christopher phillips: it has been a while. it's great to be back.rry: listen, you know, when i had you here, it was all about "socrates cafe" first and then "socrates in love." which was a form of "socrates cafe," just studying love. so you took that form and now did something interesting. you traveled around the country this time with what you're calling "constitution cafe," and you're doing the very similar thing. you're having these socratic discussions with--as i introduced you--with groups from prisoners to the playground, and you're looking at how in our modern times, we view the constitution and what changes would we make if we could and if we should. so that's sort of the setup. am i right? that's what this process is. chris: it is. i mean, the could and the should, it means that there's a moral component to this. so it's very much socratic inquiry. and for the first time, i'm actually using a specific text, and a sacred text at that, to examine socratically where we are as a nation and whether this document, the constitution, which is just