larger objectives. we're not designing islands we're designing context of already taller buildings to the s