i'm glad that san francisco redevelopment agency is dead. i'm very glad. and i see before me some -- what would i call shadow ghost of the san francisco redevelopment agency trying to comprehend something. you heard a long winded explanation which is people were harmed, people were thrown to the streets, people were harboring their sorrows, middle class families who were grown to poverty and respondent and took up habits like drinking and many of them died, but when they came here from east coast, middle class families came with with an education, they brought a lot but redevelopment saw to it that they destroyed the family. so in shock today you guys to some legally are calling upon the state of california to create affordable housing so we have tons and tons of market rate housing but we don't have affordable housing and then we have affordable housing, we choose to build them on contaminated sites like the shipyards which are grown to flooding. you can't understand that because you don't read the engineering reports but i can because i've read it and i

the bond authority has been by the same redevelopment agency and the redevelopment financing authority and with the automatic succession of these bonds, the ocii commission would be able to reconstitute the refinancing of this authority. the reason why the financing authority is a party to this contract because under the terms of various state guidelines it cannot do a negotiated sale but a financing authority can. if you want more explanation for the reason behind that, i can leave that to the attorneys. it has been the recommendation of the financial visors on this deal that a negotiated sale is necessary in order to get the best terms for these bonds because of a special status of the success or agencies and the fact that this is the first in fact new money bond deal under the terms of redevelopment dissolution. it requires a lot of education of potential investors as to why they should be competent with interest rates as coming into this as a new entity. we have been advised that a negotiated sale is the way to go and we need to do it through the financing authority structure. this

i would like to say that i have came, i never missed a meeting of redevelopment. i went before redevelopment to talk about my church that was built in 1958 and when the role was built in oak dale, they built it flat. water, when it rained went through the building. redevelopment was supposed to put that church on the hill on the parking lot. that never occurred. we were here before the mission bay and anything else. i would like for you all please, please, don't forget that redevelopment started in 1968 in bayview hunters point. and the work that was supposed to have been carried out has not, has not. i don't feel as though i need to continue to come before this board any other board to plead for you all to do the right thing for bayview hunters point. thank you so very much and you have a blessed day and don't forget, pray for me and i will pray for you. i have been under the weather and bless all of you. >> thank you. any other comments today? thank you miss jackson for coming today. sorry you are under the weather. okay. questions on mission bay bonds? start. m

starting in the late 1990s the former redevelopment agency was aware as most redevelopment agencies were aware that many of the older redevelopment plans were going to expire. because of the way these older plants have been established and the statute governing them, a lot of them were going to expire around 2009. more significantly the ability to issue debt was going to expire around 2004. this prompted many redevelopment agencies to look at state fixes to try to extend the life of redevelopment. in san francisco the focus was on trying to extend these older redevelopment plans to provide funding for affordable housing. there was a lot of controversy about this in san francisco and throughout the state because a lot of the people didn't want to give any extension the authority to development agencies. we in san francisco had tried to limit the scope of the extension to provide funding for affordable housing. we worked with senator john's office to further limit and design what the nature of the obligation was for san francisco. the result was special legislation that only affected san f

and this is part of the transpay redevelopment plans and the open skate. and project. to realign to make it with the existing ramp on freemont street and without a traffic signal and provide for the president crossing across the base of the ramp and then allowing for the redevelopment of the parcel. and to do this, we also with the freemont street and so that all turn and movements will be preserved and all assets will be preserved instead of the right that you come off of the ramp now you will come down to the ramp and make a 90 degree and go up to the single. >> the car pool don't they drop off in this area? >> they will be able to do that and that will remain open during the construction. and the off-ramp and the off-ramp will remain throughout construction. >> and so nothing will be disturbed. >> no. >> thank you. >> i actually got the 100 percent yesterday and so we are at 100 percent design and so the transportation authority is going to administer this contract and they had other approached us to do the design work and asked us for the implementation for constru

>> we are not sure how that happened because we've done so much work with redevelopment agency with over 25 years. we understand all the processes to go through. we go out on the website, we go out on several publications and we send out several letters and we've worked with people in the past and our e-mail that we used to e-mail blast people. for some reason there were people that said they didn't get notice. we had a copy of the letter that we sent to him. he turned in a bid four months after. we were able to reverse a contract that had gone out and awarded to him because he was local. so we are trying. and then once we found that situation, we made sure that all the data we had was correct for the next phase. we made sure he was in the data base to get the notification the next time around. we've been improved but something address are in correct and they haven't gone through the certification and we are just going through the most recent list that we have. >> okay. >> george bridges, i would like to add that often the companies will have an e-mail and it might be an admin person and

i have also worked with the former redevelopment agencies on the yerba buena gardens and the children's center. i would like to introduce some of my colleagues that have been involved on blocks 50-51. i would ask them to stand as i call their name and stay standing. cheryl smith is the director of community affairs, she is ably assisted by her project manager terry mitchell and patrick banks is our site development manager for blocks 50 and 51 which is a subject of our discussion today. thank you. robert sub she has been selected as the correct county -- contractor for blocks 51, 50, and 54. the blocks are being awarded to 84 percent. there is still some contracting to be done. 53, 54 has just been bid and has 0 awarded yet. in spite of complying with our good efforts, we have not yet met those goals as outlined. we take the responsibility very seriously and evidences with our commitment on our professional hiring that we had a 78 percent grade bond. we are committed to improving the vertical construction participation goad forward, but we must learn from block 50 and 51 because what we

percent of item a: authorizing the issuance of tax allocation bonds for the mission bay south redevelopment project area in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70,000,000, and approving and directing the execution of an indenture of trust, and a bond purchase contract, and approval of other related documents and actions, mission bay south redevelopment project area. discussion and actionn resolution no. 52-20133 page 3 of 3 bb update on the status of hunters point shipyard local contracting and construction workforce hiring; hunters point shipyard project area. discussionn cc final workshop on the long-range property management plan pursuant to section 34191.5 of assembly bill 1484 'redevelopment dissolution law'". discussionn dd workshop on the streetscape master plan, signage plan and major phase 1 application for candlestick point; candlestick point and phase 2 of the hunters point shipyard project area. 1234 #2450u8 almost 14 percent are minority owned businesses. now switching to the work force hiring slots for construction, part of the project is 15 percent complete. the subc

property that would identify a specific use for a redevelopment plan, then in that case it has to be transferred to the city. i have been keeping those, we have kept those in mind as we have discussed these properties internally and physical figuring out what the best plan is for all of these and we'll be producing these to you today. first the transbay parcels and what we are talking about here is one that we own now, we only own one, it's block 11b which is purple. and then we have options to purchase in the if the two other park parcels and block 10 in the corner. so like i said i'm not going through the enforceable obligation discussion because there is a lot of information in your memo and if you have questions i will answer. i'm going skip right to the disposition plan for those. for 11b and 3, so for parks, 11 b and 3. we have the same disposition. we would basically just retain those temporarily to fulfill our development obligation. we would ensure that they are developed as parks and then once they are developed as parked we transfer them to the city and the city would main

the bond purchase contract is a three way contract between the redevelopment financing authority, the success or agency and the underwriteers for the purchasing of these bonds. e

>> red's java house will be on a pier that will be redeveloped to incorporate the james herman new cruise terminal. and, yeah, the whole mixed-use development at bryant and embarcadaro. red's java house will be preserved. and actually it's going to be shifted over a little bit so it doesn't get completely innovated by the new design. >> does anybody here eat at red's java house? look at all these people who eat there. a double dog and a bud for how much, 3.49? this is a san francisco institution. >> this is a relic. red java house, they serve long shore man and other people who work at the waterfront. there used to be a lot of other ones. these have survived. >> the boondocks now called high dive. the building survived, thank goodness. and then interestingly, along underneath the high dive, i guess it's part of the sculpture and public art. the band, light band and all that. >> the art ribbon. >> the art ribbon, thank you. and you see the little skateboard stops. this was an immediate draw worldwide, people came to skateboard the embarcadaro. and they're still here, right? they're still h

that's the required ordered in the redevelopment plan that add ten years of community process so this was per the bay view communities desire that this should be the order. then because of the infusion of choice neighborhoods and the connection to /alg alice griffith, that's first and then the rest of the order. >> while we're on the subject, if we can i guess, begin to have the conversation around just this whole lottery system. i know that we have discussed this many in the past and we had an update, but it seems as we begin the transfer of these assets, we have a system that's inefficient and i don't know how to address, but i think there should be some type of consideration made, again, as we begin to transfer these assets, it's our duty to make sure that the right folks get into these units and it would make no sense to transfer as assets with a broken system. >> thank you. actually to that end, we have kathy davis who's the executive director of bay view hunters point and she is probably the single most successful person outreaching to our certificate of preference holders. she

is a statutory obligation, we need a /soeurs of funds so that's the funding stream so in those redevelopment plan areas where the program is complete, golden gateway, south beach, now there's ability after death service to be able to use the additional head room in that tax increment for this tax purpose so we've built approximately close to 1,000 today, but about 6,000 still exist, so it's the obligation and funding stream. if the city were to accept the obligation, it would have to identify a funding stream so it would be unwise for the city to accept the obligation without a source of funds to do it. >> okay. i think i have some more thoughts on that, but that's not part of this resolution so we'll move on to other questions. can you just also explain again sort of the separation of the income stream from mixed use property that is are being transferred? what does that mean? >> so disillusion laws provides for an ability for the oversight board to make a determination that if you had a mixed use as sets bra oversight board believed it was not a benefit to the community and it was a benefi

most recently i have been before the redevelopment commission as a member of the commission administration and a couple of years left the city to start a bay area office for m-cal and i'm really excited to be involved in the first affordable development at the shipyard which has been a long time coming and we're really ex -- excited about the work and the way you've paved. we've got a great design team and we're excited about the proposal in front of you and the work we've done to date and we feel like with your nod of approval we'll be headed to breaking ground in the early part of next year. we're realry excited. i want to thank you forgiving m-cal the opportunity to date to work on its first san francisco project. we've been around for 30 years and done 40 affordable communities in the state of california. we still own and operate all of those so we're a long term player and investor in the community and we're looking forward to adding san francisco to that list of communities. i want to turn it over to our local community partner, young community developers, weldon and we'll introduce

felt that was a stronger argument when we went back and looked again at the phase 2dda and the redevelopment plan which specifically kind of envisions that there are going to be these community facilities that have a public purpose. therefore they should -- we feel that's a strong argument to keep them in the city's -- transfer them to the city and artist studios and keeping the rents at cost. which the dda says rents can only be charged to cover expenses. and having the city take on that function is perhaps easier than enforcing that through a third-party. this is what we're arguing and it may not be something that the state accepts, but based on our understanding of what the community and the developer would like, this is our strongest argument for trying to get that, but the state could reject it and make us do something else. >> i'm going to have to ask you ask staff for you question because i can't address members of the public. i'm sorry, yeah, i understand what you're saying, but that is how we do the procedure for these commission meetings. there's other types of forums for the types

rogers fighting against the injustice of redevelopment and how we make decisions in this city. this is why i'm personally so appreciative of the tab natural doing the outreach. the reefrdz were aggressively outreaching to the african-american community because our numbers are over he 50 percent of the population which includes the seniors. ms. rogers wanted to make sure we were reaching out to the population and make sure they were living here like not only in the city. i appreciate the tab natural. we had a previous developer michael johnson's has stepped up to the plate. michael johnson stepped down with the china town and they said absolutely we want to be part of this they develop incredible housing projects so the partnership of those along with the tab natural to make this affordable housing possible t is absolutely incredible and i know ms. rogers is 13450i8 down on us to make sure wire doing the right things. i'm honored to be a supervisor at that time, like this is opening up to our population. it's a beautiful building. i haven't seen the artwork but mario was activel

>> well, i did serve on the san francisco redevelopment agency commission and the fire commission andas really fortunate to run this great center. and all of those experiences, running a nonprofit, being on a commission, working for the city, responding to constituents, doing the kind of things many folks are doing every single day to make our city better -- i mean, i don't see a better preparation than that for becoming a city supervisor. the nonprofit world is a very challenging community to work in because of the fund-raising involved, because of the need for such great programs. so, to be in the middle of that and to advocate for an incredible community asset, to work with city departments, to attain funding, i mean the list goes on and on. so, over the years i've been fortunate to develop some incredible relationships with city department heads and other city commissioners who helped me to do some of the great work i've been able to do in the community. so, it's somewhat of a natural progression and i think all of that entails really helped me to be -- it's going to help me in my

. >> you mentioned working on the redevelopment commission for five years. now that the state has eliminated redevelopment agencies, do you think that the board of supervisors and the mayor is really doing enough to serve the city's housing needs? >> well, i think you can never do enough. i mean, there's still a lot of folks that are homeless. but i do think that san francisco is leading the way to innovative policies that can really help change things for the better post redevelopment. i think that the affordable housing trust fund is a step in the right direction and is something that no one else is doing all over the state. i think that the fact that san francisco is so committed to affordable housing, we already had resources where we were invested in affordable housing in the city. but more importantly, we're looking at revamping public housing and how that is a bigger picture of affordable housing long term for san francisco. we're looking at public-private partnerships. i just think san francisco is really leading the way. and could we do enough? you

the basic what it is remodeling and redeveloping the sharp park safety infrastructure improvement and inhabitant impeachment project. it's on item a-1. the opposition i have with this is simply the fact it the eola damage as well as the fiscal ramification of this plan the project to expand the pump house as well as the redevelopment and improve the infrastructure of the park is a serious issue with the funding of the capitalization of the park and golf course the city is continuing to pump money into a failing golf course on life support. and the recent survey found the hiking and biotic trails are the number one recreational priorities of san franciscans. shatter park as failed to turn a profit for the city. and as a result has cost the san franciscan taxpayer $8 million. that's 3 hundred thousand to around $700,000 a year. that's money that would have been spent on a wide range of things other golf courses and social services. things of that nature after an unjustly service that continual bleeds money given the fact that people don't use it. the eola factor it is built from wetland

i also had the privilege of working with the redevelopment agency in building affordable housing across the street from somac, the west brook plaza which is affordable housing location run by mercy housing that provides a dignity for folks and i believe this is one of the issues i'm extremely passionate about. i believe that san franciscans do need affordable options in housing, especially the population that this committee would serve, and then the economic development piece, i was fortunate working in mission hiring haul to experience the redevelopment build-out of the 6th street and the build-out of the small businesses and i think that the economic development piece is essential for providing people with the opportunities and living out their dreams. it's an honor to be considered for this position. i feel as a person that san francisco's given much, i deserve to give something back and i open myself up for any questions? >> any questions from my colleagues? seeing none, thank you very much. any public comments at this point? come on up, two minutes. >> hello, supervisors, my name i

just when you thought it was over it is redeveloping. they are tracking some showers and our radar on mount saint

board of supervisor's resolution 11-12 to elect to retain the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency and to accept the housing assets, accept a transfer of all of the housing assets pursuant to disillusion law that was comprised of assembly bill ab 26. in march of 2012 the oversight board took action to acknowledge all of the housing assets had transferred to the city as housing successor. however, the end of june of 2012, the state amended disillusion law through assembly bill 1384. it did a lot of things, but one of the things it did was it changed how the assets should be treated, especially in transfers to housing successors and provided that transfers of housing assets exclude any balances that are retained in the low and moderate income housing fund and ex/khraoded the transfer of any obligations that were retained by the successor agency. it also required that housing successors provide a list to the state called the housing asset transfer list or the hat. that due date was august 1, so pretty much just one month later the city was required to turn in the hat and the ci

planning and redevelopment agencies are clearly involved.reet. we have john's restaurant down stairs. say you want todd remodel it you have to go to planning and say, are we permit todd have a take out restaurant in this location or a fast food restaurant in this location? the planning department and redevelopment and port and others have very, very specific regulations it's almost block by block. have you to bring into the planning department your address so they can look it up on the zoning map to see what you are permitted to have. before you get further involvement in a restaurant the first thing you have to do is see if it's allowed in this location. in many cases you will need to get a conditional use or other authorization which takes months and expensive and can be a deal killer right there. all these other agencies are involved the fire department are involved they are involved in assembly occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more. the building department looks at construction reasonable doubted things the fire department look