out,nator menendez pointed you push back on that. the u.n. has come out against the u.s. position that if a monitoring body finds reservations are no good, we assume the country is still bound without the benefits of those. we may push back on those as well, but it argues for clarifying this in the ruds. >> the fact the supreme court recently heard a case whether treaties made expand congress raised concerns about federalism. case highlights some of the concerns that get raised when you have a treaty and then implementing legislation. senator menendez is correct that we don't get had that because we have earlier legislation. the issue people are afraid about is what if we have new legislation? in the bond case, a lot of people were surprised that the treaty power that was supposed to deal with syria is now being crimes within a state. the justices on the supreme court were surprised. i would not be shocked if the senate were surprised if that was what they agreed to. you may find down the line that congress or the executive branch applies them in ways that the senate neve